United States - MLS Next ProNorthern Kentucky University StadiumData current as of 31 August 2026

FC Cincinnati II vs Philadelphia Union II: match statistics

FC Cincinnati II vs Philadelphia Union II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FC Cincinnati II played Philadelphia Union II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Venue: Northern Kentucky University Stadium. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

FC Cincinnati II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Philadelphia Union II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

FC Cincinnati II scores 1.13 and concedes 2.25 goals per match. Philadelphia Union II scores 1.25 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FC Cincinnati II 54%, Philadelphia Union II 54%. Over 2.5: FC Cincinnati II 71%, Philadelphia Union II 54%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. FC Cincinnati II: 10.1 shots per match, Philadelphia Union II: 10.6.

Match halves

FC Cincinnati II: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.71. Philadelphia Union II: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

FC Cincinnati II: 76-90+ (7 goals). Philadelphia Union II: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.30 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-6. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Philadelphia Union II sit higher in the table and have collected 7 points from their last five matches, compared with just 3 points for FC Cincinnati II. The hosts have been extremely vulnerable defensively of late, conceding 18 goals in their last five games—3.6 per match—and losing 4 of those 5 fixtures. Cincinnati II do have a slightly better home scoring average than their opponents' away average, 1.50 versus 1.25, as well as a higher xG, 1.32 versus 1.15. However, the visitors should be able to exploit the hosts' instability, particularly given that they have recorded 9 wins this season, compared with just 5 for Cincinnati II. The match could be open, as Philadelphia Union II allow opponents an average xG of 1.98 away from home and have kept a clean sheet in only 8% of their matches, but the visitors have a slight edge.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both sides to score is strengthened by their current form: in their last 5 matches, both FC Cincinnati II and Philadelphia Union II recorded BTTS in 80% of games, compared with the league average of 62%. During this period, the hosts averaged 1.6 goals scored and conceded as many as 3.6, while the visitors scored 1.8 goals and conceded 2.6. Philadelphia Union II have kept a clean sheet in only 8% of their matches this season, while their average xG against is a high 1.98, clearly favouring a Cincinnati goal. Meanwhile, the hosts’ defence allows an average xG of 1.43, and despite having failed to score in 42% of their matches this season, the visitors are currently much more effective, scoring 9 goals in their last five outings. Cincinnati’s seasonal BTTS rate of 58% and Philadelphia’s 50% are lower than their recent form, making a scenario in which both teams score the most likely outcome. In other words, BTTS - Yes is favoured over BTTS - No: BTTS - No means that at least one team fails to score, and does not automatically imply a 0:0 draw or that neither team will score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as Philadelphia conceded at least one goal in 92% of their matches this season, while FC Cincinnati II scored in 75% of their games. Both teams are also heading into this fixture in very open form: Cincinnati conceded 18 goals in their last 5 appearances, averaging 3.6 per match, while Philadelphia allowed 13 goals, an average of 2.6. In those same five matches, the hosts averaged 1.6 goals scored and the visitors 1.8, while the total exceeded 2.5 goals in 100% and 80% of their respective games. Their attacking potential is also supported by their recent average xG figures: 1.31 for Cincinnati and 1.51 for Philadelphia, alongside high xG values conceded by their defenses, standing at 2.15 and 1.93. The 1.5 line offers a clearer safety margin than Over 2.5, although the projected 3.3 goals also point to a genuine chance of a higher-scoring game.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is a realistic scenario, as FC Cincinnati II were level at the break in 6 of their 12 matches (50%), while the hosts’ first-half average is just 1.25 goals. Philadelphia Union II have more often started poorly, trailing at half-time in 55% of their away matches, but the last five outings for both teams have been considerably more open: the hosts conceded an average of 1.8 goals before the break, compared with 2.25 for the visitors. After the interval, the advantage shifts to Philadelphia, who averaged 1.0 goals scored and 0.75 conceded in their last five matches, whereas Cincinnati recorded figures of 0.6 scored and 1.8 conceded. The visitors are also in better current points-scoring form, averaging 1.4 points over their last five matches compared with 0.6 for the hosts. Therefore, the most likely HT/FT outcome is a level score at half-time followed by Philadelphia Union II deciding the match in the second half (X/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
22Shots14
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
11Shots on target5
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
2.83xG1.64
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
6Corners4
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
95Dangerous attacks56
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
8Fouls15
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
1Cards2
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
1.13Goals scored / match1.25
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
2.25Goals conceded / match1.5
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
43%Average possession44%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
3.63Shots on target / match4
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.13Shots per match10.63
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
3.63Shots on target4
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
11.1%Shot conversion11.8%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
43%Possession44%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
1.28xG for1.28
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
1.84xG against1.69
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II

Shooting quality

FC Cincinnati II: BalancedPhiladelphia Union II: Balanced
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
Accuracy (shots on target)36%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Philadelphia Union II is 133% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - FC Cincinnati II · 1.4 pts / match - Philadelphia Union II

FC Cincinnati II
LLLLW
Season result split
21% W8% R71% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-17
0.71 pts / match · goal difference -27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-6
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 3.6xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 2.15BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Philadelphia Union II
LDWWL
Season result split
38% W17% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-4-11
1.29 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.93BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Philadelphia Union II is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

1.13 goals / match - FC Cincinnati II · 1.25 goals / match - Philadelphia Union II

Philadelphia Union II is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.25 goals / match - FC Cincinnati II · 1.5 goals / match - Philadelphia Union II

FC Cincinnati II scoring profile: very strong

FC Cincinnati II scores in 67% of matches (16 of 24 matches), while Philadelphia Union II keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 matches).

Philadelphia Union II scoring profile: very strong

Philadelphia Union II scores in 67% of matches (16 of 24 matches), while FC Cincinnati II keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 24 matches).

27Goals scored (season)30
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
54Goals conceded (season)36
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
3.38Average goals in match2.75
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
8Goals scored (last 5)9
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
18Goals conceded (last 5)13
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal67%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
29%2 goals33%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
8%3 goals13%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
4%4 goals13%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal83%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
67%2 goals33%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
38%3 goals17%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
17%4 goals13%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
FC Cincinnati II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 24 matches
54%
Philadelphia Union II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 24 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time17%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
4%BTTS in both halves4%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
8%Scored in both halves21%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
80%BTTS - last 580%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Philadelphia Union II is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.71 pts / match - FC Cincinnati II · 1.17 pts / match - Philadelphia Union II

FC Cincinnati II - half-time state
13% leading33% draw54% trailing
Philadelphia Union II - half-time state
25% leading42% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.71Points per match (1st half)1.17
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
0.42Goals scored (1st half)0.58
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
1.25Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
1.67Average goals (1st half)1.29
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
25%Clean sheet before half-time50%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
67%No goal before half-time63%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.21
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.38
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
33%Clean sheet after half-time50%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II
58%No goal after half-time54%
FC Cincinnati IIPhiladelphia Union II

FC Cincinnati II - second-half results

25% W25% R50% P
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-20
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding162%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Philadelphia Union II - second-half results

25% W46% R29% P
28
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FC Cincinnati II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match1.81.8
Average goals in match2.82.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-4-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
Philadelphia Union II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.80.6
Average goals in match2.61.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-5+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FC Cincinnati II
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
4
12
16-30
3
9
31-45
5
5
46-60
5
8
61-75
7
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Philadelphia Union II
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
8
2
16-30
4
9
31-45
4
3
46-60
7
7
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.06
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FC Cincinnati II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.56
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
158%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Philadelphia Union II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

FC Cincinnati IILigaPhiladelphia Union II
Average goals in match 3.383.30 2.75
Both teams scored 54%62% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%66% 54%
Clean sheets 13%21% 17%
Goal before half-time 83%76% 71%
Goal after half-time 88%84% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.30
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.89
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Philadelphia Union IIGoalTheo Reed
  2. FC Cincinnati IIYellow cardLeonardo Orejarena
  3. Philadelphia Union IIYellow cardGiovanny José Sequera Sequera
  4. Philadelphia Union IIYellow cardAbdoulaye Diop
  5. Philadelphia Union IISubstitutionOn: Isaiah MendozaOff: Abdoulaye Diop
  6. Philadelphia Union IISubstitutionOn: Tyler GladstoneOff: Willyam Ferreira
  7. FC Cincinnati IIGoalKristian FletcherAssist: Stefan Chirila
  8. Philadelphia Union IIGoalTheo Reed
  9. FC Cincinnati IISubstitutionOn: Yair Alexander Ramos PerezOff: Leonardo Orejarena
  10. FC Cincinnati IISubstitutionOn: Ademar ChavezOff: Kristian Fletcher
  11. Philadelphia Union IISubstitutionOn: Samuel GallegoOff: Theo Reed
  12. Philadelphia Union IIGoalJohn Ruf
  13. FC Cincinnati IIGoalAdemar ChavezAssist: Nathan Gray

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): FC Cincinnati II 0 - 0 - 6 Philadelphia Union II. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Philadelphia Union II
2 : 1
FC Cincinnati II
Philadelphia Union II
1 : 0
FC Cincinnati II
Philadelphia Union II
2 : 1
FC Cincinnati II
FC Cincinnati II
1 : 2
Philadelphia Union II
Philadelphia Union II
1 : 0
FC Cincinnati II
FC Cincinnati II
1 : 4
Philadelphia Union II

FAQ

What was the result of FC Cincinnati II vs Philadelphia Union II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished FC Cincinnati II 2:3 Philadelphia Union II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FC Cincinnati II and Philadelphia Union II?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches FC Cincinnati II won 0, Philadelphia Union II won 6 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FC Cincinnati II vs Philadelphia Union II?

FC Cincinnati II score 1.13 goals per game on average and Philadelphia Union II 1.25. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 54% of FC Cincinnati II's matches and 54% of Philadelphia Union II's.

What form are FC Cincinnati II and Philadelphia Union II in?

Over the last 5 games FC Cincinnati II have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Philadelphia Union II 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Cincinnati II vs Philadelphia Union II?

The statistical background for FC Cincinnati II vs Philadelphia Union II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.