Étoile Carouge vs Wil: match statistics
Étoile Carouge vs Wil: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Étoile Carouge played Wil in Challenge League (Switzerland). The match was played on 17 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Étoile Carouge: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Wil: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Étoile Carouge scores 1.17 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Wil scores 1.03 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.91 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Étoile Carouge 53%, Wil 47%. Over 2.5: Étoile Carouge 53%, Wil 47%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Wil has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.42. Étoile Carouge: 13.1 shots per match, Wil: 13.0.
Match halves
Étoile Carouge: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.70. Wil: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.53.
Goals by minute
Étoile Carouge: 76-90+ (9 goals). Wil: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Challenge League: 2.91 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 1.67, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Étoile Carouge has a clear form advantage — in the last 5 matches they averaged 2.2 points (form: wwdwd), while Wil averaged 1.4 points (form: dlwwl). The home side’s attack has been more effective recently: Étoile Carouge scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches versus Wil’s 8, season-long 35 goals vs 31, and the home team’s average xG is 1.57 versus the visitors’ 1.47. Defensively the hosts are stronger — Étoile Carouge conceded only 3 goals in the last 5 matches, while Wil conceded 7, and average xG against is 1.41 (home) vs 1.80 (away), suggesting higher-quality chances for Wil. Action metrics show the hosts’ advantage in possession and shots (15 attempts per match vs 12.73) and a lower share of goalless matches (33% vs 40%), although Wil have slightly more shots on target (4.73 vs 4.13) and a higher conversion rate (7% vs 6%). Considering the average points in the last 5 matches (2.2 vs 1.4), lower xG against (1.41 vs 1.80) and superior recent goal figures (10 vs 8), I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Analysis indicates a slightly higher probability for BTTS - Yes based on several factors: both teams have season BTTS at 47%, but the league average BTTS is 54%, which increases overall chances of both teams scoring. xG shows both sides generate similar expected goals (Étoile 1.49 xG vs 1.47 xG Wil), while Wil concedes more opportunities (xG against 1.80 vs 1.44 for the home side), raising the likelihood of the visitors conceding. Conversely, Wil’s season average goals scored is only 0.87 and they fail to score in 40% of matches, which lowers BTTS probability, but Étoile have averaged 2.0 goals and conceded 0.6 in the last 5 matches (10–3 in the last 5), favoring the home side’s chance to create goals. Étoile average 13.2 shots with 4.07 on target, Wil 12.73 shots with 4.73 on target, and the home side’s shot conversion is 9% versus 7% for the visitors, suggesting an efficiency edge for Étoile. Considering the league 54% BTTS, Étoile’s home form (last 5 BTTS 60%) and Wil’s weaker season efficiency (0.87 goals and 40% of matches without scoring), the pick “Yes” looks strongest, though signals are moderate.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Calculated xG indicate total expected goals around 3.10: Étoile Carouge has xG_for 1.49 and Wil xG_against 1.80 (expected home goals ≈1.64), while Wil has xG_for 1.47 versus Carouge xG_against 1.44 (expected away goals ≈1.46). In the last 5 matches Carouge averaged 2.0 goals scored and 0.6 conceded, and Wil averaged 1.6 scored and 1.4 conceded, giving a combined 3.6 goals in form and confirming an offensive tendency. Season stats show over 1.5 in 60% of home matches and 80% of away matches, over 2.5 occurs in 47% for each team, and over 3.5 is 40% for hosts and 27% for guests. The league averages 2.91 goals per match, so the expected 3.10 exceeds the league average by 0.19, supporting the over option, especially over 1.5. Based on this I recommend a bet on Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (estimates: over 1.5 = 85%/under 15%; over 2.5 = 64%/36%; over 3.5 = 38%/62%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw appears most likely: Étoile Carouge have been level at the break in 60% of their matches this season and Wil in 40%, yielding roughly a 50% probability of a tie after 45 minutes. The hosts, however, hold the edge in the second half — they average 1.6 goals after the interval versus Wil’s 1.2, and their last 5 home results read W W D W D with a 60% win rate. Supporting the hosts are underlying numbers: Étoile’s xG is 1.49 while Wil concedes an average of 1.8 xG per match (1.49 vs 1.8), and the hosts convert shots at 9% compared to the visitors’ 7%. Still, Étoile keep clean sheets at half-time frequently — they’ve been level without conceding at the break in 67% of games — which suppresses first-half goals and boosts the likelihood of a half-time draw. Taking this into account I favour X/1 as the primary scenario (33%), with 1/1 as an alternative at 16% and X/X at 15%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Étoile Carouge | Wil | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Étoile Carouge is 57% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Étoile Carouge · 1.4 pts / match - Wil
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Étoile Carouge is 14% better for: goals scored per match.
1.17 goals / match - Étoile Carouge · 1.03 goals / match - Wil
Étoile Carouge is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.4 goals / match - Étoile Carouge · 1.5 goals / match - Wil
Étoile Carouge scores in 67% of matches (20 of 30 matches), while Wil keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).
Wil scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Étoile Carouge keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Étoile Carouge
Over / Under - Wil
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Étoile Carouge - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Wil - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Étoile Carouge
Wil
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Challenge League).
Teams vs league
| Étoile Carouge | Liga | Wil | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.57 | 2.91 | ▼ 2.53 |
| Both teams scored | • 53% | 54% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 53% | 56% | ▼ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 27% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 68% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 79% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Étoile Carouge 1 - 1 - 1 Wil. Average goals 1.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Étoile Carouge vs Wil?
The Challenge League match finished Étoile Carouge 2:0 Wil. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Étoile Carouge and Wil?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Étoile Carouge won 1, Wil won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Étoile Carouge vs Wil?
Étoile Carouge score 1.17 goals per game on average and Wil 1.03. The Challenge League average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Étoile Carouge's matches and 47% of Wil's.
What form are Étoile Carouge and Wil in?
Over the last 5 games Étoile Carouge have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Wil 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Étoile Carouge vs Wil?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


