FC Penafiel vs Porto II: match statistics
FC Penafiel vs Porto II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FC Penafiel played Porto II in LigaPro (Portugal). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
FC Penafiel: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Porto II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
FC Penafiel scores 1.00 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. Porto II scores 1.23 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.44 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FC Penafiel 43%, Porto II 47%. Over 2.5: FC Penafiel 33%, Porto II 53%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
FC Penafiel has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.25. FC Penafiel: 11.1 shots per match, Porto II: 10.5.
Match halves
FC Penafiel: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.67. Porto II: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
FC Penafiel: 76-90+ (11 goals). Porto II: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
LigaPro: 2.44 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FC Penafiel is 14th, Porto II 6th; this season Penafiel has 9 wins, 8 draws and 13 losses with 30 goals scored and 34 conceded, while Porto II has 12 wins, 6 draws and 12 losses with 37 scored and 39 conceded. At home Penafiel averages 1.0 goal and xG 1.4 with 40% clean sheets, whereas Porto II away records 1.33 goals, xG 1.31 and only 13% clean sheets. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 8 and conceded 10 (1.6 scored and 2.0 conceded on average), earning 1.2 points per game, while the visitors scored 5 and conceded 6 (1.0 and 1.2) with an average of 1.0 point. Porto II have a higher shot conversion rate 12% vs 9% for Penafiel and more goals on the season (37 vs 30), which increases their offensive potential, but weaker away defence (1.67 goals conceded per game) and low clean sheet percentage (13%) favour the hosts, therefore I predict a Penafiel win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The xG-based model projects expected goals of ~1.44 for FC Penafiel (attacking xG 1.19 vs Porto II conceded xG 1.69) and ~1.37 for Porto II (attacking xG 1.31 vs Penafiel conceded xG 1.42). Under a Poisson distribution the probability Penafiel scores at least once is ~76% (1 - e^{-1.44}) and Porto II ~75% (1 - e^{-1.37}), yielding a theoretical BTTS - Yes probability of ~57% (0.76×0.75≈0.57). Seasonal indicators are mixed: Penafiel has a season BTTS of 33% and a high clean sheet expected rate of 53%, whereas Porto II has a season BTTS of 60% and concedes on average 1.67 goals per match, which increases the visitors’ scoring probability. In the last 5 matches Penafiel shows 60% BTTS with a goal balance of 8:10 (1.6 scored, 2.0 conceded), and Porto II has 40% BTTS with a 5:6 goal balance, so recent form moderately supports the both-teams-to-score scenario. Considering xG signals and last-5 form outweighing the home team’s historical clean sheet rate, I recommend BTTS - Yes as the more likely outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The prediction is based on xG and seasonal percentages: home xG is 1.19, xG against Porto II is 1.69, yielding an expected 1.44 goals for Penafiel; Porto II xG is 1.31 with xG against the hosts 1.42, yielding 1.37 goals for the visitors, total 2.81. Seasonal percentages show the hosts have 53% of matches with over 1.5 goals, and Porto II 87% — approximately 70% combined for the 1.5 line; for 2.5 the figures are 47% and 60% respectively (avg ~54%), and for 3.5 only 13% and 33% (avg ~23%). In the last 5 matches Penafiel scored on average 1.6 and conceded 2.0 goals (8 scored/10 conceded), while Porto II in their last 5 had 1.0 scored and 1.2 conceded (5:6), which increases the probability of at least two goals in the match. The league averages 2.46 goals per game, and our expectation of 2.81 is clearly above that average, strengthening the over signal. The strongest pick from available data is Over 1.5, as it has the highest consolidated percentage support (~70%) and relatively low risk compared to the narrower edge for Over 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a half-time draw with the home team winning after full-time (X/1) — I assign it a 28% probability because FC Penafiel were level at the break in 47% of their matches this season while winning 53% of matches overall versus Porto II’s 27%. The hosts have 67% clean sheets at half-time and average 0.6 goals before the break, whereas Porto II concede on average 0.87 goals by half-time and have conceded as many as 10 goals in minutes 31–45, indicating vulnerability from the visitors late in the first half. Additionally, Penafiel scored 6 goals in minutes 46–60 and have 80% clean sheets in the second half, which increases the likelihood that the hosts will break the draw after the interval and hold the lead. xG metrics show 1.19 xG for the hosts versus 1.31 xG for Porto II, with xG against of 1.42 for the hosts and 1.69 for the visitors, meaning Porto II allow higher-quality opponent chances. In this context X/1 (28%) appears the strongest signal; alternatives are 1/1 (23%) and draw/draw X/X (12%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FC Penafiel | Porto II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FC Penafiel is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - FC Penafiel · 1 pts / match - Porto II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Porto II is 23% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - FC Penafiel · 1.23 goals / match - Porto II
FC Penafiel is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.13 goals / match - FC Penafiel · 1.3 goals / match - Porto II
FC Penafiel scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Porto II keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).
Porto II scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while FC Penafiel keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FC Penafiel
Over / Under - Porto II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Porto II is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.87 pts / match - FC Penafiel · 1.23 pts / match - Porto II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FC Penafiel - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Porto II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FC Penafiel
Porto II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LigaPro).
Teams vs league
| FC Penafiel | Liga | Porto II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.13 | 2.44 | • 2.53 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 46% | • 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 44% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 37% | 32% | • 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 64% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 77% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: FC Penafiel 0 - 0 - 1 Porto II. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FC Penafiel vs Porto II?
The LigaPro match finished FC Penafiel 3:0 Porto II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FC Penafiel vs Porto II?
FC Penafiel score 1.00 goals per game on average and Porto II 1.23. The LigaPro average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 43% of FC Penafiel's matches and 47% of Porto II's.
What form are FC Penafiel and Porto II in?
Over the last 5 games FC Penafiel have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Porto II 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Penafiel vs Porto II?
The statistical background for FC Penafiel vs Porto II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


