United States - MLSData current as of 08 September 2026

FC Cincinnati vs Montreal Impact: match statistics

155%(1.65)
X25%(3.85)
220%(4.30)

FC Cincinnati holds a clear home advantage, supported by a 50% win rate in home matches and a positive goal difference (+1) at their stadium. Montreal Impact exhibits very poor away form with 75% losses and a disastrous goal difference (-6), conceding an average of 2.5 goals per match. The hosts boast superior xG metrics (1.2 vs 1.0) and ball possession dominance (56% vs 46%), indicating control of the game. Montreal shows slightly higher shot accuracy (11% vs 8%), but the visitors' defensive struggles (averaging 2.5 goals conceded away) should be a decisive factor. Both teams have identical form in their last 5 matches (0.6 PPG), but the home field advantage and Cincinnati's more solid defense (0.5 goals conceded in home matches) favor a home win.

FC Cincinnati vs Montreal Impact: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FC Cincinnati played Montreal Impact in MLS (United States). The match was played on 22 March 2026. Final score: 4:3.

Current form

FC Cincinnati: 1-0-3, 0.75 points/match. Montreal Impact: 1-0-3, 0.75 points/match.

Goal statistics

FC Cincinnati scores 0.75 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Montreal Impact scores 1.00 and concedes 2.50. League average: 2.99 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FC Cincinnati 25%, Montreal Impact 25%. Over 2.5: FC Cincinnati 25%, Montreal Impact 100%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

FC Cincinnati has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.00. FC Cincinnati: 13.3 shots per match, Montreal Impact: 9.5.

Match halves

FC Cincinnati: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50. Montreal Impact: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.25.

Goals by minute

FC Cincinnati: 76-90+ (2 goals). Montreal Impact: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 2.99 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FC Cincinnati holds a clear home advantage, supported by a 50% win rate in home matches and a positive goal difference (+1) at their stadium. Montreal Impact exhibits very poor away form with 75% losses and a disastrous goal difference (-6), conceding an average of 2.5 goals per match. The hosts boast superior xG metrics (1.2 vs 1.0) and ball possession dominance (56% vs 46%), indicating control of the game. Montreal shows slightly higher shot accuracy (11% vs 8%), but the visitors' defensive struggles (averaging 2.5 goals conceded away) should be a decisive factor. Both teams have identical form in their last 5 matches (0.6 PPG), but the home field advantage and Cincinnati's more solid defense (0.5 goals conceded in home matches) favor a home win.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
15Shots19
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
8Shots on target7
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
1.71xG2.07
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
2Corners2
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
27Dangerous attacks54
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
18Fouls10
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
6Cards1
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
0.75Goals scored / match1
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
2Goals conceded / match2.5
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
53%Average possession46%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
4.5Shots on target / match3.5
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.25Shots per match9.5
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
4.5Shots on target3.5
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
5.7%Shot conversion10.5%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
53%Possession46%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
1.45xG for1
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
1.46xG against1.62
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

Shooting quality

FC Cincinnati: BalancedMontreal Impact: Balanced
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
Accuracy (shots on target)34%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.170.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FC Cincinnati
WLLL
Season result split
25% W0% R75% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 25%
Montreal Impact
LLWL
Season result split
25% W0% R75% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-3
Last 5 away
1-0-3
LLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.5xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Montreal Impact is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

0.75 goals / match - FC Cincinnati · 1 goals / match - Montreal Impact

FC Cincinnati is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - FC Cincinnati · 2.5 goals / match - Montreal Impact

FC Cincinnati scoring profile: strong

FC Cincinnati scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Montreal Impact keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

Montreal Impact scoring profile: strong

Montreal Impact scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

3Goals scored (season)4
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
8Goals conceded (season)10
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
2.75Average goals in match3.5
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
3Goals scored (last 5)4
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
8Goals conceded (last 5)10
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal50%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
25%2 goals25%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
0%3 goals25%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
0%4 goals0%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
25%2 goals75%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
25%3 goals50%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
25%4 goals25%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time25%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
0%BTTS in both halves0%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
0%Scored in both halves25%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS75%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
25%BTTS - last 525%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

25%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time75%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FC Cincinnati - half-time state
0% leading75% draw25% trailing
Montreal Impact - half-time state
25% leading0% draw75% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.75Points per match (1st half)0.75
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
0.25Goals scored (1st half)0.75
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)1.25
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
1Average goals (1st half)2
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
75%Clean sheet before half-time25%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
75%No goal before half-time50%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

After half-time (2nd half)

0.75Points per match (2nd half)1
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.25
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
1.25Goals conceded (2nd half)1.25
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
1.75Average goals (2nd half)1.5
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
25%Clean sheet after half-time50%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
75%No goal after half-time75%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

FC Cincinnati - second-half results

25% W0% R75% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Montreal Impact - second-half results

25% W25% R50% P
3
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FC Cincinnati - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.750.75
Goals scored / match0.30.5
Goals conceded / match0.81.3
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal25%100%
2 goals25%50%
3 goals25%25%
Clean sheet75%25%
No goal75%75%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 75% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 0% draw - 75% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 1
Montreal Impact - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.751.00
Goals scored / match0.80.3
Goals conceded / match1.31.3
Average goals in match2.01.5
1 goal100%75%
2 goals75%50%
3 goals25%25%
Clean sheet25%50%
No goal50%75%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 25% leading - 0% draw - 75% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 25% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FC Cincinnati
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Montreal Impact
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
1
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FC Cincinnati

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.70
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
39%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
192%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

Montreal Impact

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.62
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.88
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.88
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

FC CincinnatiLigaMontreal Impact
Average goals in match 2.752.99 3.50
Both teams scored 25%49% 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 25%59% 100%
Clean sheets 25%29% 25%
Goal before half-time 25%72% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%83% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.99
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.94
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+87%
Home attack advantage
+46%
Home defence advantage
+29%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Montreal ImpactGoalPrince-Osei OwusuAssist: Iván Jaime Pajuelo
  2. Montreal ImpactYellow cardHennadiy Synchuk
  3. Montreal ImpactSubstitutionOn: Kwadwo OpokuOff: Hennadiy Synchuk
  4. Montreal ImpactSubstitutionOn: Dag­ur Dan Þór­halls­sonOff: Iván Jaime Pajuelo
  5. FC CincinnatiRed cardMiles Robinson
  6. FC CincinnatiYellow cardMatt Miazga
  7. Montreal ImpactGoalPrince-Osei Owusu
  8. FC CincinnatiYellow cardObinna Nwobodo
  9. FC CincinnatiGoalTom Barlow
  10. FC CincinnatiYellow cardTeenage Lingani Hadebe
  11. Montreal ImpactSubstitutionOn: Olger EscobarOff: Matthew Longstaff
  12. FC CincinnatiSubstitutionOn: Stiven JimenezOff: Obinna Nwobodo
  13. FC CincinnatiGoalAhoueke Denkey
  14. FC CincinnatiYellow cardAhoueke Denkey

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Filip DujicMatches officiated: 8
4.88Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 250%Home wins38%Draws13%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of FC Cincinnati vs Montreal Impact?

The MLS match finished FC Cincinnati 4:3 Montreal Impact. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FC Cincinnati vs Montreal Impact?

FC Cincinnati score 0.75 goals per game on average and Montreal Impact 1.00. The MLS average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 25% of FC Cincinnati's matches and 25% of Montreal Impact's.

What form are FC Cincinnati and Montreal Impact in?

Over the last 5 games FC Cincinnati have a 1-0-3 record (0.75 points per game) and Montreal Impact 1-0-3 (0.75 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Cincinnati vs Montreal Impact?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.