Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildLaugardalsvöllurData current as of 20 September 2026

Fram vs KR: match statistics

Fram crest
Fram
2 : 5half-time 1:3
KR crest
KR

Fram vs KR: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Fram played KR in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 10 August 2026. Venue: Laugardalsvöllur. Final score: 2:5.

Current form

Fram: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. KR: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Fram scores 2.53 and concedes 1.71 goals per match. KR scores 3.47 and concedes 2.18. League average: 3.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Fram 71%, KR 88%. Over 2.5: Fram 71%, KR 88%. League level: BTTS 70%, Over 2.5 69%.

xG, shots and style

KR has higher xG: 2.58 vs 1.97. Fram: 17.3 shots per match, KR: 22.5.

Match halves

Fram: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 1.24. KR: half-time lead 59%, second-half goals 1.71.

Goals by minute

Fram: 31-45+ (8 goals). KR: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Úrvalsdeild: 3.84 goals per match, BTTS 70%, Over 2.5 69%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Fram sit second in the table and remain unbeaten in their last five matches, scoring 12 goals and conceding just 5 during that period, while KR have a run of 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 defeat. The hosts win 63% of their home matches, whereas KR win only 38% of their away games, with as many as 38% ending in defeat. KR do create more chances — averaging 21.63 shots, 8.5 shots on target and an xG of 2.50 compared with Fram’s 17.5 shots, 6.38 shots on target and xG of 2.05 — but they have failed to keep a single clean sheet away from home. Both defences concede heavily, with Fram averaging 2.00 goals conceded at home and KR 2.50 away, pointing to an open match with goals at both ends. The hosts’ stronger current form, their 17% conversion rate and a clear home advantage give Fram a narrow edge.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams very frequently feature in matches with goals at both ends: BTTS occurred in 89% of Fram’s games and 88% of KR’s matches, well above the league average of 72%. Fram kept a clean sheet in only 11% of matches, while KR did not keep a clean sheet at all; meanwhile, the home side averaged 4.11 goals and the visitors 2.75. Their attacking potential is further confirmed by high xG figures of 2.67 for Fram and 2.50 for KR, along with an average of 9.78 and 8.50 shots on target per match, respectively. Recent form also supports the BTTS - Yes scenario, as both teams recorded BTTS in 80% of their last five matches, while KR averaged 3.2 goals. Although Fram conceded just 1.0 goal per match across their last five fixtures, KR’s attacking strength and 16 goals scored during this period point to a goal for the visitors.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

This is shaping up to be a very open game: the average total goals in Fram matches is 4,11, compared with 2,75 in KR matches. Both teams have gone Over 1.5 goals in 100% of their league appearances, while Fram has also cleared the Over 2.5 and Over 3.5 lines in every match, with KR reaching these lines in 75% of cases. In their last five matches, Fram averaged 2,4 goals scored, while KR averaged as many as 3,2, conceding 1,0 and 1,8 goals respectively. The potential for chance creation is equally high, with average xG of 2,67 for Fram and 2,50 for KR, while both teams record more than 21 shots per match. The strongest signal is Over 1.5: the historical consistency of both sides and the projected 3,95 goals significantly reduce the risk of a very low-scoring outcome.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Fram are exceptionally strong at home: they have won 89% of their matches, average 4.11 goals scored, and remain unbeaten, while KR concede an average of 2.50 goals away from home. The strongest signal concerns the first half, as the hosts were leading in 7 of 9 matches, or 78%, while KR went into half-time trailing in as many as 50% of their away fixtures. Fram average 2.11 goals scored before the break and concede just 0.67, whereas the visitors concede 1.38 goals per match during this phase. Both teams create plenty of chances, as reflected by Fram’s xG of 2.67 and KR’s 2.50; however, the hosts’ superior finishing efficiency—18% compared with 13%—and their points advantage support the expectation that they will maintain their lead through to full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 3
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
FramKR
25Shots25
FramKR
5Shots on target13
FramKR
2.84xG2.95
FramKR
12Corners5
FramKR
128Dangerous attacks65
FramKR
5Fouls15
FramKR
0Cards0
FramKR

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.53Goals scored / match3.47
FramKR
1.71Goals conceded / match2.18
FramKR
46%Average possession62%
FramKR
5.76Shots on target / match9.12
FramKR

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

17.29Shots per match22.47
FramKR
5.76Shots on target9.12
FramKR
14.6%Shot conversion15.4%
FramKR
46%Possession62%
FramKR
1.97xG for2.58
FramKR
1.45xG against1.45
FramKR

Shooting quality

Fram: Counter-attackingKR: Dominant
FramKR
Accuracy (shots on target)33%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fram is 38% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Fram · 1.6 pts / match - KR

Fram
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
65% W24% D12% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-4-2
2.18 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.93Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
KR
LDWWD
Season result split
65% W18% D18% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-3-3
2.12 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-3
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 3.00Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KR is 37% better for: goals scored per match.

2.53 goals / match - Fram · 3.47 goals / match - KR

Fram is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.71 goals / match - Fram · 2.18 goals / match - KR

Fram scoring profile: very strong

Fram scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while KR keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 17 matches).

KR scoring profile: very strong

KR scores in 94% of matches (16 of 17 matches), while Fram keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 matches).

43Goals scored (season)59
FramKR
29Goals conceded (season)37
FramKR
4.24Average goals in match5.65
FramKR
12Goals scored (last 5)16
FramKR
5Goals conceded (last 5)9
FramKR

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal94%
FramKR
71%2 goals88%
FramKR
53%3 goals76%
FramKR
29%4 goals47%
FramKR

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal94%
FramKR
47%2 goals76%
FramKR
29%3 goals29%
FramKR
6%4 goals6%
FramKR

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

41%BTTS at half-time41%
FramKR
18%BTTS in both halves29%
FramKR
47%Scored in both halves76%
FramKR

BTTS and goal count

65%Min. 3 goals and BTTS82%
FramKR
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
FramKR
80%BTTS - last 580%
FramKR

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
FramKR
65%Min. 2 goals before half-time82%
FramKR
35%Min. 3 goals before half-time41%
FramKR

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
FramKR
59%Min. 2 goals after half-time82%
FramKR
41%Min. 3 goals after half-time65%
FramKR

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KR is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.82 pts / match - Fram · 1.94 pts / match - KR

Fram - half-time state
47% leading41% draw12% trailing
KR - half-time state
59% leading18% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.82Points per match (1st half)1.94
FramKR
1.29Goals scored (1st half)1.76
FramKR
0.76Goals conceded (1st half)1
FramKR
2.06Average goals (1st half)2.76
FramKR
53%Clean sheet before half-time47%
FramKR
35%No goal before half-time12%
FramKR

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)1.53
FramKR
1.24Goals scored (2nd half)1.71
FramKR
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)1.18
FramKR
2.18Average goals (2nd half)2.88
FramKR
35%Clean sheet after half-time24%
FramKR
35%No goal after half-time18%
FramKR

Fram - second-half results

35% W35% D29% L
31
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KR - second-half results

41% W29% D29% L
33
Half-time points
30
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at half-time in 59% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Fram - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+5+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7
KR - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.80
Goals scored / match1.41.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match2.42.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal0%20%
Goal difference+2+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Fram
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
7
1
16-30
8
6
31-45
8
6
46-60
5
5
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

KR
ScoredConceded
10
9
0-15
10
2
16-30
10
6
31-45
8
5
46-60
10
6
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.95
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.4 : 2.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
129%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
80%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
77%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Fram

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

KR

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.89
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.73
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
203%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

FramLigaKR
Average goals in match 4.243.84 5.65
Both teams scored 71%70% 88%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%69% 88%
Clean sheets 18%17% 6%
Goal before half-time 71%80% 100%
Goal after half-time 88%86% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.84
Average goals per match
70%
Both teams scored
69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
17%
Clean sheets
2.13
Home goals / match
1.71
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
12%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
40%
3 goals
19%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Fram 1 - 1 - 1 KR. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.

KR
2 : 2
Fram
Fram Reykjavík
0 : 1
KR Reykjavík
KR Reykjavík
2 : 3
Fram Reykjavík

FAQ

What was the result of Fram vs KR?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished Fram 2:5 KR. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Fram and KR?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Fram won 1, KR won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Fram vs KR?

Fram score 2.53 goals per game on average and KR 3.47. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Fram's matches and 88% of KR's.

What form are Fram and KR in?

Over the last 5 games Fram have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and KR 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fram vs KR?

The statistical background for Fram vs KR — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.