United States - USL League OneData current as of 17 October 2026

Fort Wayne vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: match statistics

Fort Wayne vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Fort Wayne played Chattanooga Red Wolves in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 15 August 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Fort Wayne: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Fort Wayne scores 1.32 and concedes 1.16 goals per match. Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.82 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.87 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Fort Wayne 42%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 59%. Over 2.5: Fort Wayne 47%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 65%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Fort Wayne has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.42. Fort Wayne: 13.2 shots per match, Chattanooga Red Wolves: 11.6.

Match halves

Fort Wayne: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.58. Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Fort Wayne: 0-15 (6 goals). Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.87 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Fort Wayne have clear home-field advantages: they win 50% of their matches there, score an average of 1.63 goals, and concede just 0.63 goals per game. Chattanooga Red Wolves score slightly more frequently away from home, averaging 1.75 goals per match, but their defense concedes as many as 2.13 goals on average and has kept no clean sheets. The hosts also create marginally better-quality chances, with an average xG of 1.60 compared with 1.51 for the visitors, while also enjoying more possession (54% to 36%). Recent form nevertheless favors Red Wolves, who have won 3 of their last 5 matches, whereas Fort Wayne have suffered 4 defeats in their last five outings. Despite their weaker current form, Fort Wayne’s home solidity and the visitors’ highly vulnerable defense give the hosts a slight edge.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The scenario of both sides scoring is primarily supported by Chattanooga’s defense, which has failed to keep a clean sheet even once this season and concedes an average of 2.13 goals per match. Fort Wayne scores an average of 1.89 goals at home, with a shot conversion rate of 18%, so they should be able to exploit their opponent’s defensive weakness. Chattanooga scores an average of 1.75 goals, produces a higher xG than the hosts (1.51 vs. 1.34), and records 4.88 shots on target per match, giving them a realistic chance of scoring despite Fort Wayne’s 56% clean-sheet rate for the season. In their last five matches, both teams conceded 2.0 goals per match, while BTTS occurred in 60% of Chattanooga’s games and 40% of Fort Wayne’s, indicating noticeably weaker current defensive stability for the hosts. Fort Wayne’s season-long BTTS rate is only 33%, but Chattanooga’s 88% rate and the current problems affecting both defenses outweigh this in favor of the "BTTS - Yes" pick.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Chattanooga went over 1.5 goals in 100% of their league matches and over 2.5 goals in 88%, clearly supporting a scenario with at least two goals. Fort Wayne averaged 1.89 goals per match, while the visitors conceded as many as 2.13, and both teams conceded 2.0 goals per game across their last five appearances. The hosts should create around 1.65 goals, as their recent xG stands at 1.54, while Chattanooga allowed opponents an xG of 1.99 over their last five matches. Fort Wayne’s defense kept a clean sheet in 56% of the entire season, making the projection for the visitors more cautious, but their average of 1.75 goals scored and 4.88 shots on target per match still raise the expected total to 2.90. The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as it combines the very high historical hit rate of both profiles with a clear decline in the hosts’ defensive performance during their recent run.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Fort Wayne has a clearly stronger record over the course of the season: they win 67% of their matches, score an average of 1.89 goals, and concede just 0.89, while Chattanooga lose 50% of their games and allow opponents to score 2.13 goals per match. The hosts control the early stages of matches well, having kept a clean sheet at half-time in 56% of their appearances, whereas the visitors concede an average of 1.13 goals in the first half. Chattanooga are nevertheless dangerous in attack, averaging 4.88 shots on target and scoring 1.8 goals over their last five matches, meaning second-half turnaround scenarios remain relevant. The strongest individual outcome, however, remains Fort Wayne leading at the break and maintaining that advantage until full-time, supported by the hosts’ 56% clean-sheet rate in their matches overall and the visitors’ defensive weaknesses.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

69Possession (%)31
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
16Shots8
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
6Shots on target2
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
2.07xG0.86
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
10Corners3
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
88Dangerous attacks29
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
14Fouls10
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
4Cards2
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
1.32Goals scored / match1.82
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
1.16Goals conceded / match1.47
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
52%Average possession37%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
4.47Shots on target / match4.24
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.16Shots per match11.59
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
4.47Shots on target4.24
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
10%Shot conversion15.7%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
52%Possession37%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
1.51xG for1.42
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
1.46xG against1.67
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves

Shooting quality

Fort Wayne: BalancedChattanooga Red Wolves: Counter-attacking
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
Accuracy (shots on target)34%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Fort Wayne · 1.8 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Fort Wayne
LWLLL
Season result split
37% W32% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-6-6
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Chattanooga Red Wolves
WWWLL
Season result split
53% W6% D41% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-1-7
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-4
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.97BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 38% better for: goals scored per match.

1.32 goals / match - Fort Wayne · 1.82 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Fort Wayne is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.16 goals / match - Fort Wayne · 1.47 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Fort Wayne scoring profile: very strong

Fort Wayne scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

Chattanooga Red Wolves scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while Fort Wayne keeps a clean sheet in 37% (7 of 19 matches).

25Goals scored (season)31
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
22Goals conceded (season)25
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
2.47Average goals in match3.29
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
5Goals scored (last 5)9
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
10Goals conceded (last 5)10
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal88%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
37%2 goals53%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
21%3 goals18%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
0%4 goals18%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal71%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
42%2 goals47%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
11%3 goals18%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
0%4 goals6%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

59%
Chattanooga Red Wolves - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 17 matches
56%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time35%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
16%Scored in both halves24%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS59%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
40%BTTS - last 560%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fort Wayne is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.58 pts / match - Fort Wayne · 1.29 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Fort Wayne - half-time state
42% leading32% draw26% trailing
Chattanooga Red Wolves - half-time state
29% leading41% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.58Points per match (1st half)1.29
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
0.74Goals scored (1st half)0.82
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.82
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
1.16Average goals (1st half)1.65
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
63%Clean sheet before half-time41%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
53%No goal before half-time47%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves

After half-time (2nd half)

1.32Points per match (2nd half)1.59
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
0.58Goals scored (2nd half)1
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.65
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
1.21Average goals (2nd half)1.65
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
58%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves
58%No goal after half-time41%
Fort WayneChattanooga Red Wolves

Fort Wayne - second-half results

32% W37% D32% L
30
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.58
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 37%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results

47% W18% D35% L
22
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding183%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fort Wayne - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.4
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+2-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Chattanooga Red Wolves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Fort Wayne
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
3
3
16-30
5
3
31-45
6
3
46-60
4
4
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
ScoredConceded
5
10
0-15
5
0
16-30
4
4
31-45
8
4
46-60
4
4
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-65%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Fort Wayne

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.82
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
4% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
4%

Chattanooga Red Wolves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
165%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Fort WayneLigaChattanooga Red Wolves
Average goals in match▼ 2.472.87▲ 3.29
Both teams scored▼ 42%56%▲ 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 47%59%▲ 65%
Clean sheets▲ 37%25%▲ 29%
Goal before half-time▲ 74%69%▲ 76%
Goal after half-time▼ 68%78%▲ 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.87
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.10
Away goals / match
+62%
Home attack advantage
+38%
Home defence advantage
+34%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardOluwatobilba Adewole
  2. Fort WayneYellow cardSven Michael Rempel
  3. Fort WayneGoalRyan BecherAssist: Javier Armas Pastor
  4. Chattanooga Red WolvesGoalYanis Lelin VegasAssist: Kwamina Ropapa Mensah
  5. Fort WayneYellow cardJavier Armas Pastor
  6. Fort WayneYellow cardClarence Awoudor
  7. Chattanooga Red WolvesGoalGreyson Mercer
  8. Fort WayneSubstitutionOn: Daniel OyetundeOff: Sven Michael Rempel
  9. Fort WayneSubstitutionOn: Jeremy GarayOff: Emerson Nieto
  10. Chattanooga Red WolvesSubstitutionOn: Beto ApolinarOff: Jordan Ayimbila
  11. Fort WayneYellow cardJeremy Garay
  12. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardMichael Knapp

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Fort Wayne 1 - 0 - 0 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Fort Wayne vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?

The USL League One match finished Fort Wayne 1:2 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Fort Wayne vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?

Fort Wayne score 1.32 goals per game on average and Chattanooga Red Wolves 1.82. The USL League One average is 2.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Fort Wayne's matches and 59% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's.

What form are Fort Wayne and Chattanooga Red Wolves in?

Over the last 5 games Fort Wayne have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Chattanooga Red Wolves 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fort Wayne vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?

The statistical background for Fort Wayne vs Chattanooga Red Wolves — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.