Farense vs Sporting CP II: match statistics
Farense vs Sporting CP II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Farense played Sporting CP II in LigaPro (Portugal). The match was played on 11 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Farense: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Sporting CP II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Farense scores 0.82 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. Sporting CP II scores 1.43 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.43 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Farense 36%, Sporting CP II 39%. Over 2.5: Farense 32%, Sporting CP II 50%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Farense has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.40. Farense: 12.8 shots per match, Sporting CP II: 11.6.
Match halves
Farense: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.54. Sporting CP II: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.71.
Goals by minute
Farense: 76-90+ (9 goals). Sporting CP II: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
LigaPro: 2.43 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sporting CP II are favorites based on 6th position in the table versus Farense’s 17th and a +5 away goal differential compared to the hosts’ -8 at home. Farense have serious finishing issues: on average 0.79 goals per home game, a conversion rate of 6% and as many as 64% of home matches without a goal, despite generating 13.71 shots and 4.93 on target per game. Sporting away average is 1.21 goals, a higher conversion of 10% and they concede only 0.86 goals on the road; their away xG is 1.36 versus the hosts’ xG of 1.65 (hosts have higher xG but it does not translate into goals). In the last 5 matches Farense have 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, averaging 1.0 point per game, while Sporting have 1 win and 4 losses, averaging 0.6 points per game, giving a minimal form edge to the hosts. Considering the visitors’ superior defense (0.86 conceded away), the hosts’ low efficiency and the differences in conversion rate, I tip an away win, though I expect a low score and a realistic possibility of a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project the more likely outcome is 'BTTS = No' (62% vs 38%). This season Farense averages 1.64 goals scored and 1.14 conceded per match, Sporting CP II averages 1.21 scored and 0.86 conceded, with BTTS rates of 43% and 36% respectively (league average 47%) — below half of fixtures. In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred only in 40% for both teams, with averages of 0.6 goals scored and 0.8 (Farense)/1.2 (Sporting II) goals conceded, indicating suppressed offensive form. Despite similar xG_for (1.44 vs 1.36) and Farense’s edge in shots on target (5.0 vs 3.79), both sides have xG_against around 1.45, and the league records as many as 63% clean sheets, which strengthens the No Goal signal. Considering sub-50% BTTS rates (43%/36%), 40% in L5 and the high clean sheet frequency (63%), the 'No' selection is the strongest signal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Data indicate a moderately high goal potential: Farense has xG 1.44 and a seasonal goals average of 1.64, Sporting II has xG 1.36 and a seasonal average of 1.21 — combined xG is 2.80, combined seasonal averages 2.85. Farense averages 5.0 shots on target with a 14% conversion, Sporting II records 3.79 shots on target with a 10% conversion, so I project 1.52 goals for the home side and 1.30 for the visitors, total 2.82. Seasonal over shares show over 1.5 occurred in 64% of Farense’s matches and 57% of Sporting II’s, while over 2.5 in 57%/43%; conversely, over 3.5 is only 29%/14% — hence over 2.5 has moderate backing (≈58%), and over 3.5 is unlikely (≈22%). Additionally, in the last 5 matches both teams averaged 0.6 goals each (1.2 combined), which reduces confidence in higher overs and increases relevance of under 3.5. Therefore I recommend the strongest signal as under 3.5 (78% probability), while over 1.5 remains a reasonable but less certain option (68%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Farense is the clear favorite to lead at the break — they led at half-time in 7 of 14 home matches (50%), scoring an average of 0.86 goals by the break and conceding 0.50, while Sporting CP II led in only 3 of 14 (21%) and average 0.57 goals by half-time. The hosts also have better shots on target figures (5.0 vs 3.79) and higher shot efficiency (14% vs 10%), and total xG is 1.44 versus 1.36 in favor of Farense, all of which supports the hosts leading after 45 minutes. However, Sporting shows the advantage after the break — they average 1.64 points in second halves versus Farense’s 1.29 and win 43% of second halves compared to the hosts’ 28%, increasing the likelihood of a turnaround. Additionally, Sporting scored 5 goals in minutes 76–90 while Farense conceded 8 in that same interval, which creates a logical scenario of Farense leading at half-time and being pegged back after the change of ends. Therefore my strongest signal is 1/X with an estimated probability of 23%, with 1/1 (18%) and 2/2 (11%) as the main alternatives.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Farense | Sporting CP II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.18 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Farense is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Farense · 0.6 pts / match - Sporting CP II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sporting CP II is 74% better for: goals scored per match.
0.82 goals / match - Farense · 1.43 goals / match - Sporting CP II
Sporting CP II is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.21 goals / match - Farense · 1 goals / match - Sporting CP II
Farense scores in 50% of matches (14 of 28 matches), while Sporting CP II keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 matches).
Sporting CP II scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while Farense keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Farense
Over / Under - Sporting CP II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sporting CP II is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.96 pts / match - Farense · 1.36 pts / match - Sporting CP II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Farense - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Sporting CP II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Farense
Sporting CP II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LigaPro).
Teams vs league
| Farense | Liga | Sporting CP II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.04 | 2.43 | • 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 47% | ▼ 39% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 32% | 44% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | • 32% | 32% | • 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 64% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 77% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Sporting CP IIGoalSamuel Loureiro Carvalho JustoAssist: Eduardo Manuel Freitas Monteiro Ferreira Felicíssimo
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Farense 0 - 0 - 1 Sporting CP II. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Farense vs Sporting CP II?
The LigaPro match finished Farense 2:1 Sporting CP II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Farense vs Sporting CP II?
Farense score 0.82 goals per game on average and Sporting CP II 1.43. The LigaPro average is 2.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Farense's matches and 39% of Sporting CP II's.
What form are Farense and Sporting CP II in?
Over the last 5 games Farense have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Sporting CP II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Farense vs Sporting CP II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


