Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Fasil Ketema vs Mekelle Kenema: match statistics

Fasil Ketema crest
Fasil Ketema
0 : 3half-time 0:0
Mekelle Kenema crest
Mekelle Kenema

Fasil Ketema vs Mekelle Kenema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Fasil Ketema played Mekelle Kenema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 18 April 2026. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

Fasil Ketema: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Mekelle Kenema: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Fasil Ketema scores 0.70 and concedes 0.56 goals per match. Mekelle Kenema scores 0.78 and concedes 1.04. League average: 1.80 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Fasil Ketema 26%, Mekelle Kenema 44%. Over 2.5: Fasil Ketema 11%, Mekelle Kenema 37%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Mekelle Kenema has higher xG: 1.17 vs 1.12. Fasil Ketema: 6.9 shots per match, Mekelle Kenema: 6.3.

Match halves

Fasil Ketema: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.41. Mekelle Kenema: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Fasil Ketema: 31-45+ (4 goals). Mekelle Kenema: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.80 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Fasil Ketema are favorites in this match: they sit 4th in the table versus Mekelle Kenema’s 19th place, and over the last 5 matches they have a record of 2 wins and 3 draws (dddww), averaging 1.8 points per match in that period, while Mekelle have 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses (ldllw) and average 0.8 points per match. In home metrics Fasil score 0.69 goals per game and concede only 0.54, keeping a clean sheet in 62% of home matches; Mekelle on the road average 0.46 goals scored and concede 0.85 per game, and fail to score in 69% of away fixtures. Quality of chances is similar — average xG is 1.07 for the hosts versus 1.11 for the visitors — but the hosts convert better at home: a conversion rate of 10% and 2.69 shots on target per match versus 7% and 2.31 for Mekelle, which explains the higher actual goal output. Additionally, Fasil have conceded only 1 goal in their last 5 matches while Mekelle have conceded 6, confirming the hosts’ defensive edge and increasing the probability of a narrow home win. On that basis I tip a home victory, with the chance of a draw limited by the visitors’ poor away efficiency.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I project No BTTS as more likely — 70% vs 30%. Mekelle Kenema averages just 0.46 goals per season and 0.4 in the last 5 matches, registering 2.31 shots on target and a shot conversion of 7%, which materially limits their scoring probability. Fasil Ketema posts 1.07 goals per match with xG 1.22 and 3.29 shots on target with a 17% conversion, so the hosts are more likely to score but that alone does not guarantee BTTS. Over the season the away side conceded 28 goals and have conceded 6 in the last 5 (1.2 avg), while the hosts conceded 15 this season and only 1 in the last 5 (0.2 avg), pointing to a higher probability of a one-sided scoreline. Although the home team has a season BTTS rate of 71%, the visitors have only 15% BTTS matches and both teams have 20% BTTS in their last 5 — this asymmetry and the visitors’ poor scoring form support No BTTS.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Expected goals were calculated using xG: home xG is 1.22, Mekelle’s defensive xG is 1.13 — their average gives 1.175 (rounded to 1.18) for Fasil Ketema; Mekelle xG is 1.11 versus the home defense xG 1.32 — average 1.215 (rounded to 1.22) for Mekelle; total ≈2.39 (rounded 2.40). A Poisson model with λ≈2.39 yields probabilities: Over 1.5 ≈69% (Under 31%), Over 2.5 ≈43% (Under 57%) and Over 3.5 ≈22% (Under 78%). Historically the home side more often features in matches with at least 2 goals — at home 71% of their matches exceed 1.5 goals, and in 71% of home matches both teams scored; the home team’s goals scored average is 1.07 versus 0.46 for visitors. Additionally Fasil averages 3.29 shots on target with a 17% conversion rate versus Mekelle’s 2.31 and 7%; the visitors conceded 6 goals in their last 5 matches and have a recent defensive xG of 1.44, which increases the goal tempo for this fixture. Considering the expected total of 2.40 goals, clear home offensive advantage and Mekelle’s weaker defense in the last 5 matches, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (69%), hence the recommendation to bet on over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Half-time statistics indicate a draw: the home side are level at the break in 50% of matches, with this rate rising to 80% over the last 5 fixtures, while visitors are level at half-time in 38%; average goals at the interval are 0.57 for hosts and 0.31 for guests. In the second half the statistical advantage lies with Fasil Ketema — average points/impact after the break are 1.21 for the home team versus 0.85 for the away side, and in the last 5 matches these figures are 1.4 vs 0.6. The hosts create more chances and are more efficient: xG 1.22 compared to 1.11, shots on target 3.29 vs 2.31 and conversion 17% versus 7%, so they have better prospects of scoring the decisive goal after the break. Additionally, the hosts win second halves in 21% of cases versus 8% for their opponents, which confirms they more often erase a deficit or decide the outcome after the interval. Therefore the strongest market signal is Half-Time/Full-Time: draw at half-time and home win at full-time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
7Shots6
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0Shots on target3
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
1.24xG1.2
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
6Corners3
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
109Dangerous attacks84
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
-1Fouls-1
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
-1Cards-1
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0.7Goals scored / match0.78
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0.56Goals conceded / match1.04
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
45%Average possession48%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
2.41Shots on target / match2.81
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.89Shots per match6.3
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
2.41Shots on target2.81
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
10.2%Shot conversion12.4%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
45%Possession48%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
1.12xG for1.17
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
1.09xG against1.23
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

Shooting quality

Fasil Ketema: BalancedMekelle Kenema: Balanced
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
Accuracy (shots on target)35%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.19
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fasil Ketema is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Fasil Ketema · 0.8 pts / match - Mekelle Kenema

Fasil Ketema
DDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
37% W44% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-12-5
1.56 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-4-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.01Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%
Mekelle Kenema
LDLLW
Season result split
19% W44% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-12-10
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-6
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.02Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mekelle Kenema is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

0.7 goals / match - Fasil Ketema · 0.78 goals / match - Mekelle Kenema

Fasil Ketema is 86% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.56 goals / match - Fasil Ketema · 1.04 goals / match - Mekelle Kenema

Fasil Ketema scoring profile: strong

Fasil Ketema scores in 59% of matches (16 of 27 matches), while Mekelle Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 matches).

Mekelle Kenema scoring profile: more difficult

Mekelle Kenema scores in 56% of matches (15 of 27 matches), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 63% (17 of 27 matches).

19Goals scored (season)21
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
15Goals conceded (season)28
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
1.26Average goals in match1.81
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
3Goals scored (last 5)2
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
1Goals conceded (last 5)6
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal56%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
7%2 goals22%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
4%3 goals0%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0%4 goals0%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

How often they concede at least...

37%1 goal67%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
15%2 goals30%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
4%3 goals7%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0%4 goals0%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

42%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time15%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
4%BTTS in both halves4%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
4%Scored in both halves19%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

BTTS and goal count

11%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
20%BTTS - last 520%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

30%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
7%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

2nd half

56%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fasil Ketema is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - Fasil Ketema · 1.22 pts / match - Mekelle Kenema

Fasil Ketema - half-time state
22% leading74% draw4% trailing
Mekelle Kenema - half-time state
26% leading44% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)1.22
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0.3Goals scored (1st half)0.44
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0.11Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0.41Average goals (1st half)0.93
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
89%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
74%No goal before half-time59%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

After half-time (2nd half)

1.22Points per match (2nd half)1.04
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0.41Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0.85Average goals (2nd half)0.89
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
67%Clean sheet after half-time59%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
63%No goal after half-time67%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

Fasil Ketema - second-half results

22% W56% R22% P
38
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding168%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mekelle Kenema - second-half results

15% W59% R26% P
33
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding73%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 19%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fasil Ketema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.20.6
1 goal20%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Mekelle Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Fasil Ketema
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
4
0
31-45
3
3
46-60
4
4
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Mekelle Kenema
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
6
5
16-30
3
5
31-45
4
6
46-60
2
4
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+30%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Fasil Ketema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.53
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Mekelle Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Fasil KetemaLigaMekelle Kenema
Average goals in match 1.261.80 1.81
Both teams scored 26%42% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 11%28% 37%
Clean sheets 63%39% 33%
Goal before half-time 30%55% 67%
Goal after half-time 56%58% 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.80
Average goals per match
42%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
0.89
Home goals / match
0.91
Away goals / match
+-2%
Home attack advantage
+-2%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
55%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Arafat Mohammad Fahid Al Haj Ibrahim⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Mekelle KenemaGoalArafat Mohammad Fahid Al Haj Ibrahim

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Fasil Ketema 0 - 1 - 0 Mekelle Kenema. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Fasil Ketema vs Mekelle Kenema?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Fasil Ketema 0:3 Mekelle Kenema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Fasil Ketema vs Mekelle Kenema?

Fasil Ketema score 0.70 goals per game on average and Mekelle Kenema 0.78. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Fasil Ketema's matches and 44% of Mekelle Kenema's.

What form are Fasil Ketema and Mekelle Kenema in?

Over the last 5 games Fasil Ketema have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Mekelle Kenema 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fasil Ketema vs Mekelle Kenema?

The statistical background for Fasil Ketema vs Mekelle Kenema — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.