United States - MLSTQL StadiumData current as of 02 November 2026

FC Cincinnati vs Philadelphia Union: match statistics

FC Cincinnati vs Philadelphia Union: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FC Cincinnati played Philadelphia Union in MLS (United States). The match was played on 31 October 2026. Venue: TQL Stadium. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

FC Cincinnati: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Philadelphia Union: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

FC Cincinnati scores 2.06 and concedes 2.28 goals per match. Philadelphia Union scores 1.94 and concedes 1.56. League average: 3.25 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FC Cincinnati 75%, Philadelphia Union 69%. Over 2.5: FC Cincinnati 72%, Philadelphia Union 69%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.

xG, shots and style

Philadelphia Union has higher xG: 1.85 vs 1.68. FC Cincinnati: 14.8 shots per match, Philadelphia Union: 16.6.

Match halves

FC Cincinnati: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 1.22. Philadelphia Union: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 1.34.

Goals by minute

FC Cincinnati: 76-90+ (23 goals). Philadelphia Union: 61-75 (18 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.25 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FC Cincinnati have a slight home advantage: they have won 53% of their home matches, while Philadelphia Union have lost 47% of their away games. The hosts average 2.53 goals at home with an xG of 1.94, compared with the visitors’ 2.27 goals and xG of 1.73 on the road, pointing to slightly better chance quality from Cincinnati. However, the last five matches favor Philadelphia, who scored 12 goals and won 3 times, while Cincinnati scored 9 goals and also recorded 3 wins. Both defenses give opponents opportunities: Cincinnati concede an average of 2.00 goals at home, and Philadelphia 2.13 away. I’m therefore backing the hosts, although the visitors’ scoring form and recent results mean the advantage is not a significant one.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for both teams to score is supported by their season-long rates of matches featuring goals from both sides: 63% for FC Cincinnati and 80% for Philadelphia Union. The visitors average 2.27 goals per match, while the hosts average 1.75; their average xG figures are 1.73 and 2.02, respectively, indicating that both teams consistently create chances. In their last 5 matches, Philadelphia averaged 2.4 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, while Cincinnati scored 1.8 and conceded 1.4 goals per game. BTTS landed in all 5 of the visitors’ last matches and in 3 of the hosts’ last 5. Although Cincinnati keep a clean sheet in 31% of their matches, both teams’ attacking output and Philadelphia’s clean-sheet rate of just 7% point towards BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

At least 2 goals were scored in 75% of Cincinnati’s matches and in 93% of Philadelphia’s, making Over 1.5 the strongest pick. The hosts average 1.75 goals and create chances worth 2.02 xG, while the visitors concede an average of 2.13 goals per match. Philadelphia average 2.27 goals scored, although Cincinnati’s defense limits opponents to 0.98 xG per match. Over their last 5 matches, the teams scored 1.8 and 2.4 goals per game respectively, further supporting a scenario with at least 2 goals. Over 2.5 also has a strong case, but it has landed in 63% of the hosts’ matches and 80% of the visitors’, so the 1.5 line offers a clearer signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal in favour of Cincinnati leading at the break is that Philadelphia were trailing at half-time in 60% of their matches and conceded an average of 1.27 goals before the break, compared with just 0.50 for the hosts. Cincinnati also have the more favourable chance-quality profile, averaging 2.02 xG against their opponents’ 1.73, while allowing 0.98 xG compared with 1.27. The hosts’ lower overall goals-against average—1.13 versus 2.13 for the visitors—and Cincinnati winning the second half in 3 of their last 5 matches also support them holding on to their lead. Philadelphia remain dangerous, averaging 2.27 goals per match and having led at the break in 3 of their last 5 outings. Therefore, 1/1 is the strongest HT/FT scenario, but it is not the dominant forecast.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
7Shots15
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
2Shots on target6
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
0.76xG1.87
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
3Corners12
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
23Dangerous attacks69
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
11Fouls4
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
0Cards0
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
2.06Goals scored / match1.94
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
2.28Goals conceded / match1.56
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
51%Average possession47%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
5.81Shots on target / match5.31
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.75Shots per match16.59
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
5.81Shots on target5.31
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
14%Shot conversion11.7%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
51%Possession47%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
1.68xG for1.85
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
1.65xG against1.11
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union

Shooting quality

FC Cincinnati: AttackingPhiladelphia Union: Attacking
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
Accuracy (shots on target)39%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Philadelphia Union is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.6 pts / match - Philadelphia Union

FC Cincinnati
LLWWD
Season result split
34% W31% D34% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-11
1.34 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.75Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Philadelphia Union
WWDLD
Season result split
41% W25% D34% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-8-11
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-3-7
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.90Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Cincinnati is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

2.06 goals / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.94 goals / match - Philadelphia Union

Philadelphia Union is 46% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.28 goals / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.56 goals / match - Philadelphia Union

FC Cincinnati scoring profile: very strong

FC Cincinnati scores in 84% of matches (27 of 32 matches), while Philadelphia Union keeps a clean sheet in 22% (7 of 32 matches).

Philadelphia Union scoring profile: very strong

Philadelphia Union scores in 81% of matches (26 of 32 matches), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 32 matches).

66Goals scored (season)62
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
73Goals conceded (season)50
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
4.34Average goals in match3.5
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
8Goals scored (last 5)8
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union

How often they score at least...

84%1 goal81%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
66%2 goals53%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
34%3 goals38%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
16%4 goals16%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal78%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
66%2 goals50%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
41%3 goals16%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
19%4 goals6%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

69%
Philadelphia Union - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.22 of 32 matches
64%
League average

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time16%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
34%BTTS in both halves0%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
47%Scored in both halves28%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union

BTTS and goal count

66%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
60%BTTS - last 580%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time84%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
59%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
31%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
66%Min. 2 goals after half-time66%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Philadelphia Union is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.06 pts / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.13 pts / match - Philadelphia Union

FC Cincinnati - half-time state
22% leading41% draw38% trailing
Philadelphia Union - half-time state
28% leading28% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.06Points per match (1st half)1.13
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
0.84Goals scored (1st half)0.59
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.84
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
1.84Average goals (1st half)1.44
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
34%Clean sheet before half-time44%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
34%No goal before half-time56%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union

After half-time (2nd half)

1.44Points per match (2nd half)1.59
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
1.22Goals scored (2nd half)1.34
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
1.28Goals conceded (2nd half)0.72
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
2.5Average goals (2nd half)2.06
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
22%Clean sheet after half-time53%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union
34%No goal after half-time34%
FC CincinnatiPhiladelphia Union

FC Cincinnati - second-half results

41% W22% D38% L
34
Half-time points
27
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding155%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Philadelphia Union - second-half results

41% W38% D22% L
36
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
51
Second-half points
+20
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FC Cincinnati - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Philadelphia Union - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FC Cincinnati
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
6
14
16-30
14
14
31-45
10
17
46-60
6
9
61-75
23
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (23 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Philadelphia Union
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
5
12
16-30
9
9
31-45
13
5
46-60
18
7
61-75
12
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (18 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.92
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
121%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
72%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
68%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FC Cincinnati

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.63
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
162%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

Philadelphia Union

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.74
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
138%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

FC CincinnatiLigaPhiladelphia Union
Average goals in match▲ 4.343.25▲ 3.50
Both teams scored▲ 75%64%▲ 69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 72%64%▲ 69%
Clean sheets▼ 9%21%• 22%
Goal before half-time▲ 81%78%▲ 84%
Goal after half-time▲ 94%83%▼ 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.25
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / match
1.41
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FC CincinnatiSubstitutionOn: Evander da Silva FerreiraOff: Samuel Gidi
  2. Philadelphia UnionSubstitutionOn: Agustin AnelloOff: Indiana Vassilev
  3. FC CincinnatiSubstitutionOn: Alvas Elvis PowellOff: Teenage Lingani Hadebe
  4. FC CincinnatiSubstitutionOn: Brian AnungaOff: Ahoueke Denkey
  5. Philadelphia UnionSubstitutionOn: Malik JakupovicOff: Jovan Lukić

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: FC Cincinnati 0 - 0 - 1 Philadelphia Union. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of FC Cincinnati vs Philadelphia Union?

The MLS match finished FC Cincinnati 1:0 Philadelphia Union. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FC Cincinnati vs Philadelphia Union?

FC Cincinnati score 2.06 goals per game on average and Philadelphia Union 1.94. The MLS average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 75% of FC Cincinnati's matches and 69% of Philadelphia Union's.

What form are FC Cincinnati and Philadelphia Union in?

Over the last 5 games FC Cincinnati have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Philadelphia Union 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Cincinnati vs Philadelphia Union?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FC Cincinnati vs Philadelphia Union: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.