Firpo vs FAS: match statistics
Firpo vs FAS: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Firpo play FAS in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match date is 25 April 2026 at 02:00. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Firpo: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. FAS: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Firpo scores 1.88 and concedes 1.04 goals per match. FAS scores 2.10 and concedes 0.92. League average: 2.67 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Firpo 57%, FAS 52%. Over 2.5: Firpo 53%, FAS 52%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Firpo has higher xG: 1.73 vs 1.53. Firpo: 11.2 shots per match, FAS: 11.0.
Match halves
Firpo: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.24. FAS: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.12.
Goals by minute
Firpo: 61-75 (26 goals). FAS: 76-90+ (30 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Salvadoran Primera División: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
3 H2H matches: 2-0-1. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 67%.
Match description
I back the home win (1). Firpo concedes only 0.78 goals per home match on average and keeps a clean sheet in 52% of home games, while FAS scores 2.09 goals away but concedes 1.22, giving the hosts a defensive edge. Firpo produces higher home xG (1.98) and more shots (12.7 per match, 5.61 on target) than FAS away (xG 1.49, 10.09 shots, 5.05 on target), indicating better quality of attacking chances for the hosts. However, FAS are significantly more efficient in finishing (conversion 21% vs Firpo 13%) and actually score more away (2.09 vs 1.61), so they remain a real attacking threat. In the last 5 matches Firpo have 3 wins, 1 loss and 1 draw, averaging 2.0 points per game, while FAS have 4 wins and 1 draw, averaging about 2.6 points per game, giving a slight form edge to the visitors. Considering the superior chance quality (xG 1.98) and strong home defence (0.78 goals conceded), I forecast a Firpo victory, though I expect an open game with goals at both ends.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Firpo | FAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 45% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FAS is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Firpo · 1.6 pts / match - FAS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FAS is 12% better for: goals scored per match.
1.88 goals / match - Firpo · 2.1 goals / match - FAS
FAS is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.04 goals / match - Firpo · 0.92 goals / match - FAS
Firpo scores in 82% of matches (42 of 51 matches), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 38% (20 of 52 matches).
FAS scores in 88% of matches (46 of 52 matches), while Firpo keeps a clean sheet in 31% (16 of 51 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Firpo
Over / Under — FAS
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FAS is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / match - Firpo · 1.73 pts / match - FAS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Firpo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
FAS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (26 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +17 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (30 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +20 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Firpo
FAS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Firpo | Liga | FAS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.92 | 2.67 | ▲ 3.02 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 53% | • 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 50% | ▲ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 27% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | • 67% | 68% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 78% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Firpo 2 - 0 - 1 FAS. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Firpo vs FAS?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Firpo 1:1 FAS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Firpo and FAS?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Firpo won 2, FAS won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Firpo vs FAS?
Firpo score 1.88 goals per game on average and FAS 2.10. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Firpo's matches and 52% of FAS's.
What form are Firpo and FAS in?
Over the last 5 games Firpo have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and FAS 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Firpo vs FAS?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Firpo vs FAS: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.