FC Vizela vs Sporting CP II: match statistics
FC Vizela vs Sporting CP II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FC Vizela played Sporting CP II in LigaPro (Portugal). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
FC Vizela: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Sporting CP II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
FC Vizela scores 1.23 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. Sporting CP II scores 1.37 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.45 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FC Vizela 47%, Sporting CP II 40%. Over 2.5: FC Vizela 43%, Sporting CP II 50%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
FC Vizela has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.39. FC Vizela: 12.4 shots per match, Sporting CP II: 11.6.
Match halves
FC Vizela: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.87. Sporting CP II: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.70.
Goals by minute
FC Vizela: 46-60 (11 goals). Sporting CP II: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
LigaPro: 2.45 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FC Vizela holds a clear edge in chance creation at home: home xG is 1.63 versus Sporting II’s 1.33 xG on the road, and the hosts average 13.47 shots and 5.27 shots on target per match compared to 11.27 shots and 3.6 on target for the visitors. Vizela scores 1.53 goals per home game with an 11% conversion rate, while Sporting II averages 1.20 goals away with the same 11% efficiency. The visitors, however, concede only 0.93 goals on the road versus Vizela’s 1.33 conceded at home, but their away xG against is 1.42, suggesting Sporting defends better than the quality of chances against them would indicate (goalkeeper role or higher defensive effectiveness). In the short term Vizela averages 1.2 points over the last 5 matches versus Sporting’s 0.6, scoring 6 and conceding 8 in that span, while Sporting scored 4 and conceded 7, giving the hosts a slight offensive advantage. Considering the greater volume and quality of shots (5.27 vs 3.6 shots on target) and higher xG (1.63 vs 1.33), I favor a Vizela win, although Sporting’s solid defensive numbers away limit their deficit.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project BTTS - Yes as slightly more likely (55% vs 45%) because FC Vizela averages 1.53 goals per match and Sporting CP II 1.20, giving both sides genuine scoring capability. Seasonal goals conceded averages are 1.13 (Vizela) and 0.93 (Sporting II), and in the last 5 matches both teams have been leaking more — 1.6 and 1.4 respectively — which increases the probability of both teams scoring. Offensive xG stands at 1.46 for Vizela and 1.33 for Sporting II; combined xG of 2.79 is clearly above the league average of 2.46, and the hosts register 5.0 shots on target versus 3.6 for the visitors, which supports goal outcomes. The season BTTS rate is 40% for both teams (league 46%), which slightly weakens the signal, but Sporting II have 60% BTTS in their last 5 matches (vs 40% for Vizela), so in the short term the away side is more involved in Goal/Goal games. Weighing seasonal and recent data (goal averages, xG 2.79 vs 2.46 and recent conceded averages 1.6/1.4), the Both Teams To Score scenario appears marginally stronger.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate total goals at around 2.80 (expected goals for the home side 1.44 — calculated from home xG 1.46 and opponents’ average defensive xG 1.42; expected goals for the away side 1.36 = xG 1.33 vs home defensive xG 1.39). Season averages are 1.53 goals for Vizela and 1.20 for Sporting II, totaling 2.73, which confirms a tendency toward Over 2.5 goals. Both teams have 60% of season matches with over 1.5 goals, and Vizela records 53% of matches Over 2.5, therefore the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (estimated probability 82%). Additionally, the home side averages 5.0 shots on target vs. 3.6 for the visitors and has a higher shot conversion rate (13% vs. 11%), which increases the likelihood of further goals; hence I recommend an Over 1.5 bet.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The hosts show a clear first-half advantage: they led at the break in 7 of 15 matches (47%), scoring an average of 0.80 goals by half-time versus 0.53 for the visitors, while the visitors concede an average of 0.67 goals before the break. Vizela have scored 8 goals in minutes 31–45, whereas Sporting CP II have conceded 4 goals in the same interval, which increases the likelihood of the hosts taking a lead at the break. Over the full match the hosts average 1.53 goals with an xG of 1.46, while the visitors average 0.93 conceded with an xG of 1.33; the hosts also register 5.0 on-target shots on average versus 3.6 for the visitors, confirming Vizela’s offensive superiority. The visitors, however, rarely concede after the break—only 0.27 goals on average in the second half—so a significant turnaround is unlikely; therefore the most probable scenario is Vizela leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FC Vizela | Sporting CP II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FC Vizela is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - FC Vizela · 0.6 pts / match - Sporting CP II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sporting CP II is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
1.23 goals / match - FC Vizela · 1.37 goals / match - Sporting CP II
Sporting CP II is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.2 goals / match - FC Vizela · 1.03 goals / match - Sporting CP II
FC Vizela scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Sporting CP II keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 matches).
Sporting CP II scores in 67% of matches (20 of 30 matches), while FC Vizela keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FC Vizela
Over / Under - Sporting CP II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sporting CP II is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.23 pts / match - FC Vizela · 1.3 pts / match - Sporting CP II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FC Vizela - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Sporting CP II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FC Vizela
Sporting CP II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LigaPro).
Teams vs league
| FC Vizela | Liga | Sporting CP II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.43 | 2.45 | • 2.40 |
| Both teams scored | • 47% | 46% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 43% | 44% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 27% | 32% | ▼ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 64% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 77% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: FC Vizela 1 - 0 - 0 Sporting CP II. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FC Vizela vs Sporting CP II?
The LigaPro match finished FC Vizela 1:0 Sporting CP II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FC Vizela vs Sporting CP II?
FC Vizela score 1.23 goals per game on average and Sporting CP II 1.37. The LigaPro average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 47% of FC Vizela's matches and 40% of Sporting CP II's.
What form are FC Vizela and Sporting CP II in?
Over the last 5 games FC Vizela have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Sporting CP II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Vizela vs Sporting CP II?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FC Vizela vs Sporting CP II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


