El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónEstadio Sergio Torres RiveraData current as of 22 October 2026

Firpo vs Inter: match statistics

Firpo crest
Firpo
3 : 0half-time 3:0
Inter crest
Inter

Firpo vs Inter: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Firpo played Inter in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Venue: Estadio Sergio Torres Rivera. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Firpo: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Inter: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Firpo scores 1.50 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Inter scores 1.71 and concedes 0.43. League average: 2.54 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Firpo 33%, Inter 29%. Over 2.5: Firpo 33%, Inter 43%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Firpo has higher xG: 1.86 vs 1.58. Firpo: 12.7 shots per match, Inter: 8.0.

Match halves

Firpo: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.83. Inter: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.29.

Goals by minute

Firpo: 61-75 (3 goals). Inter: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-2-0. Average goals 1.75, BTTS 25%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Firpo have been outstanding at home: they have won all of their home matches so far, averaging 2.33 goals scored and conceding none. The hosts are also creating higher-quality chances, recording an average xG of 1.86 compared with just 0.99 xG conceded to opponents. Inter, however, are in excellent form, having scored 12 goals in their last five matches, winning four and remaining unbeaten throughout the season. Away from home, the visitors draw as many as 50% of their matches, while their xG against stands at 1.70, suggesting that their defence could struggle to contain Firpo’s attack. Home advantage, Firpo’s perfect record in front of goal at home and their clean-sheet record give the hosts a slight edge to win, although a draw remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal is the very low seasonal rate of matches in which both teams scored: 33% for Firpo and just 25% for Inter, compared with the league average of 49%. Both teams regularly keep clean sheets, in 67% and 75% of their matches respectively, while their average goals conceded stand at just 0.33 and 0.50 per game. Firpo have scored only 0.8 goals per match across their last five appearances, which clearly reduces the hosts’ chances of breaking through Inter’s solid defence, with Inter conceding just 0.6 goals per game during this period. Although Inter are enjoying a strong attacking run, averaging 2.4 goals in their last five matches, a one-sided result remains more likely than both teams scoring. The “BTTS - No” pick primarily indicates a high probability that at least one team will finish the match without scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is the low defensive profile of both teams: Firpo concede an average of 0.33 goals at home, while Inter concede just 0.50 away from home. In their last five matches, Firpo have scored only 0.8 goals per game, while Inter’s defence has allowed opponents an average of 0.6 goals. Inter are in significantly better attacking form, averaging 2.4 goals scored in their last five appearances, but Firpo have conceded just 0.8 goals per match over the same period. Additionally, matches involving both teams have finished below 3.5 goals in 67% and 75% of cases, respectively, while both teams have kept a clean sheet in at least 67% of matches. The projected total of 2.45 goals indicates a preference for Under 3.5 goals, which also provides a margin for a 2:1 or 1:2 result.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an Inter win, as Firpo were level at the break in 67% of their home matches, while Inter recorded a half-time draw in 50% of their away fixtures. The hosts score just 0.33 goals per match before the break at home and have yet to concede during this phase, which supports a cautious 0-0 HT/FT pattern. Inter are nevertheless clearly superior in current form: across their last five matches, they averaged 2.4 goals, won 80% of their games and remained unbeaten, whereas Firpo averaged 0.8 goals and recorded a 40% win rate. After half-time, Inter have recently averaged 1.8 goals, compared with just 0.2 for Firpo, while their second-half goal difference stands at +8 against +1 for the hosts. In addition, Inter’s season-long xG is 1.70, higher than Firpo’s 1.46, so following an even first half, the visitors have stronger grounds to turn the match in their favour.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
FirpoInter
14Shots2
FirpoInter
7Shots on target1
FirpoInter
2.1xG0.58
FirpoInter
6Corners1
FirpoInter
100Dangerous attacks51
FirpoInter
14Fouls7
FirpoInter
0Cards0
FirpoInter

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.5Goals scored / match1.71
FirpoInter
0.67Goals conceded / match0.43
FirpoInter
53%Average possession56%
FirpoInter
7.67Shots on target / match3.86
FirpoInter

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.67Shots per match8
FirpoInter
7.67Shots on target3.86
FirpoInter
11.8%Shot conversion21.4%
FirpoInter
53%Possession56%
FirpoInter
1.86xG for1.58
FirpoInter
1.18xG against1.47
FirpoInter

Shooting quality

Firpo: BalancedInter: Efficient finishing
FirpoInter
Accuracy (shots on target)61%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Inter is 30% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Firpo · 2.6 pts / match - Inter

Firpo
WWDWL
Season result split
50% W33% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-1
1.83 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-0
Last 5 at home
3-0-0
WWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.90Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Inter
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
57% W43% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-0
2.14 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-0
Last 5 away
2-2-0
DDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Inter is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Firpo · 1.71 goals / match - Inter

Inter is 56% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.67 goals / match - Firpo · 0.43 goals / match - Inter

Firpo scoring profile: mixed

Firpo scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 71% (5 of 7 matches).

Inter scoring profile: mixed

Inter scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Firpo keeps a clean sheet in 67% (4 of 6 matches).

9Goals scored (season)12
FirpoInter
4Goals conceded (season)3
FirpoInter
2.17Average goals in match2.14
FirpoInter
8Goals scored (last 5)12
FirpoInter
3Goals conceded (last 5)3
FirpoInter

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal71%
FirpoInter
33%2 goals57%
FirpoInter
17%3 goals29%
FirpoInter
17%4 goals14%
FirpoInter

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal29%
FirpoInter
17%2 goals14%
FirpoInter
17%3 goals0%
FirpoInter
0%4 goals0%
FirpoInter

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time14%
FirpoInter
0%BTTS in both halves0%
FirpoInter
33%Scored in both halves29%
FirpoInter

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
FirpoInter
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
FirpoInter
20%BTTS - last 540%
FirpoInter

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time43%
FirpoInter
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
FirpoInter
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
FirpoInter

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
FirpoInter
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
FirpoInter
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
FirpoInter

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Firpo is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.83 pts / match - Firpo · 1.43 pts / match - Inter

Firpo - half-time state
50% leading33% draw17% trailing
Inter - half-time state
29% leading57% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.83Points per match (1st half)1.43
FirpoInter
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.43
FirpoInter
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
FirpoInter
1.17Average goals (1st half)0.71
FirpoInter
83%Clean sheet before half-time86%
FirpoInter
50%No goal before half-time57%
FirpoInter

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)2.14
FirpoInter
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)1.29
FirpoInter
0.17Goals conceded (2nd half)0.14
FirpoInter
1Average goals (2nd half)1.43
FirpoInter
83%Clean sheet after half-time86%
FirpoInter
33%No goal after half-time43%
FirpoInter

Firpo - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Inter - second-half results

57% W43% D0% L
10
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding197%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Firpo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.20
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.0
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Inter - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.60
Goals scored / match0.61.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+8
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Firpo
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
0
46-60
3
1
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Inter
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
4
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
4
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.15
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
31%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Firpo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.68
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
157%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
29%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.9
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

FirpoLigaInter
Average goals in match▼ 2.172.54▼ 2.14
Both teams scored▼ 33%48%▼ 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 33%43%• 43%
Clean sheets▲ 67%33%▲ 71%
Goal before half-time▲ 67%59%▼ 43%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%72%▼ 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.54
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Diego Alexis Ortez Argueta⚽ 1
—Luis Styven Vásquez Velásquez⚽ 1
—Rafael Águila⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FirpoGoalRafael Águila
  2. FirpoGoalDiego Alexis Ortez Argueta

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Firpo 2 - 2 - 0 Inter. Average goals 1.75, both teams scored in 25% matches.

Inter
0 : 3
Firpo
Firpo
0 : 0
Inter
Inter
1 : 1
Firpo
Firpo
2 : 0
Inter

FAQ

What was the result of Firpo vs Inter?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Firpo 3:0 Inter. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Firpo and Inter?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Firpo won 2, Inter won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Firpo vs Inter?

Firpo score 1.50 goals per game on average and Inter 1.71. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Firpo's matches and 29% of Inter's.

What form are Firpo and Inter in?

Over the last 5 games Firpo have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Inter 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Firpo vs Inter?

The statistical background for Firpo vs Inter — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.