Portugal - Liga 3Data current as of 23 July 2026

Fafe vs AD Marco 09: match statistics

Fafe crest
Fafe
1 : 1half-time 1:0
AD Marco 09 crest
AD Marco 09
165%(1.67)
X22%(3.49)
213%(4.87)

Fafe displays vastly superior home form with a 64% win rate and an impressive goal difference (+7) at home. The hosts have won four of their last five home matches, confirming their solidity at their own stadium. AD Marco 09 performs very poorly on the road, winning only 9% of away games and failing to score in 55% of fixtures. The difference in average xG (1.98 for Fafe vs 1.45 for the visitors) and the possession advantage (56% vs 48%) further support the hosts. AD Marco 09's weak form in their last five matches (0.8 PPG) and a negative goal difference (-7) away make a Fafe victory the most likely scenario.

Fafe vs AD Marco 09: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Fafe play AD Marco 09 in Liga 3 (Portugal). The match date is 15 March 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Fafe: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. AD Marco 09: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Fafe scores 1.21 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. AD Marco 09 scores 0.82 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Fafe 50%, AD Marco 09 46%. Over 2.5: Fafe 39%, AD Marco 09 36%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots and style

Fafe has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.40. Fafe: 11.4 shots per match, AD Marco 09: 11.1.

Match halves

Fafe: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.71. AD Marco 09: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.39.

Goals by minute

Fafe: 61-75 (7 goals). AD Marco 09: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 3: 2.23 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-2-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 33%.

Match description

Fafe displays vastly superior home form with a 64% win rate and an impressive goal difference (+7) at home. The hosts have won four of their last five home matches, confirming their solidity at their own stadium. AD Marco 09 performs very poorly on the road, winning only 9% of away games and failing to score in 55% of fixtures. The difference in average xG (1.98 for Fafe vs 1.45 for the visitors) and the possession advantage (56% vs 48%) further support the hosts. AD Marco 09's weak form in their last five matches (0.8 PPG) and a negative goal difference (-7) away make a Fafe victory the most likely scenario.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
FafeAD Marco 09
9Shots16
FafeAD Marco 09
2Shots on target6
FafeAD Marco 09
1xG1.83
FafeAD Marco 09
4Corners7
FafeAD Marco 09
38Dangerous attacks55
FafeAD Marco 09
-1Fouls-1
FafeAD Marco 09
2Cards2
FafeAD Marco 09

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.21Goals scored / match0.82
FafeAD Marco 09
1.11Goals conceded / match1.11
FafeAD Marco 09
53%Average possession50%
FafeAD Marco 09
4.43Shots on target / match4.29
FafeAD Marco 09

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.43Shots per match11.14
FafeAD Marco 09
4.43Shots on target4.29
FafeAD Marco 09
10.6%Shot conversion7.4%
FafeAD Marco 09
53%Possession50%
FafeAD Marco 09
1.48xG for1.4
FafeAD Marco 09
1.2xG against1.27
FafeAD Marco 09

Shooting quality

Fafe: BalancedAD Marco 09: Balanced
FafeAD Marco 09
Accuracy (shots on target)39%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.19

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AD Marco 09 is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Fafe · 1.8 pts / match - AD Marco 09

Fafe
WWLLD
Season result split
36% W32% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-9-9
1.39 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
AD Marco 09
DDWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
25% W43% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-12-9
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-7-6
Last 5 away
0-4-1
LDDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 0.95BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fafe is 48% better for: goals scored per match.

1.21 goals / match - Fafe · 0.82 goals / match - AD Marco 09

Fafe scoring profile: strong

Fafe scores in 71% of matches (20 of 28 matches), while AD Marco 09 keeps a clean sheet in 36% (10 of 28 matches).

AD Marco 09 scoring profile: strong

AD Marco 09 scores in 61% of matches (17 of 28 matches), while Fafe keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 matches).

34Goals scored (season)23
FafeAD Marco 09
31Goals conceded (season)31
FafeAD Marco 09
2.32Average goals in match1.93
FafeAD Marco 09
5Goals scored (last 5)4
FafeAD Marco 09
5Goals conceded (last 5)2
FafeAD Marco 09

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal61%
FafeAD Marco 09
32%2 goals21%
FafeAD Marco 09
14%3 goals0%
FafeAD Marco 09
4%4 goals0%
FafeAD Marco 09

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal64%
FafeAD Marco 09
29%2 goals36%
FafeAD Marco 09
7%3 goals11%
FafeAD Marco 09
4%4 goals0%
FafeAD Marco 09

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time21%
FafeAD Marco 09
4%BTTS in both halves4%
FafeAD Marco 09
18%Scored in both halves14%
FafeAD Marco 09

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
FafeAD Marco 09
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
FafeAD Marco 09
40%BTTS - last 520%
FafeAD Marco 09

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
FafeAD Marco 09
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
FafeAD Marco 09
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
FafeAD Marco 09

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
FafeAD Marco 09
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
FafeAD Marco 09
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
FafeAD Marco 09

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fafe is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - Fafe · 1.14 pts / match - AD Marco 09

Fafe - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
AD Marco 09 - half-time state
18% leading61% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)1.14
FafeAD Marco 09
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.43
FafeAD Marco 09
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
FafeAD Marco 09
0.93Average goals (1st half)0.93
FafeAD Marco 09
68%Clean sheet before half-time61%
FafeAD Marco 09
61%No goal before half-time61%
FafeAD Marco 09

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.11
FafeAD Marco 09
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.39
FafeAD Marco 09
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
FafeAD Marco 09
1.39Average goals (2nd half)1
FafeAD Marco 09
50%Clean sheet after half-time57%
FafeAD Marco 09
50%No goal after half-time64%
FafeAD Marco 09

Fafe - second-half results

36% W21% R43% P
35
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding144%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

AD Marco 09 - second-half results

25% W36% R39% P
32
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding139%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Fafe - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
AD Marco 09 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.21.0
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Fafe
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
3
4
16-30
6
4
31-45
6
4
46-60
7
7
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

AD Marco 09
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
1
3
16-30
6
8
31-45
2
5
46-60
3
7
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-53%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Fafe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

AD Marco 09

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.62
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

FafeLigaAD Marco 09
Average goals in match 2.322.23 1.93
Both teams scored 50%49% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%40% 36%
Clean sheets 32%31% 36%
Goal before half-time 57%66% 57%
Goal after half-time 86%74% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.23
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Fafe 0 - 2 - 1 AD Marco 09. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Fafe vs AD Marco 09?

The Liga 3 match finished Fafe 1:1 AD Marco 09. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Fafe and AD Marco 09?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Fafe won 0, AD Marco 09 won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Fafe vs AD Marco 09?

Fafe score 1.21 goals per game on average and AD Marco 09 0.82. The Liga 3 average is 2.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Fafe's matches and 46% of AD Marco 09's.

What form are Fafe and AD Marco 09 in?

Over the last 5 games Fafe have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and AD Marco 09 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fafe vs AD Marco 09?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.