Hungary - NB IETO ParkData current as of 16 October 2026

ETO vs Ferencváros: match statistics

ETO crest
ETO
0 : 3half-time 0:1
Ferencváros crest
Ferencváros

ETO vs Ferencváros: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

ETO played Ferencváros in NB I (Hungary). The match was played on 3 September 2026. Venue: ETO Park. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

ETO: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Ferencváros: 2-1-1, 1.75 points/match.

Goal statistics

ETO scores 2.20 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Ferencváros scores 1.25 and concedes 1.25. League average: 3.15 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: ETO 60%, Ferencváros 50%. Over 2.5: ETO 60%, Ferencváros 50%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Ferencváros has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.14. ETO: 8.8 shots per match, Ferencváros: 9.8.

Match halves

ETO: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 1.40. Ferencváros: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

ETO: 76-90+ (5 goals). Ferencváros: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NB I: 3.15 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

ETO sit in 1st place, while Ferencváros are only 10th, and the hosts remain unbeaten in their last five matches, recording 2 wins and 3 draws. At home, ETO won their only match so far 4:0, keeping a clean sheet, whereas Ferencváros lost their only away match 2:4. The hosts are particularly clinical at home: 5 of their 10 shots per match are on target, and their finishing efficiency stands at 40%, compared with 22% for the visitors. Ferencváros enjoy higher away possession, 60% compared with ETO’s 35%, and have a slightly better attacking xG of 1.47 versus 1.33, but they allow opponents an xG of 2.06 and concede as many as 4 goals per match away from home on average. Both teams have scored in every match under these conditions, so an away goal is possible, but the stronger defensive record and home advantage favor ETO.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Recent form clearly supports goals from both teams: ETO recorded BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches, while Ferencváros did so in 60%. During this period, the hosts averaged 3.0 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, whereas the visitors scored 1.8 and also allowed 1.4 goals per match. The attacking potential is supported by ETO’s xG of 1.58 and Ferencváros’s 1.24, alongside the high xG allowed by both defences: 1.78 and 1.64. The data from the very small seasonal sample is extreme, but ETO’s 100% clean-sheet record and failure to score do not align with their last five performances, so greater weight should be given to the current run. BTTS - Yes is therefore more likely than the scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as ETO averaged 3.0 goals scored in their last five matches, while Ferencváros averaged 1.8, with both teams conceding an average of 1.4 goals. Both sides went over the 2.5-goal line in 80% of their last five fixtures, clearly supporting a scenario with at least two goals. Their creative potential is also solid: ETO’s average xG is 1.58 and Ferencváros’ is 1.24, while their opponents generated 1.78 and 1.64 xG respectively. The Hungarian league produces an average of 3.45 goals per match, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games, so the projected total of 3.20 goals provides a very substantial safety margin for Over 1.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

ETO are unbeaten in their last five matches, averaging 1.8 points and scoring 3.0 goals per game, while Ferencváros have conceded an average of 1.4 goals during this period. The hosts held the lead at the break in 60% of these matches, compared with 40% for the visitors, while both teams have averaged 1.2 goals scored before half-time. The strongest argument for ETO maintaining their advantage emerges after the interval: the hosts score an average of 1.8 goals in the second half, while Ferencváros manage just 0.6. ETO have won the second half in 60% of their last five matches, whereas the visitors have lost it in 40%, making the HT/FT scenario of the hosts leading at half-time and securing the final victory the most likely outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
ETOFerencváros
7Shots12
ETOFerencváros
3Shots on target7
ETOFerencváros
0.92xG1.73
ETOFerencváros
4Corners9
ETOFerencváros
36Dangerous attacks67
ETOFerencváros
11Fouls22
ETOFerencváros
2Cards1
ETOFerencváros

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.2Goals scored / match1.25
ETOFerencváros
0.8Goals conceded / match1.25
ETOFerencváros
52%Average possession58%
ETOFerencváros
3.8Shots on target / match4.25
ETOFerencváros

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.8Shots per match9.75
ETOFerencváros
3.8Shots on target4.25
ETOFerencváros
25%Shot conversion12.8%
ETOFerencváros
52%Possession58%
ETOFerencváros
1.14xG for1.4
ETOFerencváros
1.68xG against1.2
ETOFerencváros

Shooting quality

ETO: Efficient finishingFerencváros: Balanced
ETOFerencváros
Accuracy (shots on target)43%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.580.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

ETO
DWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
40% W60% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Ferencváros
LDWW
Season result split
50% W25% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 away
2-0-1
LWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

ETO is 76% better for: goals scored per match.

2.2 goals / match - ETO · 1.25 goals / match - Ferencváros

ETO is 56% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.8 goals / match - ETO · 1.25 goals / match - Ferencváros

ETO scoring profile: very strong

ETO scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Ferencváros keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).

Ferencváros scoring profile: strong

Ferencváros scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while ETO keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

11Goals scored (season)5
ETOFerencváros
4Goals conceded (season)5
ETOFerencváros
3Average goals in match2.5
ETOFerencváros
11Goals scored (last 5)5
ETOFerencváros
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
ETOFerencváros

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal75%
ETOFerencváros
60%2 goals50%
ETOFerencváros
40%3 goals0%
ETOFerencváros
20%4 goals0%
ETOFerencváros

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal50%
ETOFerencváros
20%2 goals25%
ETOFerencváros
0%3 goals25%
ETOFerencváros
0%4 goals25%
ETOFerencváros

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time25%
ETOFerencváros
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ETOFerencváros
40%Scored in both halves0%
ETOFerencváros

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
ETOFerencváros
40%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ETOFerencváros
60%BTTS - last 550%
ETOFerencváros

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
ETOFerencváros
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
ETOFerencváros
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
ETOFerencváros

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
ETOFerencváros
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
ETOFerencváros
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
ETOFerencváros

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

ETO is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.2 pts / match - ETO · 1.5 pts / match - Ferencváros

ETO - half-time state
60% leading40% draw0% trailing
Ferencváros - half-time state
25% leading75% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.2Points per match (1st half)1.5
ETOFerencváros
0.8Goals scored (1st half)0.75
ETOFerencváros
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
ETOFerencváros
1Average goals (1st half)1.25
ETOFerencváros
80%Clean sheet before half-time75%
ETOFerencváros
20%No goal before half-time50%
ETOFerencváros

After half-time (2nd half)

1.6Points per match (2nd half)1.25
ETOFerencváros
1.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
ETOFerencváros
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
ETOFerencváros
2Average goals (2nd half)1.25
ETOFerencváros
60%Clean sheet after half-time50%
ETOFerencváros
40%No goal after half-time75%
ETOFerencváros

ETO - second-half results

40% W40% D20% L
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 40%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ferencváros - second-half results

25% W50% D25% L
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

ETO - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.60
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Ferencváros - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.501.25
Goals scored / match0.80.5
Goals conceded / match0.50.8
Average goals in match1.31.3
1 goal50%50%
2 goals25%50%
3 goals25%25%
Clean sheet75%50%
No goal50%75%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 25% leading - 75% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

ETO
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
3
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
5
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Ferencváros
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-15%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

ETO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.94
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.88
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
45% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
45%

Ferencváros

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).

Teams vs league

ETOLigaFerencváros
Average goals in match▼ 3.003.15▼ 2.50
Both teams scored▼ 60%62%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 60%59%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 40%22%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▲ 80%71%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▲ 80%76%▼ 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.15
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.88
Home goals / match
1.26
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FerencvárosGoalÁdám Gyula BagiAssist: Daniel Arzani
  2. ETOYellow cardMárton Szép
  3. ETOSubstitutionOn: Bálint SelyemOff: Barnabás Bíró
  4. FerencvárosYellow cardMarius Corbu
  5. FerencvárosSubstitutionOn: Veljko BirmančevićOff: Daniel Arzani
  6. ETOYellow cardMarcell Béla Huszár

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): ETO 2 - 0 - 1 Ferencváros. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of ETO vs Ferencváros?

The NB I match finished ETO 0:3 Ferencváros. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between ETO and Ferencváros?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches ETO won 2, Ferencváros won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before ETO vs Ferencváros?

ETO score 2.20 goals per game on average and Ferencváros 1.25. The NB I average is 3.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 60% of ETO's matches and 50% of Ferencváros's.

What form are ETO and Ferencváros in?

Over the last 5 games ETO have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Ferencváros 2-1-1 (1.75 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ETO vs Ferencváros?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for ETO vs Ferencváros: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.