Fasil Ketema vs Mekelle Kenema: match statistics
Fasil Ketema vs Mekelle Kenema: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Fasil Ketema played Mekelle Kenema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 18 April 2026. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
Fasil Ketema: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Mekelle Kenema: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Fasil Ketema scores 0.70 and concedes 0.56 goals per match. Mekelle Kenema scores 0.78 and concedes 1.04. League average: 1.80 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Fasil Ketema 26%, Mekelle Kenema 44%. Over 2.5: Fasil Ketema 11%, Mekelle Kenema 37%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 28%.
xG, shots and style
Mekelle Kenema has higher xG: 1.17 vs 1.12. Fasil Ketema: 6.9 shots per match, Mekelle Kenema: 6.3.
Match halves
Fasil Ketema: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.41. Mekelle Kenema: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.33.
Goals by minute
Fasil Ketema: 31-45+ (4 goals). Mekelle Kenema: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ethiopia Premier League: 1.80 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 28%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Fasil Ketema are favorites in this match: they sit 4th in the table versus Mekelle Kenema’s 19th place, and over the last 5 matches they have a record of 2 wins and 3 draws (dddww), averaging 1.8 points per match in that period, while Mekelle have 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses (ldllw) and average 0.8 points per match. In home metrics Fasil score 0.69 goals per game and concede only 0.54, keeping a clean sheet in 62% of home matches; Mekelle on the road average 0.46 goals scored and concede 0.85 per game, and fail to score in 69% of away fixtures. Quality of chances is similar — average xG is 1.07 for the hosts versus 1.11 for the visitors — but the hosts convert better at home: a conversion rate of 10% and 2.69 shots on target per match versus 7% and 2.31 for Mekelle, which explains the higher actual goal output. Additionally, Fasil have conceded only 1 goal in their last 5 matches while Mekelle have conceded 6, confirming the hosts’ defensive edge and increasing the probability of a narrow home win. On that basis I tip a home victory, with the chance of a draw limited by the visitors’ poor away efficiency.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project No BTTS as more likely — 70% vs 30%. Mekelle Kenema averages just 0.46 goals per season and 0.4 in the last 5 matches, registering 2.31 shots on target and a shot conversion of 7%, which materially limits their scoring probability. Fasil Ketema posts 1.07 goals per match with xG 1.22 and 3.29 shots on target with a 17% conversion, so the hosts are more likely to score but that alone does not guarantee BTTS. Over the season the away side conceded 28 goals and have conceded 6 in the last 5 (1.2 avg), while the hosts conceded 15 this season and only 1 in the last 5 (0.2 avg), pointing to a higher probability of a one-sided scoreline. Although the home team has a season BTTS rate of 71%, the visitors have only 15% BTTS matches and both teams have 20% BTTS in their last 5 — this asymmetry and the visitors’ poor scoring form support No BTTS.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals were calculated using xG: home xG is 1.22, Mekelle’s defensive xG is 1.13 — their average gives 1.175 (rounded to 1.18) for Fasil Ketema; Mekelle xG is 1.11 versus the home defense xG 1.32 — average 1.215 (rounded to 1.22) for Mekelle; total ≈2.39 (rounded 2.40). A Poisson model with λ≈2.39 yields probabilities: Over 1.5 ≈69% (Under 31%), Over 2.5 ≈43% (Under 57%) and Over 3.5 ≈22% (Under 78%). Historically the home side more often features in matches with at least 2 goals — at home 71% of their matches exceed 1.5 goals, and in 71% of home matches both teams scored; the home team’s goals scored average is 1.07 versus 0.46 for visitors. Additionally Fasil averages 3.29 shots on target with a 17% conversion rate versus Mekelle’s 2.31 and 7%; the visitors conceded 6 goals in their last 5 matches and have a recent defensive xG of 1.44, which increases the goal tempo for this fixture. Considering the expected total of 2.40 goals, clear home offensive advantage and Mekelle’s weaker defense in the last 5 matches, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (69%), hence the recommendation to bet on over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Half-time statistics indicate a draw: the home side are level at the break in 50% of matches, with this rate rising to 80% over the last 5 fixtures, while visitors are level at half-time in 38%; average goals at the interval are 0.57 for hosts and 0.31 for guests. In the second half the statistical advantage lies with Fasil Ketema — average points/impact after the break are 1.21 for the home team versus 0.85 for the away side, and in the last 5 matches these figures are 1.4 vs 0.6. The hosts create more chances and are more efficient: xG 1.22 compared to 1.11, shots on target 3.29 vs 2.31 and conversion 17% versus 7%, so they have better prospects of scoring the decisive goal after the break. Additionally, the hosts win second halves in 21% of cases versus 8% for their opponents, which confirms they more often erase a deficit or decide the outcome after the interval. Therefore the strongest market signal is Half-Time/Full-Time: draw at half-time and home win at full-time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Fasil Ketema | Mekelle Kenema | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 45% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.19 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Fasil Ketema is 125% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Fasil Ketema · 0.8 pts / match - Mekelle Kenema
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mekelle Kenema is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
0.7 goals / match - Fasil Ketema · 0.78 goals / match - Mekelle Kenema
Fasil Ketema is 86% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.56 goals / match - Fasil Ketema · 1.04 goals / match - Mekelle Kenema
Fasil Ketema scores in 59% of matches (16 of 27 matches), while Mekelle Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 matches).
Mekelle Kenema scores in 56% of matches (15 of 27 matches), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 63% (17 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fasil Ketema
Over / Under - Mekelle Kenema
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fasil Ketema is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.41 pts / match - Fasil Ketema · 1.22 pts / match - Mekelle Kenema
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fasil Ketema - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Mekelle Kenema - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 19%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Fasil Ketema
Mekelle Kenema
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Fasil Ketema | Liga | Mekelle Kenema | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.26 | 1.80 | • 1.81 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 26% | 42% | ▲ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 11% | 28% | ▲ 37% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 63% | 39% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 30% | 55% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 56% | 58% | ▼ 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Mekelle KenemaGoalArafat Mohammad Fahid Al Haj Ibrahim
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Fasil Ketema 0 - 1 - 0 Mekelle Kenema. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Fasil Ketema vs Mekelle Kenema?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Fasil Ketema 0:3 Mekelle Kenema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Fasil Ketema vs Mekelle Kenema?
Fasil Ketema score 0.70 goals per game on average and Mekelle Kenema 0.78. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Fasil Ketema's matches and 44% of Mekelle Kenema's.
What form are Fasil Ketema and Mekelle Kenema in?
Over the last 5 games Fasil Ketema have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Mekelle Kenema 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fasil Ketema vs Mekelle Kenema?
The statistical background for Fasil Ketema vs Mekelle Kenema — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


