FH vs ÍBV: match statistics
FH vs ÍBV: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FH played ÍBV in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 28 June 2026. Venue: Kaplakrikavöllur. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
FH: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. ÍBV: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
FH scores 1.36 and concedes 2.55 goals per match. ÍBV scores 1.82 and concedes 2.27. League average: 4.06 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FH 73%, ÍBV 82%. Over 2.5: FH 73%, ÍBV 73%. League level: BTTS 72%, Over 2.5 72%.
xG, shots and style
FH has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.33. FH: 12.7 shots per match, ÍBV: 11.4.
Match halves
FH: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.45. ÍBV: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.91.
Goals by minute
FH: 31-45+ (5 goals). ÍBV: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Úrvalsdeild: 4.06 goals per match, BTTS 72%, Over 2.5 72%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-1. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
ÍBV is the favorite in this matchup based on form and efficiency — the visitors have scored 14 goals in their last 5 matches versus 4 for the hosts and average 2 points per game in that period, while FH averages 0.8 points per game. Offensive efficiency favors ÍBV: the visitors’ shot conversion rate is 13% versus FH’s 8%, and ÍBV scores 1.6 goals on the road with xG 1.4, whereas FH averages 1.25 goals at home with xG 1.82, indicating the hosts are failing to convert chances. FH attempts more shots (15 on average and 4.25 on target at home), but lower efficiency and a lack of clean sheets (0%) weaken their home advantage. Both teams are defensively vulnerable (FH concedes 2.0 goals at home, ÍBV 2.4 away), so I expect multiple goals and an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have very high season BTTS rates: FH 83% and ÍBV 80%, versus the league average of 72%, which historically strongly favors both sides scoring. Season goal averages show FH scores 2.0 and concedes 2.17 per game, while ÍBV scores 1.6 and concedes 2.4, so both teams regularly participate in Goal/Goal matches. In the last 5 matches ÍBV scored 14 goals (2.8 per game) with 80% BTTS, and FH in that period scored 4 goals (0.8 per game) and conceded 10 (2.0 per game), indicating ÍBV is likely to register on the scoresheet and FH frequently concedes. Additionally both teams have a season clean sheet expected rate of 0%, total xG is 1.28 + 1.40 = 2.68, and total shots are approximately 10.5 + 12.4 = 22.9 (on target 4.5 + 3.6 = 8.1), suggesting numerous chances and supporting BTTS - Yes as more probable (85% vs 15%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Season statistics indicate very high goal potential: both teams have 100% of matches with over 1.5 goals (FH 100%, ÍBV 100%), and the league average goals per match is 4.06. An xG-based model (FH xG_for 1.28, ÍBV xG_for 1.40; FH xG_against 1.53, ÍBV xG_against 1.57) yields expected goals of 1.43 for the home side and 1.47 for the visitors, totalling 2.90 goals. Additionally, the percentage of matches where both teams scored is 83% for FH and 80% for ÍBV, and season Over2.5 rates are 67% (FH) and 80% (ÍBV) — the average is 73.5%, hence an estimated Over2.5 probability of about 74%. Over3.5 is less certain: season Over3.5 is 33% for FH and 60% for ÍBV (average 46.5%), so I assign Over3.5 47% vs 53% for Under3.5; furthermore, the home team averages 4.5 shots on target and 10.5 total shots with a 19% conversion, while the visitors average 3.6 shots on target and 12.4 total shots with a 13% conversion, which supports the offensive profile of the match. Therefore the strongest and most certain signal is Over 1.5 (both teams have 100% of such matches), so I recommend backing the over at the 1.5 line, while the 2.5 line also shows a clear market edge (estimated 74% vs 26%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT scenario is 1/1 — the home team leads at the break and maintains the win. The primary signal is that the hosts led at half-time in 50% of their matches and score on average 1.0 goals before the break versus 0.8 for ÍBV, with half-time goal averages of 2.0 compared to 1.6. Additionally, the home side has a higher average points per game (1.17 vs 0.8) and a noticeably better finishing rate (19% vs 13%), which partly offsets a slightly lower xG (1.28 vs 1.4 for the visitors) and increases the chance of holding the lead. Although ÍBV has better form in the last five matches (60% wins vs 20% for the hosts) and both teams frequently exchange goals (both sides manage to score in 83% of the hosts’ matches and 80% of the visitors’ matches), the half-time lead statistics and the hosts’ superior clinical edge prevail. One must still account for the risk of a turnaround — the home team conceded as many as four goals in minutes 46–60 — therefore 1/1 has the highest but moderate probability, and 1/2 remains a realistic alternative.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FH | ÍBV | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
ÍBV is 150% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - FH · 2 pts / match - ÍBV
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
ÍBV is 34% better for: goals scored per match.
1.36 goals / match - FH · 1.82 goals / match - ÍBV
ÍBV is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.55 goals / match - FH · 2.27 goals / match - ÍBV
FH scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while ÍBV keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 11 matches).
ÍBV scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while FH keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FH
Over / Under - ÍBV
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
ÍBV is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.27 pts / match - FH · 1.45 pts / match - ÍBV
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FH - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 9%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
ÍBV - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 27%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FH
ÍBV
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| FH | Liga | ÍBV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.91 | 4.06 | • 4.09 |
| Both teams scored | • 73% | 72% | ▲ 82% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 73% | 72% | • 73% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 14% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 91% | 84% | ▼ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 82% | 88% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): FH 0 - 2 - 1 ÍBV. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FH vs ÍBV?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished FH 1:1 ÍBV. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between FH and ÍBV?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches FH won 0, ÍBV won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before FH vs ÍBV?
FH score 1.36 goals per game on average and ÍBV 1.82. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 73% of FH's matches and 82% of ÍBV's.
What form are FH and ÍBV in?
Over the last 5 games FH have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and ÍBV 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FH vs ÍBV?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.