Portugal - Liga 3Parque Municipal dos Desportos de FafeData current as of 14 October 2026

Fafe vs CD Trofense: match statistics

Fafe crest
Fafe
2 : 2half-time 0:1
CD Trofense crest
CD Trofense

Fafe vs CD Trofense: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Fafe played CD Trofense in Liga 3 (Portugal). The match was played on 11 October 2026. Venue: Parque Municipal dos Desportos de Fafe. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Fafe: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. CD Trofense: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Fafe scores 1.60 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. CD Trofense scores 0.40 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.46 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Fafe 60%, CD Trofense 20%. Over 2.5: Fafe 60%, CD Trofense 20%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Fafe has higher xG: 1.45 vs 0.86. Fafe: 12.0 shots per match, CD Trofense: 6.6.

Match halves

Fafe: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.00. CD Trofense: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.20.

Goals by minute

Fafe: 46-60 (3 goals). CD Trofense: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 3: 2.46 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 4.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Fafe have a clear edge over their last five matches: they won 3, scored 10 goals and conceded 3, while CD Trofense recorded 1 win, scored 3 and conceded 11. At home, Fafe create chances worth an average xG of 1.64, whereas Trofense manage just 0.81 xG away and have yet to score on the road. The hosts average 15 shots per home match, compared with 6.5 for the visitors away from home, boosting Fafe’s chances of breaking through their opponents’ defence. Caution is still warranted, however: both of Fafe’s home matches so far have ended in draws, with the team averaging just 0.5 goals in those games. Even so, their greater chance creation and significantly better recent results point to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest indication against both teams scoring is CD Trofense’s away record: an average of 0.0 goals scored, with no goals in 100% of these matches. The visitors average just 1 shot on target away from home, and their xG stands at 0.81, further limiting their chances of scoring. Fafe do concede an average of 1.67 goals at home, but have let in just 3 goals across their last 5 matches overall, while Trofense have scored 3 in that period. The hosts are clearly more likely to score, having netted 10 goals in their last 5 matches compared with the visitors’ 3, but a BTTS - Yes bet also requires a Trofense goal. Therefore, the more likely scenario is that at least one team fails to score, even though 40% of each team’s last 5 matches saw both sides find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Fafe have averaged 2.0 goals in their last 5 matches, while Trofense have conceded 2.2 over the same period, giving the hosts a clear edge in attacking potential. However, the visitors have scored just 0.6 goals per game across their last 5 matches and failed to score in any of the away games included in the statistics. In those same statistics, under 3.5 goals landed in 67% of Fafe’s home matches and 100% of Trofense’s away matches. The hosts’ recent form increases the risk of three goals, but with a projected total of 2.35 goals and the visitors’ limited scoring efficiency, Under 3.5 goals remains the strongest pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time followed by a Fafe win is the most likely outcome: CD Trofense were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches and did not lead in any of them. The visitors have also failed to score in both of their away matches so far, limiting the chances of them taking the lead in the first half. Recent form over the last 5 matches points to a later home victory: Fafe won 3 times and scored an average of 2 goals, while Trofense lost 3 times and conceded an average of 2.2 goals. The difference after the break is particularly notable—Fafe scored an average of 1.2 goals in the second half, while Trofense conceded 1.2. However, this pick carries some uncertainty, as Fafe did not lead at the break in any of the 3 home matches considered and were trailing in 2 of them.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

68Possession (%)32
FafeCD Trofense
9Shots4
FafeCD Trofense
5Shots on target3
FafeCD Trofense
1.56xG0.86
FafeCD Trofense
4Corners4
FafeCD Trofense
88Dangerous attacks53
FafeCD Trofense
19Fouls16
FafeCD Trofense
3Cards2
FafeCD Trofense

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.6Goals scored / match0.4
FafeCD Trofense
0.8Goals conceded / match1.4
FafeCD Trofense
49%Average possession43%
FafeCD Trofense
4.4Shots on target / match1.6
FafeCD Trofense

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12Shots per match6.6
FafeCD Trofense
4.4Shots on target1.6
FafeCD Trofense
13.3%Shot conversion6.1%
FafeCD Trofense
49%Possession43%
FafeCD Trofense
1.45xG for0.86
FafeCD Trofense
1.36xG against1.67
FafeCD Trofense

Shooting quality

Fafe: Efficient finishingCD Trofense: Balanced
FafeCD Trofense
Accuracy (shots on target)37%24%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fafe is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Fafe · 0.8 pts / match - CD Trofense

Fafe
DWDWL
Season result split
40% W40% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-0
Last 5 at home
0-2-0
DD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
CD Trofense
LLWDL
Season result split
20% W20% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 away
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.86Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fafe is 300% better for: goals scored per match.

1.6 goals / match - Fafe · 0.4 goals / match - CD Trofense

Fafe is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.8 goals / match - Fafe · 1.4 goals / match - CD Trofense

Fafe scoring profile: strong

Fafe scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

CD Trofense scoring profile: mixed

CD Trofense scores in 40% of matches (2 of 5 matches), while Fafe keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

8Goals scored (season)2
FafeCD Trofense
4Goals conceded (season)7
FafeCD Trofense
2.4Average goals in match1.8
FafeCD Trofense
8Goals scored (last 5)2
FafeCD Trofense
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
FafeCD Trofense

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal40%
FafeCD Trofense
40%2 goals0%
FafeCD Trofense
40%3 goals0%
FafeCD Trofense
0%4 goals0%
FafeCD Trofense

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal60%
FafeCD Trofense
20%2 goals40%
FafeCD Trofense
0%3 goals20%
FafeCD Trofense
0%4 goals20%
FafeCD Trofense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time20%
FafeCD Trofense
0%BTTS in both halves0%
FafeCD Trofense
40%Scored in both halves0%
FafeCD Trofense

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
FafeCD Trofense
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
FafeCD Trofense
60%BTTS - last 520%
FafeCD Trofense

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
FafeCD Trofense
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
FafeCD Trofense
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
FafeCD Trofense

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
FafeCD Trofense
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
FafeCD Trofense
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
FafeCD Trofense

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fafe is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / match - Fafe · 0.4 pts / match - CD Trofense

Fafe - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
CD Trofense - half-time state
0% leading40% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per match (1st half)0.4
FafeCD Trofense
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.2
FafeCD Trofense
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)1
FafeCD Trofense
1Average goals (1st half)1.2
FafeCD Trofense
60%Clean sheet before half-time40%
FafeCD Trofense
40%No goal before half-time80%
FafeCD Trofense

After half-time (2nd half)

1.8Points per match (2nd half)1
FafeCD Trofense
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.2
FafeCD Trofense
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
FafeCD Trofense
1.4Average goals (2nd half)0.6
FafeCD Trofense
60%Clean sheet after half-time60%
FafeCD Trofense
40%No goal after half-time80%
FafeCD Trofense

Fafe - second-half results

40% W60% D0% L
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CD Trofense - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.40
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.6

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fafe - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
CD Trofense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Fafe
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
3
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

CD Trofense
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.10
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+114%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Fafe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.71
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

CD Trofense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.81
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
37%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

FafeLigaCD Trofense
Average goals in match• 2.402.46▼ 1.80
Both teams scored▲ 60%47%▼ 20%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 60%47%▼ 20%
Clean sheets▲ 40%32%▲ 40%
Goal before half-time▲ 80%68%▼ 60%
Goal after half-time▼ 60%69%▼ 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.46
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FafeSubstitutionOn: Kuffour Edwin AsamoahOff: João Dinis Vilela Gama Ribeiro Faria
  2. CD TrofenseYellow cardLucca Carvalho Alves Lopes
  3. FafeGoalMário Nuno Leite Correia
  4. CD TrofenseSubstitutionOn: Diogo Rafael Pereira NunesOff: Joel Oliveira
  5. CD TrofenseSubstitutionOn: Kauã Oliveira SouzaOff: Feliz Edgar Neto Vaz

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Fafe 0 - 0 - 2 CD Trofense. Average goals 4.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

AD Fafe
1 : 2
CD Trofense
CD Trofense
5 : 1
AD Fafe

FAQ

What was the result of Fafe vs CD Trofense?

The Liga 3 match finished Fafe 2:2 CD Trofense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Fafe and CD Trofense?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Fafe won 0, CD Trofense won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Fafe vs CD Trofense?

Fafe score 1.60 goals per game on average and CD Trofense 0.40. The Liga 3 average is 2.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Fafe's matches and 20% of CD Trofense's.

What form are Fafe and CD Trofense in?

Over the last 5 games Fafe have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and CD Trofense 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fafe vs CD Trofense?

The statistical background for Fafe vs CD Trofense — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.