Fernando de la Mora vs Benjamin Aceval: match statistics
Fernando de la Mora vs Benjamin Aceval: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Fernando de la Mora played Benjamin Aceval in Division Intermedia (Paraguay). The match was played on 14 August 2026. Venue: Estadio Emilio Ghezzi. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Fernando de la Mora: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Benjamin Aceval: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Fernando de la Mora scores 1.06 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Benjamin Aceval scores 1.61 and concedes 0.94. League average: 2.54 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Fernando de la Mora 56%, Benjamin Aceval 56%. Over 2.5: Fernando de la Mora 44%, Benjamin Aceval 39%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 42%.
xG, shots and style
Fernando de la Mora has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.45. Fernando de la Mora: 12.1 shots per match, Benjamin Aceval: 10.7.
Match halves
Fernando de la Mora: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.72. Benjamin Aceval: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Fernando de la Mora: 76-90+ (7 goals). Benjamin Aceval: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Division Intermedia: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 42%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Benjamin Aceval sit 2nd, while Fernando de la Mora are only 12th, and the visitors’ overall season record stands at 10 wins and just 3 defeats, compared with 5 wins and 8 losses for the hosts. Away from home, Benjamin Aceval average 1.89 goals per match, more than twice Fernando de la Mora’s home average (0.89), and they also fail to score far less frequently: in 11% of matches compared with 33%. The visitors are clearly more clinical, converting 17% of their shots into goals versus 7% for the hosts, while also averaging 4.33 shots on target per match compared with 3.33. Recent form over the last five matchdays also slightly favors Benjamin Aceval, who have averaged 1.6 points per match, compared with 1.2 for their opponents. A draw remains a realistic outcome, as Fernando de la Mora have drawn 44% of their home matches; however, the visitors’ attacking edge and superior season record point to an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is moderately positive: in their last five matches, both teams recorded this scenario 60% of the time, compared with the league average of 56%. Benjamin Aceval average 1.89 goals per match, while Fernando de la Mora have conceded 1.40 goals per game over their last five appearances. The hosts also have solid grounds to score, with an average xG of 1.47, while their opponents allow 1.52 xG to opposing teams. However, the pick is not decisive, as Fernando de la Mora keep a clean sheet in 44% of matches and their seasonal BTTS rate stands at just 44%. Despite this defensive counterweight, the visitors’ attacking consistency and the current form of both teams point slightly more strongly towards goals at both ends.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile points to a moderate number of goals: the home side averages 1.33 goals scored, while the visitors average 1.89, but Fernando de la Mora concedes just 0.67 goals per match. In their last five appearances, both teams scored 1.2 goals per game, with average xG figures of 1.23 and 1.32 respectively, supporting a forecast of around 2.40 total goals. The 3.5 line was not exceeded in 89% of the home side’s matches and 78% of the visitors’ games, while Over 3.5 goals landed in only 11% and 22% of those matches respectively. The hosts kept a clean sheet in 44% of their matches, while their opponents failed to score in 22%, further reducing the risk of an open, four-goal scenario. Under 3.5 is therefore the strongest pick, as the season data and current form more clearly support a range of 0 to 3 goals than a high-scoring game.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as Fernando de la Mora were level at the break in 63% of their matches, while the hosts’ first-half average is just 0.88 goals. Benjamin Aceval often start slowly: they were trailing at half-time in 56% of matches, but after the interval they won as many as 89% of second halves and averaged 1.33 goals in them. The visitors are also more effective over the season as a whole, scoring an average of 1.89 goals compared with the hosts’ 1.33, with a shot conversion rate of 17% versus 11%. Their superior recent form is further supported by the last five matches, yielding 1.6 points per game compared with Fernando de la Mora’s 1.2. However, the hosts’ solid defence, which has kept a clean sheet in 44% of matches, reduces the likelihood of the visitors taking an early lead. Therefore, the X/2 scenario has an edge over Benjamin Aceval leading already at half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Fernando de la Mora | Benjamin Aceval | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Benjamin Aceval is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Fernando de la Mora · 1.6 pts / match - Benjamin Aceval
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Benjamin Aceval is 52% better for: goals scored per match.
1.06 goals / match - Fernando de la Mora · 1.61 goals / match - Benjamin Aceval
Benjamin Aceval is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Fernando de la Mora · 0.94 goals / match - Benjamin Aceval
Fernando de la Mora scores in 67% of matches (12 of 18 matches), while Benjamin Aceval keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 matches).
Benjamin Aceval scores in 83% of matches (15 of 18 matches), while Fernando de la Mora keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fernando de la Mora
Over / Under - Benjamin Aceval
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Benjamin Aceval is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Fernando de la Mora · 1.11 pts / match - Benjamin Aceval
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fernando de la Mora - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Benjamin Aceval - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Fernando de la Mora
Benjamin Aceval
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Division Intermedia).
Teams vs league
| Fernando de la Mora | Liga | Benjamin Aceval | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.56 | 2.54 | • 2.56 |
| Both teams scored | • 56% | 55% | • 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 44% | 42% | ▼ 39% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 26% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | • 67% | 66% | ▲ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 76% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Fernando de la Mora 1 - 0 - 0 Benjamin Aceval. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Fernando de la Mora vs Benjamin Aceval?
The Division Intermedia match finished Fernando de la Mora 2:1 Benjamin Aceval. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Fernando de la Mora vs Benjamin Aceval?
Fernando de la Mora score 1.06 goals per game on average and Benjamin Aceval 1.61. The Division Intermedia average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Fernando de la Mora's matches and 56% of Benjamin Aceval's.
What form are Fernando de la Mora and Benjamin Aceval in?
Over the last 5 games Fernando de la Mora have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Benjamin Aceval 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fernando de la Mora vs Benjamin Aceval?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Fernando de la Mora vs Benjamin Aceval: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


