Firpo vs CD Platense: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Firpo played CD Platense in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 30 November 2025. Final score: 6:2.

Current form

Firpo: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. CD Platense: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Firpo scores 2.22 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. CD Platense scores 1.30 and concedes 1.26. League average: 2.74 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Firpo 61%, CD Platense 61%. Over 2.5: Firpo 65%, CD Platense 48%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Firpo has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.22. Firpo: 11.2 shots per match, CD Platense: 8.6.

Match halves

Firpo: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 1.39. CD Platense: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.78.

Goals by minute

Firpo: 61-75 (13 goals). CD Platense: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 33%.

Half-by-half

2 : 2
1st half
4 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
FirpoCD Platense
16Shots8
FirpoCD Platense
16Shots on target5
FirpoCD Platense
2.68xG1.32
FirpoCD Platense
6Corners2
FirpoCD Platense
75Dangerous attacks62
FirpoCD Platense
9Fouls9
FirpoCD Platense
0Cards0
FirpoCD Platense

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.22Goals scored / match1.3
FirpoCD Platense
1.13Goals conceded / match1.26
FirpoCD Platense
52%Average possession48%
FirpoCD Platense
5.35Shots on target / match3.7
FirpoCD Platense

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.17Shots per match8.61
FirpoCD Platense
5.35Shots on target3.7
FirpoCD Platense
19.8%Shot conversion15.2%
FirpoCD Platense
52%Possession48%
FirpoCD Platense
1.75xG for1.22
FirpoCD Platense
1.15xG against1.24
FirpoCD Platense

Shooting quality

Firpo: Efficient finishingCD Platense: Efficient finishing
FirpoCD Platense
Accuracy (shots on target)48%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Firpo is 160% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Firpo · 1 pts / match - CD Platense

Firpo
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
70% W22% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-5-2
2.30 pts / match · goal difference +25
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
CD Platense
DDWLL
Season result split
22% W48% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-11-7
1.13 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Firpo is 71% better for: goals scored per match.

2.22 goals / match - Firpo · 1.3 goals / match - CD Platense

Firpo is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - Firpo · 1.26 goals / match - CD Platense

Firpo scoring profile: very strong

Firpo scores in 91% of matches (21 of 23 matches), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).

CD Platense scoring profile: strong

CD Platense scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while Firpo keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).

51Goals scored (season)30
FirpoCD Platense
26Goals conceded (season)29
FirpoCD Platense
3.35Average goals in match2.57
FirpoCD Platense
13Goals scored (last 5)5
FirpoCD Platense
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
FirpoCD Platense

How often they score at least...

91%1 goal70%
FirpoCD Platense
70%2 goals35%
FirpoCD Platense
52%3 goals22%
FirpoCD Platense
9%4 goals4%
FirpoCD Platense

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal78%
FirpoCD Platense
26%2 goals30%
FirpoCD Platense
13%3 goals13%
FirpoCD Platense
4%4 goals4%
FirpoCD Platense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time22%
FirpoCD Platense
13%BTTS in both halves9%
FirpoCD Platense
52%Scored in both halves17%
FirpoCD Platense

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
FirpoCD Platense
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
FirpoCD Platense
80%BTTS - last 520%
FirpoCD Platense

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
FirpoCD Platense
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
FirpoCD Platense
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
FirpoCD Platense

2nd half

96%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
FirpoCD Platense
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
FirpoCD Platense
39%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
FirpoCD Platense

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Firpo is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.61 pts / match - Firpo · 1.13 pts / match - CD Platense

Firpo - half-time state
39% leading43% draw17% trailing
CD Platense - half-time state
22% leading48% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.61Points per match (1st half)1.13
FirpoCD Platense
0.83Goals scored (1st half)0.52
FirpoCD Platense
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.61
FirpoCD Platense
1.3Average goals (1st half)1.13
FirpoCD Platense
65%Clean sheet before half-time48%
FirpoCD Platense
43%No goal before half-time61%
FirpoCD Platense

After half-time (2nd half)

2.48Points per match (2nd half)1.13
FirpoCD Platense
1.39Goals scored (2nd half)0.78
FirpoCD Platense
0.65Goals conceded (2nd half)0.65
FirpoCD Platense
2.04Average goals (2nd half)1.43
FirpoCD Platense
52%Clean sheet after half-time52%
FirpoCD Platense
13%No goal after half-time52%
FirpoCD Platense

Firpo - second-half results

78% W13% R9% P
37
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
57
Second-half points
+17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding179%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 70%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Platense - second-half results

17% W61% R22% P
26
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Firpo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.60
Goals scored / match1.21.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference+3+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
CD Platense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Firpo
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
5
4
16-30
7
4
31-45
9
6
46-60
13
5
61-75
10
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
5
4
16-30
4
5
31-45
5
3
46-60
7
5
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.96
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Firpo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
164%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

FirpoLigaCD Platense
Average goals in match 3.352.74 2.57
Both teams scored 61%57% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%54% 48%
Clean sheets 35%26% 22%
Goal before half-time 65%69% 70%
Goal after half-time 96%76% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.74
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+-3%
Home attack advantage
+-3%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Nelson Vladimir Díaz Tobar⚽ 1
Víctor Vladimir García Campos⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

Emerson Alexander Rivas Sandoval⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FirpoGoalVíctor Vladimir García Campos
  2. CD PlatenseGoalEmerson Alexander Rivas Sandoval
  3. FirpoGoalNelson Vladimir Díaz Tobar

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Firpo 2 - 1 - 0 CD Platense. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

CD Platense
0 : 2
Firpo
CD Platense
1 : 3
Firpo
Firpo
0 : 0
CD Platense

FAQ

What was the result of Firpo vs CD Platense?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Firpo 6:2 CD Platense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Firpo and CD Platense?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Firpo won 2, CD Platense won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Firpo vs CD Platense?

Firpo score 2.22 goals per game on average and CD Platense 1.30. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Firpo's matches and 61% of CD Platense's.

What form are Firpo and CD Platense in?

Over the last 5 games Firpo have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and CD Platense 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Firpo vs CD Platense?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.