Fort Wayne vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: match statistics
Fort Wayne vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Fort Wayne played Chattanooga Red Wolves in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 15 August 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Fort Wayne: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Fort Wayne scores 1.32 and concedes 1.16 goals per match. Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.82 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.87 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Fort Wayne 42%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 59%. Over 2.5: Fort Wayne 47%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 65%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Fort Wayne has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.42. Fort Wayne: 13.2 shots per match, Chattanooga Red Wolves: 11.6.
Match halves
Fort Wayne: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.58. Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Fort Wayne: 0-15 (6 goals). Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.87 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Fort Wayne have clear home-field advantages: they win 50% of their matches there, score an average of 1.63 goals, and concede just 0.63 goals per game. Chattanooga Red Wolves score slightly more frequently away from home, averaging 1.75 goals per match, but their defense concedes as many as 2.13 goals on average and has kept no clean sheets. The hosts also create marginally better-quality chances, with an average xG of 1.60 compared with 1.51 for the visitors, while also enjoying more possession (54% to 36%). Recent form nevertheless favors Red Wolves, who have won 3 of their last 5 matches, whereas Fort Wayne have suffered 4 defeats in their last five outings. Despite their weaker current form, Fort Wayne’s home solidity and the visitors’ highly vulnerable defense give the hosts a slight edge.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The scenario of both sides scoring is primarily supported by Chattanooga’s defense, which has failed to keep a clean sheet even once this season and concedes an average of 2.13 goals per match. Fort Wayne scores an average of 1.89 goals at home, with a shot conversion rate of 18%, so they should be able to exploit their opponent’s defensive weakness. Chattanooga scores an average of 1.75 goals, produces a higher xG than the hosts (1.51 vs. 1.34), and records 4.88 shots on target per match, giving them a realistic chance of scoring despite Fort Wayne’s 56% clean-sheet rate for the season. In their last five matches, both teams conceded 2.0 goals per match, while BTTS occurred in 60% of Chattanooga’s games and 40% of Fort Wayne’s, indicating noticeably weaker current defensive stability for the hosts. Fort Wayne’s season-long BTTS rate is only 33%, but Chattanooga’s 88% rate and the current problems affecting both defenses outweigh this in favor of the "BTTS - Yes" pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Chattanooga went over 1.5 goals in 100% of their league matches and over 2.5 goals in 88%, clearly supporting a scenario with at least two goals. Fort Wayne averaged 1.89 goals per match, while the visitors conceded as many as 2.13, and both teams conceded 2.0 goals per game across their last five appearances. The hosts should create around 1.65 goals, as their recent xG stands at 1.54, while Chattanooga allowed opponents an xG of 1.99 over their last five matches. Fort Wayne’s defense kept a clean sheet in 56% of the entire season, making the projection for the visitors more cautious, but their average of 1.75 goals scored and 4.88 shots on target per match still raise the expected total to 2.90. The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as it combines the very high historical hit rate of both profiles with a clear decline in the hosts’ defensive performance during their recent run.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Fort Wayne has a clearly stronger record over the course of the season: they win 67% of their matches, score an average of 1.89 goals, and concede just 0.89, while Chattanooga lose 50% of their games and allow opponents to score 2.13 goals per match. The hosts control the early stages of matches well, having kept a clean sheet at half-time in 56% of their appearances, whereas the visitors concede an average of 1.13 goals in the first half. Chattanooga are nevertheless dangerous in attack, averaging 4.88 shots on target and scoring 1.8 goals over their last five matches, meaning second-half turnaround scenarios remain relevant. The strongest individual outcome, however, remains Fort Wayne leading at the break and maintaining that advantage until full-time, supported by the hosts’ 56% clean-sheet rate in their matches overall and the visitors’ defensive weaknesses.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Fort Wayne | Chattanooga Red Wolves | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Fort Wayne · 1.8 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 38% better for: goals scored per match.
1.32 goals / match - Fort Wayne · 1.82 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Fort Wayne is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.16 goals / match - Fort Wayne · 1.47 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Fort Wayne scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while Fort Wayne keeps a clean sheet in 37% (7 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fort Wayne
Over / Under - Chattanooga Red Wolves
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fort Wayne is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.58 pts / match - Fort Wayne · 1.29 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fort Wayne - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 37%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Fort Wayne
Chattanooga Red Wolves
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Fort Wayne | Liga | Chattanooga Red Wolves | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.47 | 2.87 | ▲ 3.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 56% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 59% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 37% | 25% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 74% | 69% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 78% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Fort Wayne 1 - 0 - 0 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Fort Wayne vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
The USL League One match finished Fort Wayne 1:2 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Fort Wayne vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
Fort Wayne score 1.32 goals per game on average and Chattanooga Red Wolves 1.82. The USL League One average is 2.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Fort Wayne's matches and 59% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's.
What form are Fort Wayne and Chattanooga Red Wolves in?
Over the last 5 games Fort Wayne have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Chattanooga Red Wolves 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fort Wayne vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
The statistical background for Fort Wayne vs Chattanooga Red Wolves — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


