Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeaguePolisportivo Comunale di TarvisioData current as of 23 July 2026

Fasil Ketema vs Sheger Ketema: match statistics

Fasil Ketema crest
Fasil Ketema
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Sheger Ketema crest
Sheger Ketema

Fasil Ketema vs Sheger Ketema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Fasil Ketema play Sheger Ketema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 29 May 2026 at 17:00. Venue: Polisportivo Comunale di Tarvisio. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Fasil Ketema: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Sheger Ketema: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Fasil Ketema scores 0.74 and concedes 0.74 goals per match. Sheger Ketema scores 0.92 and concedes 0.81. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Fasil Ketema 26%, Sheger Ketema 41%. Over 2.5: Fasil Ketema 18%, Sheger Ketema 22%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Fasil Ketema has higher xG: 1.14 vs 1.11. Fasil Ketema: 7.2 shots per match, Sheger Ketema: 7.3.

Match halves

Fasil Ketema: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.42. Sheger Ketema: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

Fasil Ketema: 76-90+ (7 goals). Sheger Ketema: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

The match looks evenly matched and a draw is the most likely outcome given similar offensive-defensive profiles: the home side average xG 1.10 at home and concede 0.81 goals per game, while the visitors generate xG 1.24 on the road and concede 1.07 goals per game. This season the hosts have recorded 11 wins and sit 6th, whereas Sheger have 8 wins and 13th place, giving the hosts a minimal table advantage. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 5 and conceded 8 (averaging 0.8 points per game), while the visitors scored 3 and conceded 4 (averaging 1.0 point), which suggests better recent points stability for the visitors. Offensively the visitors are more efficient — conversion 13% vs the hosts' 11% and a lower share of goalless away matches 20% vs 38% for the hosts — which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Considering the hosts' defensive solidity at home (clean sheets in 50% of home games) together with the visitors' higher attacking efficiency, I predict a draw; proposed probabilities: home 35%, draw 40%, away 25%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
9Shots7
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
2Shots on target3
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
0.93xG0.93
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
3Corners4
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
27Dangerous attacks34
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
16Fouls7
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
0Cards0
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
0.74Goals scored / match0.92
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
0.74Goals conceded / match0.81
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
46%Average possession46%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
2.24Shots on target / match2.22
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.24Shots per match7.27
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
2.24Shots on target2.22
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
10.2%Shot conversion12.6%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
46%Possession46%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
1.14xG for1.11
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
1.1xG against1.11
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema

Shooting quality

Fasil Ketema: BalancedSheger Ketema: Counter-attacking
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
Accuracy (shots on target)31%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sheger Ketema is 11% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Fasil Ketema · 2 pts / match - Sheger Ketema

Fasil Ketema
LWWLW
Season result split
37% W34% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-13-11
1.45 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-6
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Sheger Ketema
WDLWW
Season result split
30% W46% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-17-9
1.35 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-6-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 0.88Opponent xG: 0.98BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sheger Ketema is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

0.74 goals / match - Fasil Ketema · 0.92 goals / match - Sheger Ketema

Fasil Ketema is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.74 goals / match - Fasil Ketema · 0.81 goals / match - Sheger Ketema

Fasil Ketema scoring profile: mixed

Fasil Ketema scores in 58% of matches (22 of 38 matches), while Sheger Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 49% (18 of 37 matches).

Sheger Ketema scoring profile: mixed

Sheger Ketema scores in 68% of matches (25 of 37 matches), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 55% (21 of 38 matches).

28Goals scored (season)34
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
28Goals conceded (season)30
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
1.47Average goals in match1.73
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
4Goals scored (last 5)5
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
2Goals conceded (last 5)2
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal68%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
11%2 goals19%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
5%3 goals5%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
0%4 goals0%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema

How often they concede at least...

45%1 goal51%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
21%2 goals24%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
8%3 goals5%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
0%4 goals0%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time14%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
8%Scored in both halves3%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema

BTTS and goal count

16%Min. 3 goals and BTTS22%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
0%BTTS - last 50%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

34%Min. 1 goal before half-time43%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
8%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fasil Ketema is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.42 pts / match - Fasil Ketema · 1.19 pts / match - Sheger Ketema

Fasil Ketema - half-time state
24% leading71% draw5% trailing
Sheger Ketema - half-time state
16% leading70% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.42Points per match (1st half)1.19
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.35
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
0.13Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
0.45Average goals (1st half)0.65
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
87%Clean sheet before half-time73%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
71%No goal before half-time70%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per match (2nd half)1.38
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
0.61Goals conceded (2nd half)0.51
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
1.03Average goals (2nd half)1.08
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
63%Clean sheet after half-time65%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema
63%No goal after half-time59%
Fasil KetemaSheger Ketema

Fasil Ketema - second-half results

24% W47% R29% P
54
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sheger Ketema - second-half results

30% W49% R22% P
44
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
51
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding188%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Fasil Ketema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Sheger Ketema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Fasil Ketema
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
6
0
31-45
3
9
46-60
6
6
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Sheger Ketema
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
5
2
16-30
6
7
31-45
7
4
46-60
6
7
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
39%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Fasil Ketema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Sheger Ketema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Fasil KetemaLigaSheger Ketema
Average goals in match 1.471.78 1.73
Both teams scored 26%40% 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 18%28% 22%
Clean sheets 55%40% 49%
Goal before half-time 34%56% 43%
Goal after half-time 61%59% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Fasil Ketema 0 - 1 - 0 Sheger Ketema. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Fasil Ketema vs Sheger Ketema?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Fasil Ketema 0:1 Sheger Ketema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Fasil Ketema vs Sheger Ketema?

Fasil Ketema score 0.74 goals per game on average and Sheger Ketema 0.92. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Fasil Ketema's matches and 41% of Sheger Ketema's.

What form are Fasil Ketema and Sheger Ketema in?

Over the last 5 games Fasil Ketema have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Sheger Ketema 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fasil Ketema vs Sheger Ketema?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Fasil Ketema vs Sheger Ketema: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.