Fram vs FH: match statistics
Fram vs FH: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Fram played FH in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 26 July 2026. Venue: Laugardalsvöllur. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Fram: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. FH: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Fram scores 2.73 and concedes 1.87 goals per match. FH scores 1.33 and concedes 2.07. League average: 4.07 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Fram 73%, FH 67%. Over 2.5: Fram 73%, FH 60%. League level: BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 73%.
xG, shots and style
Fram has higher xG: 2.03 vs 1.72. Fram: 17.7 shots per match, FH: 13.6.
Match halves
Fram: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 1.40. FH: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.47.
Goals by minute
Fram: 46-60 (8 goals). FH: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Úrvalsdeild: 4.07 goals per match, BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 73%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 75%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Fram holds a clear home advantage: they sit 3rd and win 71% of their home matches, scoring an average of 3.43 goals and conceding 2.29 (home goal difference +8). FH are 11th, winning only 14% of away games, scoring 1.43 and conceding 2.86 on average, with an overall away goal difference of -10. Fram generates far more chances (avg. 17.57 shots and 6.86 on target per home match) and has a higher home xG of 2.07 versus 1.40 xG for FH away, clearly indicating better quality of created opportunities. Additionally, Fram have a lower share of matches without scoring (14% vs 29%) and have scored 12 goals in their last 5 fixtures (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss), while FH have scored 6 and recorded 4 draws, limiting the visitors’ chances of a full points haul. Based on this I recommend a home win; I estimate probabilities of approx. 65% for Fram, 20% for a draw and 15% for an FH victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The “both teams to score” market looks more likely as Fram has BTTS at 63% and FH at 71%, versus a league average of 74%, indicating a strong scoring trend in the league. Fram generates 2.00 xG per game with an average of 5.75 shots on target and 15.5 shots, while FH allows opponents 2.25 xG and concedes 2.86 goals per game season-to-date, so the home side has clear opportunities to score. In the last 5 matches Fram averages 2.4 goals, FH 1.2 goals, and both teams have BTTS in 60% of recent matches each, which corroborates the seasonal signals. A counterpoint is that Fram has a 25% chance of a clean sheet over the season and concedes 1.8 goals on average in the last 5, but FH has no clean sheets (0%) and a high percentage of matches over 2.5 goals (86%), so the scenario where both teams score is stronger. Given the above figures (63% vs 71% BTTS, league 74%, xG 2.00 vs 2.25 and FH’s seasonal 2.86 conceded), I assign 78% probability to BTTS - Yes and 22% to No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and offensive metrics yield expected goals of 2.13 for Fram and 1.55 for FH, totaling 3.68. Calculations are based on xG: Fram generates xG 2.0 per match while FH concedes xG 2.25 (2.13 average for the home side); FH posts xG 1.4 against Fram’s defense, which concedes xG 1.7 (1.55 average for the away side). With this lambda, a Poisson model produces a high probability of Over 1.5 goals (~88%) and a significant probability of Over 2.5 goals (~71%); additionally the league averages 4.04 goals per game and 73% of matches exceed 2.5 goals. Both teams have a high BTTS rate: Fram 63% and FH 71%, and FH concedes on average 2.86 goals per match, which favors an elevated total. Therefore the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (over), although Over 2.5 also has meaningful backing (≈71%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal concerns the Half-Time market: Fram led at the break in 4 of 8 matches (50%), while FH were trailing at half-time in 5 of 7 games (71%), clearly favoring the home side in the first 45 minutes. The numbers are supported by offensive and defensive metrics: Fram average 1.0 goals by half-time and concede 0.38, whereas FH score 0.71 and concede 1.86; over the full match FH concede an average of 2.86 goals, and the home side’s xG is 2.0 versus xG against FH 2.25, indicating Fram’s superiority in chances. On the other hand, season-long and recent form show many draws and both-teams-to-score outcomes — Fram record 50% draws at home, FH have 4 draws in their last 5 matches (80%), and both teams score in 74% of league games, which increases the chance of an equalizer in the second half. As a result, my most likely pick is HT/FT 1/X (Fram leading at half-time, draw after 90 minutes) at roughly 30% probability, with the strongest alternative scenario being 1/1 (around 18%) due to FH’s defensive weakness.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Fram | FH | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Fram is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Fram · 1.4 pts / match - FH
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fram is 105% better for: goals scored per match.
2.73 goals / match - Fram · 1.33 goals / match - FH
Fram is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.87 goals / match - Fram · 2.07 goals / match - FH
Fram scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while FH keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
FH scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Fram keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fram
Over / Under - FH
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fram is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.8 pts / match - Fram · 1.33 pts / match - FH
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fram - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
FH - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Fram
FH
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| Fram | Liga | FH | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.60 | 4.07 | ▼ 3.40 |
| Both teams scored | • 73% | 74% | ▼ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 73% | 73% | ▼ 60% |
| Clean sheets | • 13% | 14% | • 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 73% | 83% | ▼ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 88% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Fram 3 - 1 - 0 FH. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 75% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Fram vs FH?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished Fram 0:0 FH. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Fram and FH?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Fram won 3, FH won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Fram vs FH?
Fram score 2.73 goals per game on average and FH 1.33. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Fram's matches and 67% of FH's.
What form are Fram and FH in?
Over the last 5 games Fram have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and FH 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fram vs FH?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.