Paraguay - Division IntermediaEstadio Emilio GhezziData current as of 14 October 2026

Fernando de la Mora vs Benjamin Aceval: match statistics

Fernando de la Mora vs Benjamin Aceval: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Fernando de la Mora played Benjamin Aceval in Division Intermedia (Paraguay). The match was played on 14 August 2026. Venue: Estadio Emilio Ghezzi. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Fernando de la Mora: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Benjamin Aceval: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Fernando de la Mora scores 1.06 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Benjamin Aceval scores 1.61 and concedes 0.94. League average: 2.54 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Fernando de la Mora 56%, Benjamin Aceval 56%. Over 2.5: Fernando de la Mora 44%, Benjamin Aceval 39%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Fernando de la Mora has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.45. Fernando de la Mora: 12.1 shots per match, Benjamin Aceval: 10.7.

Match halves

Fernando de la Mora: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.72. Benjamin Aceval: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Fernando de la Mora: 76-90+ (7 goals). Benjamin Aceval: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Division Intermedia: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Benjamin Aceval sit 2nd, while Fernando de la Mora are only 12th, and the visitors’ overall season record stands at 10 wins and just 3 defeats, compared with 5 wins and 8 losses for the hosts. Away from home, Benjamin Aceval average 1.89 goals per match, more than twice Fernando de la Mora’s home average (0.89), and they also fail to score far less frequently: in 11% of matches compared with 33%. The visitors are clearly more clinical, converting 17% of their shots into goals versus 7% for the hosts, while also averaging 4.33 shots on target per match compared with 3.33. Recent form over the last five matchdays also slightly favors Benjamin Aceval, who have averaged 1.6 points per match, compared with 1.2 for their opponents. A draw remains a realistic outcome, as Fernando de la Mora have drawn 44% of their home matches; however, the visitors’ attacking edge and superior season record point to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS signal is moderately positive: in their last five matches, both teams recorded this scenario 60% of the time, compared with the league average of 56%. Benjamin Aceval average 1.89 goals per match, while Fernando de la Mora have conceded 1.40 goals per game over their last five appearances. The hosts also have solid grounds to score, with an average xG of 1.47, while their opponents allow 1.52 xG to opposing teams. However, the pick is not decisive, as Fernando de la Mora keep a clean sheet in 44% of matches and their seasonal BTTS rate stands at just 44%. Despite this defensive counterweight, the visitors’ attacking consistency and the current form of both teams point slightly more strongly towards goals at both ends.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile points to a moderate number of goals: the home side averages 1.33 goals scored, while the visitors average 1.89, but Fernando de la Mora concedes just 0.67 goals per match. In their last five appearances, both teams scored 1.2 goals per game, with average xG figures of 1.23 and 1.32 respectively, supporting a forecast of around 2.40 total goals. The 3.5 line was not exceeded in 89% of the home side’s matches and 78% of the visitors’ games, while Over 3.5 goals landed in only 11% and 22% of those matches respectively. The hosts kept a clean sheet in 44% of their matches, while their opponents failed to score in 22%, further reducing the risk of an open, four-goal scenario. Under 3.5 is therefore the strongest pick, as the season data and current form more clearly support a range of 0 to 3 goals than a high-scoring game.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as Fernando de la Mora were level at the break in 63% of their matches, while the hosts’ first-half average is just 0.88 goals. Benjamin Aceval often start slowly: they were trailing at half-time in 56% of matches, but after the interval they won as many as 89% of second halves and averaged 1.33 goals in them. The visitors are also more effective over the season as a whole, scoring an average of 1.89 goals compared with the hosts’ 1.33, with a shot conversion rate of 17% versus 11%. Their superior recent form is further supported by the last five matches, yielding 1.6 points per game compared with Fernando de la Mora’s 1.2. However, the hosts’ solid defence, which has kept a clean sheet in 44% of matches, reduces the likelihood of the visitors taking an early lead. Therefore, the X/2 scenario has an edge over Benjamin Aceval leading already at half-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
14Shots11
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
5Shots on target3
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
1.81xG1.53
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
2Corners1
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
80Dangerous attacks87
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
9Fouls13
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
0Cards0
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
1.06Goals scored / match1.61
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
1.5Goals conceded / match0.94
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
50%Average possession48%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
3.44Shots on target / match3.83
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.06Shots per match10.67
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
3.44Shots on target3.83
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
8.8%Shot conversion15.1%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
50%Possession48%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
1.51xG for1.45
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
1.4xG against1.52
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval

Shooting quality

Fernando de la Mora: BalancedBenjamin Aceval: Efficient finishing
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
Accuracy (shots on target)29%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Benjamin Aceval is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Fernando de la Mora · 1.6 pts / match - Benjamin Aceval

Fernando de la Mora
DWDDL
Season result split
28% W28% D44% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-8
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-4-4
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
LLDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Benjamin Aceval
DWDLW
Season result split
56% W28% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-5-3
1.94 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Benjamin Aceval is 52% better for: goals scored per match.

1.06 goals / match - Fernando de la Mora · 1.61 goals / match - Benjamin Aceval

Benjamin Aceval is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Fernando de la Mora · 0.94 goals / match - Benjamin Aceval

Fernando de la Mora scoring profile: strong

Fernando de la Mora scores in 67% of matches (12 of 18 matches), while Benjamin Aceval keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 matches).

Benjamin Aceval scoring profile: very strong

Benjamin Aceval scores in 83% of matches (15 of 18 matches), while Fernando de la Mora keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 matches).

19Goals scored (season)29
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
27Goals conceded (season)17
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
2.56Average goals in match2.56
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
6Goals scored (last 5)6
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal83%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
28%2 goals56%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
11%3 goals17%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
0%4 goals6%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal67%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
56%2 goals17%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
11%3 goals6%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
0%4 goals6%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
Fernando de la Mora - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 18 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
6%BTTS in both halves6%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
17%Scored in both halves33%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
60%BTTS - last 560%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time28%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time28%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Benjamin Aceval is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Fernando de la Mora · 1.11 pts / match - Benjamin Aceval

Fernando de la Mora - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing
Benjamin Aceval - half-time state
22% leading44% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.11
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
0.83Average goals (1st half)1.06
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
67%No goal before half-time61%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per match (2nd half)2.22
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
0.72Goals scored (2nd half)1
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.39
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
1.72Average goals (2nd half)1.39
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
39%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval
50%No goal after half-time28%
Fernando de la MoraBenjamin Aceval

Fernando de la Mora - second-half results

28% W33% D39% L
18
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Benjamin Aceval - second-half results

67% W22% D11% L
20
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding255%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fernando de la Mora - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Benjamin Aceval - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Fernando de la Mora
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
3
1
16-30
1
6
31-45
4
4
46-60
2
3
61-75
7
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Benjamin Aceval
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
3
5
16-30
5
3
31-45
8
2
46-60
6
3
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.56
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-61%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Fernando de la Mora

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

Benjamin Aceval

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.74
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.58
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
131%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Division Intermedia).

Teams vs league

Fernando de la MoraLigaBenjamin Aceval
Average goals in match• 2.562.54• 2.56
Both teams scored• 56%55%• 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 44%42%▼ 39%
Clean sheets▼ 17%26%▲ 33%
Goal before half-time• 67%66%▲ 72%
Goal after half-time▲ 89%76%▲ 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.54
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / match
1.23
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Fernando de la MoraGoalIsaías Enmanuel Gavilán Romero

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Fernando de la Mora 1 - 0 - 0 Benjamin Aceval. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Fernando de la Mora vs Benjamin Aceval?

The Division Intermedia match finished Fernando de la Mora 2:1 Benjamin Aceval. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Fernando de la Mora vs Benjamin Aceval?

Fernando de la Mora score 1.06 goals per game on average and Benjamin Aceval 1.61. The Division Intermedia average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Fernando de la Mora's matches and 56% of Benjamin Aceval's.

What form are Fernando de la Mora and Benjamin Aceval in?

Over the last 5 games Fernando de la Mora have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Benjamin Aceval 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fernando de la Mora vs Benjamin Aceval?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Fernando de la Mora vs Benjamin Aceval: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.