Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildLaugardalsvöllurData current as of 15 October 2026

Fram vs KA: match statistics

Fram crest
Fram
2 : 2half-time 1:1
KA crest
KA

Fram vs KA: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Fram played KA in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Venue: Laugardalsvöllur. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Fram: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. KA: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Fram scores 2.60 and concedes 1.90 goals per match. KA scores 1.55 and concedes 2.25. League average: 3.93 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Fram 75%, KA 65%. Over 2.5: Fram 75%, KA 65%. League level: BTTS 70%, Over 2.5 69%.

xG, shots and style

Fram has higher xG: 2.02 vs 1.66. Fram: 17.8 shots per match, KA: 14.8.

Match halves

Fram: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.15. KA: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.90.

Goals by minute

Fram: 31-45+ (12 goals). KA: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Úrvalsdeild: 3.93 goals per match, BTTS 70%, Over 2.5 69%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Fram sit 3rd and have won 13 of their 20 league matches, while KA are only 11th with 4 wins and 12 defeats. The hosts are significantly more effective at home, scoring an average of 2.9 goals per match with an xG of 2.12, whereas KA score 1.7 goals away from home with an xG of 1.76. Fram’s superiority is also evident in their chance creation: they average 18.1 shots and 6.4 shots on target per game, compared with KA’s 15 shots and 5.1 shots on target. The visitors are in very poor recent form, having failed to win any of their last five matches and conceding 13 goals, while Fram have recorded 3 wins during this period. Both teams’ defenses allow plenty of chances, but KA concede an average of 2.5 goals away from home and allow opponents an xG of 2.24, which significantly increases the hosts’ chances of winning.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - Yes pick is supported by KA’s high seasonal BTTS rate of 80%, compared with 50% for Fram, while the league average is also a high 71%. In their last five matches, Fram scored 2.2 goals and conceded 2.0, whereas KA scored 1.4 goals but allowed opponents as many as 2.6. The attacking potential of both sides is confirmed by their xG figures: Fram averages 1.57 and KA 1.76, while their defensive xG conceded stands at 1.81 and 2.24 respectively. KA has kept a clean sheet in only 10% of matches, while Fram failed to score in 40%, which slightly reduces confidence; however, the visitors’ weak defence should significantly increase the home side’s chances of scoring. With an average of 3.95 goals per league match, an open game with goals at both ends is more likely than a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Fram averages 1.4 goals per match, but has increased that figure to 2.2 over its last five games, while KA has conceded as many as 2.6 goals per match during this period. The visitors’ defense remains a weak point over the broader sample as well, with KA conceding an average of 2.5 goals and recording a high 2.24 average xG conceded. Both teams regularly feature in open games: over 1.5 goals has been recorded in 70% of Fram’s matches and 90% of KA’s, while the Icelandic league boasts a very high average of 3.95 goals. In addition, Fram has recently created chances worth 1.98 xG, compared with 1.67 xG for KA, supporting a forecast of 3.58 total goals. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as even with a partial drop in finishing efficiency, the data from both teams clearly points to at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Fram have clearly improved their form: they have won 60% of their last five matches and averaged 2.2 goals per game, while KA have failed to win any of their matches and conceded an average of 2.6 goals. The hosts held a lead at the break in 3 of their last 5 appearances, scoring an average of 1.8 goals before half-time, whereas KA were ahead at half-time in only 20% of their matches and conceded 1.6 goals in the first halves. Fram’s attack also has a favourable matchup against the opposition defence, with the hosts averaging 1.57 xG, while KA allow opponents 2.24 xG per match. KA remain an offensive threat, averaging 1.7 goals scored this season with an xG of 1.76, but their average of 2.5 goals conceded per game undermines the credibility of an away-win scenario. The strongest HT/FT option is therefore Fram to lead at the break and maintain their advantage until the final whistle: 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
FramKA
18Shots9
FramKA
3Shots on target4
FramKA
2.18xG1.32
FramKA
12Corners1
FramKA
116Dangerous attacks64
FramKA
10Fouls5
FramKA
0Cards2
FramKA

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.6Goals scored / match1.55
FramKA
1.9Goals conceded / match2.25
FramKA
45%Average possession46%
FramKA
5.9Shots on target / match5.05
FramKA

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

17.8Shots per match14.8
FramKA
5.9Shots on target5.05
FramKA
14.6%Shot conversion10.5%
FramKA
45%Possession46%
FramKA
2.02xG for1.66
FramKA
1.56xG against2.03
FramKA

Shooting quality

Fram: Counter-attackingKA: Attacking
FramKA
Accuracy (shots on target)33%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fram is 400% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Fram · 0.4 pts / match - KA

Fram
DWLWW
Season result split
65% W20% D15% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-4-3
2.15 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.98Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
KA
DLLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W20% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-12
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-5
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 2.16BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fram is 68% better for: goals scored per match.

2.6 goals / match - Fram · 1.55 goals / match - KA

Fram is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.9 goals / match - Fram · 2.25 goals / match - KA

Fram scoring profile: very strong

Fram scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while KA keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 matches).

KA scoring profile: very strong

KA scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Fram keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 matches).

52Goals scored (season)31
FramKA
38Goals conceded (season)45
FramKA
4.5Average goals in match3.8
FramKA
11Goals scored (last 5)7
FramKA
10Goals conceded (last 5)13
FramKA

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal75%
FramKA
75%2 goals50%
FramKA
55%3 goals25%
FramKA
30%4 goals5%
FramKA

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal85%
FramKA
50%2 goals65%
FramKA
35%3 goals45%
FramKA
10%4 goals20%
FramKA

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time30%
FramKA
20%BTTS in both halves20%
FramKA
50%Scored in both halves30%
FramKA

BTTS and goal count

70%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
FramKA
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
FramKA
80%BTTS - last 540%
FramKA

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
FramKA
70%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
FramKA
45%Min. 3 goals before half-time35%
FramKA

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
FramKA
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
FramKA
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
FramKA

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fram is 106% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.85 pts / match - Fram · 0.9 pts / match - KA

Fram - half-time state
50% leading35% draw15% trailing
KA - half-time state
20% leading30% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.85Points per match (1st half)0.9
FramKA
1.45Goals scored (1st half)0.65
FramKA
0.9Goals conceded (1st half)1.2
FramKA
2.35Average goals (1st half)1.85
FramKA
45%Clean sheet before half-time35%
FramKA
30%No goal before half-time60%
FramKA

After half-time (2nd half)

1.35Points per match (2nd half)1.25
FramKA
1.15Goals scored (2nd half)0.9
FramKA
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.05
FramKA
2.15Average goals (2nd half)1.95
FramKA
35%Clean sheet after half-time35%
FramKA
35%No goal after half-time35%
FramKA

Fram - second-half results

35% W30% D35% L
37
Half-time points
29
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding130%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KA - second-half results

30% W35% D35% L
18
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fram - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.80
Goals scored / match1.80.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match2.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+4-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 9
KA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match1.61.0
Average goals in match2.61.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Fram
ScoredConceded
9
9
0-15
8
2
16-30
12
7
31-45
8
8
46-60
7
6
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

KA
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
5
6
16-30
4
11
31-45
3
5
46-60
6
7
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.15
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.4 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Fram

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

KA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

FramLigaKA
Average goals in match▲ 4.503.93▼ 3.80
Both teams scored▲ 75%70%▼ 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 75%69%▼ 65%
Clean sheets▼ 15%17%▼ 15%
Goal before half-time▼ 75%82%▼ 75%
Goal after half-time▲ 90%86%• 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.93
Average goals per match
70%
Both teams scored
69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
17%
Clean sheets
2.12
Home goals / match
1.80
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
15%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
40%
3 goals
17%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Fram 1 - 0 - 2 KA. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.

KA
3 : 4
Fram
KA Akureyri
2 : 0
Fram Reykjavík
Fram Reykjavík
1 : 2
KA Akureyri

FAQ

What was the result of Fram vs KA?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished Fram 2:2 KA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Fram and KA?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Fram won 1, KA won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Fram vs KA?

Fram score 2.60 goals per game on average and KA 1.55. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Fram's matches and 65% of KA's.

What form are Fram and KA in?

Over the last 5 games Fram have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and KA 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fram vs KA?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.