Fram vs Thór: match statistics
Fram vs Thór: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Fram played Thór in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 12 July 2026. Venue: Laugardalsvöllur. Final score: 6:1.
Current form
Fram: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Thór: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Fram scores 2.46 and concedes 1.92 goals per match. Thór scores 1.08 and concedes 2.69. League average: 4.00 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Fram 69%, Thór 62%. Over 2.5: Fram 69%, Thór 69%. League level: BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 71%.
xG, shots and style
Fram has higher xG: 1.94 vs 1.17. Fram: 16.5 shots per match, Thór: 10.4.
Match halves
Fram: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.31. Thór: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.69.
Goals by minute
Fram: 0-15 (7 goals). Thór: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Úrvalsdeild: 4.00 goals per match, BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 71%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Fram is the clear favorite: they sit 3rd in the table with 8 wins this season, while Thór are 12th with just 2 wins. The hosts average 3.0 goals per home game (32 goals this season), registering 15.83 shots and 6.17 on target per home match with a 19% conversion, whereas Thór away average only 0.83 goals with 9.83 shots and 2.83 on target (8% conversion). Fram produces 1.95 xG at home, while Thór have 1.11 xG on the road and concede as much as 2.45 xG per away match, indicating the hosts create significantly more clear-cut chances. In the last 5 matches Fram have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (2.0 pts/match), while Thór have 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses (0.4 pts/match); additionally Thór conceded 15 goals in their last 5 matches versus 12 conceded by Fram. Considering Fram’s superiority in shots on target (6.17 vs 2.83), better efficiency (19% vs 8%) and the visitors’ weaker defense (averaging 3.0 conceded goals away), I predict a Fram win, although I expect a high-scoring game.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics strongly support BTTS - Yes: 74% of league matches finish with both teams scoring, Fram has 71% BTTS this season and Thór 50%. In the last 5 games Fram had BTTS in 60% of cases (scoring 2.2 and conceding 2.4 on average), while Thór had BTTS in 100% (scoring 1.6 and conceding 3.0 on average), indicating both teams have recently been scoring and conceding. Season-wide Fram averages 1.29 goals for and 2.43 against with xG for Fram 1.22 and xG against 2.31, whereas Thór averages 0.83 goals for and 3.00 against with xG for Thór 1.11 and xG against 2.45 — both defenses show high vulnerability. Additionally, Fram has only 14% clean sheets, Thór 0% clean sheets, and matches over 2.5 goals occur in 71% and 67% of fixtures respectively, which favors goal exchange. Based on this I tip BTTS = Yes with a probability of 80% versus 20% No, because the high league BTTS rate (74%), low clean sheet percentages and recent form (Thór 100% BTTS in last 5) create a strong signal for both teams to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
In the last 5 matches Fram had an xG of 1.82 and scored 11 goals (2.2 avg), while Thór had an xG of 1.01 and scored 8 goals (1.6 avg); they conceded 2.4 and 3.0 goals respectively, yielding a combined average of 4.6 goals per meeting. Seasonal rates confirm a tendency for goals: Fram records Over 1.5 in 71% and Over 2.5 in 71%, Thór has Over 1.5 in 83% and Over 2.5 in 67%, and the league averages 4.0 goals per match with BTTS 74%. Based on combined xG = 1.82+1.01 = 2.83, a simple Poisson model gives about a 78% chance of Over 1.5 goals and ~54% for Over 2.5 goals, however historical Over 2.5 (on average ~69% for both teams) and the recent average of 4.6 goals increase the credibility of Over 2.5 to around 62%. As a result the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (~78%), Over 2.5 shows a clear edge (~62%), while Over 3.5 looks less likely (~43%). I recommend backing the Over line at 1.5 due to Fram’s high xG (1.82), frequent BTTS (71%/50%) and seasonal Over 2.5 rates above 67%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast HT/FT 1/1 because Fram has a 60% win rate in the last 5 matches and led at the break in 60% of games, averaging 2.0 points per match, whereas Thór has a 0% win rate in the last 5 and averages 0.4 points per match. Fram scores an average of 0.57 goals by half-time versus 0.17 for Thór and has scored 4 goals in the 0–15 minute window this season while Thór has 0 in that interval, which strongly signals an early lead for the home side. xG data show Fram generates 1.22 xG on average against Thór’s 1.11 xG, and both teams concede many chances (xG against: Fram 2.31, Thór 2.45), so I expect goals but the edge belongs to Fram. Fram has collected 8 points at half-time this season and averages 1.14 points per match at half-time, compared to Thór’s 1 point total and 0.17 points per match at half-time, increasing the likelihood that the home side will retain the lead until full-time. Fram concedes on average 1.0 goals by half-time and 1.43 after the break, so scenarios of 1/X and X/1 are realistic, but I assign the highest probability to 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Fram | Thór | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Fram is 400% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Fram · 0.4 pts / match - Thór
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fram is 128% better for: goals scored per match.
2.46 goals / match - Fram · 1.08 goals / match - Thór
Fram is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.92 goals / match - Fram · 2.69 goals / match - Thór
Fram scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Thór keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 matches).
Thór scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Fram keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fram
Over / Under - Thór
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fram is 135% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.62 pts / match - Fram · 0.69 pts / match - Thór
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fram - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Thór - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Fram
Thór
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| Fram | Liga | Thór | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.38 | 4.00 | ▼ 3.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 69% | 74% | ▼ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 69% | 71% | ▼ 69% |
| Clean sheets | • 15% | 14% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 84% | • 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 88% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Fram 0 - 0 - 1 Thór. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Fram vs Thór?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished Fram 6:1 Thór. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Fram vs Thór?
Fram score 2.46 goals per game on average and Thór 1.08. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Fram's matches and 62% of Thór's.
What form are Fram and Thór in?
Over the last 5 games Fram have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Thór 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fram vs Thór?
The statistical background for Fram vs Thór — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


