El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónEstadio Óscar Alberto QuiteñoData current as of 22 October 2026

Match suspended or postponed

The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

FAS vs Isidro Metapán: match statistics

FAS vs Isidro Metapán: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FAS play Isidro Metapán in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context. Venue: Estadio Óscar Alberto Quiteño.

Current form

FAS: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Isidro Metapán: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

FAS scores 1.80 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Isidro Metapán scores 1.53 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.68 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FAS 60%, Isidro Metapán 47%. Over 2.5: FAS 53%, Isidro Metapán 53%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

FAS has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.69. FAS: 11.9 shots per match, Isidro Metapán: 10.6.

Match halves

FAS: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.93. Isidro Metapán: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.07.

Goals by minute

FAS: 76-90+ (10 goals). Isidro Metapán: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 40%.

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.8Goals scored / match1.53
FASIsidro Metapán
1Goals conceded / match1.13
FASIsidro Metapán
57%Average possession55%
FASIsidro Metapán
7.2Shots on target / match6.2
FASIsidro Metapán

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.93Shots per match10.6
FASIsidro Metapán
7.2Shots on target6.2
FASIsidro Metapán
15.1%Shot conversion14.5%
FASIsidro Metapán
57%Possession55%
FASIsidro Metapán
1.71xG for1.69
FASIsidro Metapán
1.38xG against1.29
FASIsidro Metapán

Shooting quality

FAS: Efficient finishingIsidro Metapán: Efficient finishing
FASIsidro Metapán
Accuracy (shots on target)60%58%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FAS
WDWWL
Season result split
60% W20% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-3
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Isidro Metapán
DWWLW
Season result split
60% W13% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-2-4
1.93 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FAS is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

1.8 goals / match - FAS · 1.53 goals / match - Isidro Metapán

FAS is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - FAS · 1.13 goals / match - Isidro Metapán

FAS scoring profile: very strong

FAS scores in 93% of matches (14 of 15 matches), while Isidro Metapán keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

Isidro Metapán scoring profile: strong

Isidro Metapán scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

27Goals scored (season)23
FASIsidro Metapán
15Goals conceded (season)17
FASIsidro Metapán
2.8Average goals in match2.67
FASIsidro Metapán
9Goals scored (last 5)8
FASIsidro Metapán
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
FASIsidro Metapán

How often they score at least...

93%1 goal67%
FASIsidro Metapán
53%2 goals60%
FASIsidro Metapán
27%3 goals20%
FASIsidro Metapán
7%4 goals7%
FASIsidro Metapán

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
FASIsidro Metapán
27%2 goals33%
FASIsidro Metapán
7%3 goals13%
FASIsidro Metapán
0%4 goals0%
FASIsidro Metapán

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time13%
FASIsidro Metapán
7%BTTS in both halves7%
FASIsidro Metapán
20%Scored in both halves33%
FASIsidro Metapán

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
FASIsidro Metapán
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
FASIsidro Metapán
80%BTTS - last 540%
FASIsidro Metapán

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
FASIsidro Metapán
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
FASIsidro Metapán
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
FASIsidro Metapán

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
FASIsidro Metapán
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
FASIsidro Metapán
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
FASIsidro Metapán

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FAS is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / match - FAS · 1.2 pts / match - Isidro Metapán

FAS - half-time state
40% leading47% draw13% trailing
Isidro Metapán - half-time state
27% leading40% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)1.2
FASIsidro Metapán
0.87Goals scored (1st half)0.47
FASIsidro Metapán
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
FASIsidro Metapán
1.33Average goals (1st half)0.93
FASIsidro Metapán
60%Clean sheet before half-time53%
FASIsidro Metapán
47%No goal before half-time60%
FASIsidro Metapán

After half-time (2nd half)

1.6Points per match (2nd half)1.8
FASIsidro Metapán
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)1.07
FASIsidro Metapán
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
FASIsidro Metapán
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.73
FASIsidro Metapán
60%Clean sheet after half-time53%
FASIsidro Metapán
40%No goal after half-time40%
FASIsidro Metapán

FAS - second-half results

47% W20% D33% L
25
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Isidro Metapán - second-half results

47% W40% D13% L
18
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding222%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FAS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Isidro Metapán - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.82.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FAS
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
3
2
16-30
7
1
31-45
0
3
46-60
4
2
61-75
10
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Isidro Metapán
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
3
1
16-30
2
3
31-45
2
1
46-60
5
0
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.73
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FAS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

Isidro Metapán

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
39% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
39%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

FASLigaIsidro Metapán
Average goals in match▲ 2.802.68• 2.67
Both teams scored▲ 60%55%▼ 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 53%52%• 53%
Clean sheets▲ 33%28%▲ 33%
Goal before half-time• 67%68%▲ 73%
Goal after half-time▲ 80%76%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.68
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / match
1.20
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): FAS 3 - 1 - 1 Isidro Metapán. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 40% matches.

Isidro Metapán
2 : 0
FAS
Isidro Metapán
0 : 3
FAS
FAS
2 : 2
Isidro Metapán
Isidro Metapán
2 : 3
FAS
FAS
1 : 0
Isidro Metapán