United States - MLSTQL StadiumData current as of 30 October 2026

FC Cincinnati vs Charlotte: match statistics

FC Cincinnati crest
FC Cincinnati
3 : 3half-time 1:2
Charlotte crest
Charlotte

FC Cincinnati vs Charlotte: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FC Cincinnati played Charlotte in MLS (United States). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: TQL Stadium. Final score: 3:3.

Current form

FC Cincinnati: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Charlotte: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

FC Cincinnati scores 2.13 and concedes 2.43 goals per match. Charlotte scores 1.75 and concedes 1.38. League average: 3.21 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FC Cincinnati 74%, Charlotte 67%. Over 2.5: FC Cincinnati 70%, Charlotte 67%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

FC Cincinnati has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.39. FC Cincinnati: 13.3 shots per match, Charlotte: 11.7.

Match halves

FC Cincinnati: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 1.13. Charlotte: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.96.

Goals by minute

FC Cincinnati: 76-90+ (17 goals). Charlotte: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.21 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FC Cincinnati have a clear home advantage: they win 64% of their home matches, score an average of 2.82 goals and create chances worth 1.73 xG per game. Away from home, Charlotte score just 1.40 goals with 1.20 xG and lose 50% of such fixtures, although the hosts also concede heavily, averaging 1.91 goals per match. Cincinnati attack more frequently and accurately, averaging 15.73 shots and 6.64 shots on target, compared with their opponents’ 9.7 attempts and 3.9 on target. Overall form, however, favors Charlotte, who are unbeaten in their last five matches, scoring 11 goals and conceding 5, while Cincinnati have managed just 5 goals and conceded 9. The hosts’ superior home performance should give them a slight edge, but the visitors’ strong run increases the likelihood of a tight, high-scoring match.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

FC Cincinnati have recorded BTTS in 69% of their matches, while Charlotte have done so in 60%, compared with a league average of 63%. The hosts score an average of 2.0 goals at home, while Charlotte concede as many as 1.9 goals per away match and keep a clean sheet in only 20% of their games. Charlotte are, however, in good attacking form: they have scored 11 goals in their last five matches, averaging 2.2 per game, while Cincinnati have conceded 9 goals over the same period. In addition, both teams have created solid chances in their last five appearances, with an average xG of 1.71 for Cincinnati and 1.43 for Charlotte. The scenario in which both teams score is therefore clearly more likely than the BTTS - No outcome, meaning that at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

FC Cincinnati average 2.0 goals per match, while Charlotte concede an average of 1.9, clearly supporting at least two goals for the home side or a high total-goals tally. Charlotte have been highly effective recently, scoring 11 goals in five matches, while Cincinnati have conceded 9 goals over the same period. The 1.5 line was covered in 69% of Cincinnati’s matches and in as many as 90% of Charlotte’s games, while both teams scored Over 0.5 goals in virtually every away fixture. In addition, the average xG figures stand at 1.53 for Cincinnati and 1.20 for Charlotte, with both teams recording high percentages of matches in which both sides scored: 69% and 60%, respectively. Over 1.5 goals therefore has the strongest support from both season-long profiles and Charlotte’s current attacking form.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Charlotte win, as both teams are relatively cautious before the break: Cincinnati concede an average of 0.54 goals in that period, while Charlotte concede 0.80. However, Charlotte are clearly more effective in their current form, averaging 2.2 goals scored and just 1.0 conceded over their last five matches, whereas Cincinnati score only 1.0 and concede 1.8. The second half could be decisive, with the hosts averaging just 0.2 goals scored and as many as 1.4 conceded in their last five matches, while the visitors score 1.2 and concede only 0.6. Charlotte have lost none of their last five matches, winning three of them, while Cincinnati have suffered two defeats during that period. Cincinnati's season-long home advantage is reflected in 1.92 points per match compared with Charlotte's 1.10, but the visitors' current form and stronger second-half performances reinforce the X/2 scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

69Possession (%)31
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
29Shots8
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
10Shots on target4
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
3.39xG0.97
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
12Corners3
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
122Dangerous attacks25
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
6Fouls10
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
2Cards1
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FC CincinnatiCharlotte
2.13Goals scored / match1.75
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
2.43Goals conceded / match1.38
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
50%Average possession46%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
5.78Shots on target / match4.92
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.35Shots per match11.67
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
5.78Shots on target4.92
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
16%Shot conversion15%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
50%Possession46%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
1.53xG for1.39
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
1.81xG against1.67
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

Shooting quality

FC Cincinnati: Efficient finishingCharlotte: Counter-attacking
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
Accuracy (shots on target)43%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Charlotte is 120% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - FC Cincinnati · 2.2 pts / match - Charlotte

FC Cincinnati
DWDLL
Season result split
35% W30% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-8
1.35 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-2
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Charlotte
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
46% W25% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-6-7
1.63 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-5
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Cincinnati is 22% better for: goals scored per match.

2.13 goals / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.75 goals / match - Charlotte

Charlotte is 76% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.43 goals / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.38 goals / match - Charlotte

FC Cincinnati scoring profile: very strong

FC Cincinnati scores in 83% of matches (19 of 23 matches), while Charlotte keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 matches).

Charlotte scoring profile: very strong

Charlotte scores in 79% of matches (19 of 24 matches), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 23 matches).

49Goals scored (season)42
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
56Goals conceded (season)33
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
4.57Average goals in match3.13
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
4Goals scored (last 5)10
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
12Goals conceded (last 5)5
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal79%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
61%2 goals58%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
39%3 goals25%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
22%4 goals4%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal79%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
65%2 goals33%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
43%3 goals17%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
26%4 goals8%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
League average

Goal patterns

57%BTTS at half-time33%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
39%BTTS in both halves8%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
48%Scored in both halves38%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

BTTS and goal count

61%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
60%BTTS - last 560%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
70%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
35%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
48%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Charlotte is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.22 pts / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.54 pts / match - Charlotte

FC Cincinnati - half-time state
26% leading43% draw30% trailing
Charlotte - half-time state
38% leading42% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.22Points per match (1st half)1.54
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
1Goals scored (1st half)0.79
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
1.04Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
2.04Average goals (1st half)1.46
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
35%Clean sheet before half-time50%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
26%No goal before half-time42%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

After half-time (2nd half)

1.26Points per match (2nd half)1.5
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
1.13Goals scored (2nd half)0.96
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
1.39Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
2.52Average goals (2nd half)1.67
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
22%Clean sheet after half-time50%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte
43%No goal after half-time42%
FC CincinnatiCharlotte

FC Cincinnati - second-half results

35% W22% D43% L
28
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Charlotte - second-half results

38% W38% D25% L
37
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FC Cincinnati - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.81.6
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-1-7
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Charlotte - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FC Cincinnati
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
6
10
16-30
13
11
31-45
6
13
46-60
3
5
61-75
17
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Charlotte
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
8
5
16-30
5
5
31-45
7
5
46-60
7
4
61-75
9
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.84
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
120%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
71%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FC Cincinnati

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
177%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

Charlotte

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.65
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.57
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

FC CincinnatiLigaCharlotte
Average goals in match▲ 4.573.21• 3.13
Both teams scored▲ 74%64%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 70%62%▲ 67%
Clean sheets▼ 9%21%• 21%
Goal before half-time▲ 83%77%▼ 75%
Goal after half-time▲ 91%82%▼ 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.21
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FC CincinnatiGoalPavel BuchaAssist: Tom Barlow
  2. CharlotteGoalPep Biel Mas Jaume
  3. CharlotteSubstitutionOn: Rodolfo AlokoOff: Liel Abada
  4. FC CincinnatiGoalAhoueke DenkeyAssist: Andrei Chirila
  5. CharlotteGoalIdan GurnoAssist: Rodolfo Aloko
  6. FC CincinnatiSubstitutionOn: Bryan Josías Ramírez LeónOff: Tom Barlow
  7. CharlotteSubstitutionOn: Brandt BronicoOff: Lucas Daniel de la Torre
  8. FC CincinnatiYellow cardSamuel Gidi
  9. CharlotteSubstitutionOn: Morrison AgyemangOff: Will Cleary
  10. CharlotteSubstitutionOn: Tyger SmallsOff: Idan Gurno
  11. FC CincinnatiYellow cardKenji Mboma Dem
  12. CharlotteYellow cardRodolfo Aloko

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: FC Cincinnati 0 - 1 - 0 Charlotte. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of FC Cincinnati vs Charlotte?

The MLS match finished FC Cincinnati 3:3 Charlotte. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FC Cincinnati vs Charlotte?

FC Cincinnati score 2.13 goals per game on average and Charlotte 1.75. The MLS average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 74% of FC Cincinnati's matches and 67% of Charlotte's.

What form are FC Cincinnati and Charlotte in?

Over the last 5 games FC Cincinnati have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Charlotte 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Cincinnati vs Charlotte?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FC Cincinnati vs Charlotte: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.