Scotland - League TwoData current as of 12 September 2026

Forfar Athletic vs East Kilbride: match statistics

Forfar Athletic vs East Kilbride: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Forfar Athletic played East Kilbride in League Two (Scotland). The match was played on 11 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Forfar Athletic: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. East Kilbride: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Forfar Athletic scores 1.38 and concedes 1.41 goals per match. East Kilbride scores 2.09 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.94 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Forfar Athletic 56%, East Kilbride 69%. Over 2.5: Forfar Athletic 53%, East Kilbride 69%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

East Kilbride has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.16. Forfar Athletic: 8.1 shots per match, East Kilbride: 10.1.

Match halves

Forfar Athletic: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.47. East Kilbride: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 0.78.

Goals by minute

Forfar Athletic: 31-45+ (12 goals). East Kilbride: 31-45+ (20 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League Two: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

East Kilbride appears to be the favorite: they sit 1st in the table with 18 wins, 7 draws and 7 losses this season, while Forfar Athletic has recorded 10 wins, 10 draws and 12 losses. In the last 5 matches the visitors have scored 10 goals and average 2.2 points per game (3 wins, 2 draws), whereas Forfar have only 5 goals and average 1.0 point per game (1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses). Offensively East Kilbride is more productive — averaging 2.19 goals away, 9.88 shots per match and 5 shots on target with a 22% conversion rate, versus Forfar at home 1.56 goals, 8.44 shots and 4.63 on target with a 19% conversion. Defensively both teams concede on average 1.31 goals per match, but the visitors have a higher xG (1.37 vs 1.25) and a much lower percentage of matches without scoring (6% for East vs 19% for Forfar), indicating East creates and converts better chances. Considering the edge in efficiency, greater number of shots on target and stronger last-five form, I predict a win for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS is strongly supported by history — Forfar Athletic have BTTS in 63% of matches and East Kilbride in 75%, versus a league average of 64%. Over the last 5 meetings these figures are 60% and 80% respectively, indicating East Kilbride in particular has recently been consistently involved in Goal/Goal outcomes. Seasonal goals averages are 2.0 for Forfar and 2.19 for East Kilbride, with goals conceded averages of 1.44 and 1.31; in the last 5 matches Forfar scored 5 and conceded 7, while East Kilbride scored 10 and conceded 5, so both teams create and concede chances. xG confirms this picture: attacking xG 1.44 vs 1.37 and xG against 1.14 vs 1.20, with average shots on target 5.19 and 5.0, indicating a realistic exchange of opportunities. The low percentage of clean sheets (25% and 19%) and the high percentage of matches over 2.5 goals (69% for both) reinforce the 'both teams to score' scenario; therefore I pick BTTS - Yes with a probability of 80% and No 20%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match projects as a goal-rich affair: Forfar averages 2.0 goals per game, East Kilbride 2.19, and the league averages 2.94 goals per match. Based on xG, I estimate 1.32 goals for Forfar (attacking xG 1.44 vs opponent defensive xG 1.20, average 1.32) and 1.26 for East Kilbride (attacking xG 1.37 vs opponent defensive xG 1.14, average 1.26), totaling ~2.58 goals. Season stats confirm this: Over 1.5 occurs in Forfar’s matches in 100% and in East Kilbride’s in 94%; Over 2.5 in 69% for both teams; matches involving both sides have seen BTTS in 63% and 75% of cases — all of which increases the likelihood of at least 2–3 goals. Therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (very high 100%/94%); Over 2.5 is moderately likely (~69%); Over 3.5 is less certain given the combined xG ~2.58 (estimated Over 3.5 ~45% vs Under 55%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistical analysis shows Forfar hold the advantage at the break: the hosts led at half-time in 63% of matches (10 instances) and score on average 1.38 goals in the first half, while East Kilbride average 1.25 first-half goals and lead at the break in 50% of games. Over the full 90 minutes both teams have similar attacking metrics (average xG 1.44 for Forfar versus 1.37 for East Kilbride) and both have 56% win rate this season, which supports maintaining the home side’s advantage. However, the visitors’ second-half strength must be taken into account: East Kilbride have a 60% win rate in the last 5 matches (vs 20% for Forfar) and score on average 0.94 goals after the break compared to 0.63 for the hosts, with second-half goal difference +6 for the visitors vs -2 for Forfar. Considering the high share of matches with a goal before half-time for the hosts (94% vs 81% for the visitors) and Forfar’s dominance in half-time statistics, the most likely scenario is the hosts leading at the break and Forfar winning the match (HT/FT 1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

41Possession (%)59
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
7Shots5
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
5Shots on target2
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
1.11xG0.94
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
4Corners3
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
45Dangerous attacks67
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
5Fouls17
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
1Cards4
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
1.38Goals scored / match2.09
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
1.41Goals conceded / match1.38
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
48%Average possession54%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
4.09Shots on target / match5.09
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.13Shots per match10.13
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
4.09Shots on target5.09
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
16.9%Shot conversion20.7%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
48%Possession54%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
1.16xG for1.41
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
1.23xG against1.16
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride

Shooting quality

Forfar Athletic: Efficient finishingEast Kilbride: Efficient finishing
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
Accuracy (shots on target)50%50%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

East Kilbride is 120% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Forfar Athletic · 2.2 pts / match - East Kilbride

Forfar Athletic
LDLDW
Season result split
31% W31% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-10-12
1.25 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-5-4
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
East Kilbride
WDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
56% W22% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
18-7-7
1.91 pts / match · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-4-3
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WWWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 0.84BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

East Kilbride is 51% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Forfar Athletic · 2.09 goals / match - East Kilbride

Forfar Athletic scoring profile: very strong

Forfar Athletic scores in 72% of matches (23 of 32 matches), while East Kilbride keeps a clean sheet in 22% (7 of 32 matches).

East Kilbride scoring profile: very strong

East Kilbride scores in 91% of matches (29 of 32 matches), while Forfar Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

44Goals scored (season)67
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
45Goals conceded (season)44
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
2.78Average goals in match3.47
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
5Goals scored (last 5)10
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal91%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
38%2 goals59%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
16%3 goals41%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
13%4 goals9%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal78%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
41%2 goals38%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
19%3 goals13%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
3%4 goals3%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time28%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
13%BTTS in both halves3%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
22%Scored in both halves28%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
60%BTTS - last 580%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time69%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time38%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Forfar Athletic - half-time state
50% leading34% draw16% trailing
East Kilbride - half-time state
56% leading19% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.84Points per match (1st half)1.88
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
0.91Goals scored (1st half)1.31
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.72
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
1.47Average goals (1st half)2.03
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
59%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
41%No goal before half-time28%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per match (2nd half)1.28
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.78
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
0.84Goals conceded (2nd half)0.66
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
1.31Average goals (2nd half)1.44
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
41%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride
66%No goal after half-time53%
Forfar AthleticEast Kilbride

Forfar Athletic - second-half results

16% W47% D38% L
59
Half-time points
29
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.84
PPG before half-time
Lead holding62%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 31%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

East Kilbride - second-half results

31% W34% D34% L
60
Half-time points
42
Half-time goals
+19
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Forfar Athletic - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match1.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.60.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
East Kilbride - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+4+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Forfar Athletic
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
10
8
16-30
12
4
31-45
4
7
46-60
6
7
61-75
5
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

East Kilbride
ScoredConceded
10
10
0-15
12
6
16-30
20
7
31-45
8
5
46-60
7
6
61-75
10
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (20 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Forfar Athletic

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

East Kilbride

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.68
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
145%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).

Teams vs league

Forfar AthleticLigaEast Kilbride
Average goals in match 2.782.94 3.47
Both teams scored 56%64% 69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%57% 69%
Clean sheets 25%21% 22%
Goal before half-time 75%74% 88%
Goal after half-time 69%78% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.94
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.49
Home goals / match
1.44
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Forfar AthleticGoalStuart MorrisonAssist: Craig Slater
  2. East KilbrideYellow cardJohn Robertson
  3. Forfar AthleticYellow cardScott Shepherd
  4. East KilbrideYellow cardJack Leitch
  5. East KilbrideYellow cardJordan McGregor
  6. East KilbrideYellow cardSean Fagan
  7. Forfar AthleticSubstitutionOn: Jamie RichardsonOff: Jake Sutherland

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Josh HayMatches officiated: 14
3.64Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 243%Home wins36%Draws21%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Forfar Athletic 0 - 0 - 3 East Kilbride. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Forfar Athletic vs East Kilbride?

The League Two match finished Forfar Athletic 1:0 East Kilbride. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Forfar Athletic and East Kilbride?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Forfar Athletic won 0, East Kilbride won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Forfar Athletic vs East Kilbride?

Forfar Athletic score 1.38 goals per game on average and East Kilbride 2.09. The League Two average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Forfar Athletic's matches and 69% of East Kilbride's.

What form are Forfar Athletic and East Kilbride in?

Over the last 5 games Forfar Athletic have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and East Kilbride 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Forfar Athletic vs East Kilbride?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Forfar Athletic vs East Kilbride: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.