Latvia - VirsligaZemgales Olimpiskā centraData current as of 23 July 2026

FS Jelgava vs BFC Daugavpils: match statistics

FS Jelgava crest
FS Jelgava
1 : 1half-time 0:0
BFC Daugavpils crest
BFC Daugavpils

FS Jelgava vs BFC Daugavpils: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FS Jelgava play BFC Daugavpils in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 31 May 2026 at 15:00. Venue: Zemgales Olimpiskā centra. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

FS Jelgava: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. BFC Daugavpils: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

FS Jelgava scores 1.04 and concedes 1.70 goals per match. BFC Daugavpils scores 1.26 and concedes 1.26. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FS Jelgava 43%, BFC Daugavpils 57%. Over 2.5: FS Jelgava 39%, BFC Daugavpils 43%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

BFC Daugavpils has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.30. FS Jelgava: 10.6 shots per match, BFC Daugavpils: 12.7.

Match halves

FS Jelgava: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.43. BFC Daugavpils: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.87.

Goals by minute

FS Jelgava: 16-30 (5 goals). BFC Daugavpils: 46-60 (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

5 H2H matches: 1-1-3. Average goals 1.80, BTTS 20%.

Match description

I predict an away win (BFC Daugavpils) based on their superiority in finishing and goal return. The visitors score on average 1.5 goals away, while the hosts average only 0.86 goals at home and fail to score in 43% of home matches, which weakens their offensive prospects. Daugavpils has a better shot conversion 14% versus Jelgava’s 8% and registers 4.17 shots on target per away game, while their average xG away is 1.31 versus Jelgava’s xG 1.27, confirming that the visitors create comparable or slightly more high-quality chances. Both defenses are vulnerable—Jelgava concedes 2.14 goals at home and Daugavpils 2.33 away—so I expect an open game with goals at both ends. Although Jelgava has better recent form over the last 5 matches (1.2 pts per game versus 0.6 pts for the visitors), the season goal differential 18 vs 11 and the fact that the visitors have 0% of matches without a goal (FTS 0% vs 43%) lead me to favor Daugavpils.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

41Possession (%)59
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
11Shots22
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
6Shots on target5
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
1.46xG2.05
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
11Corners7
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
47Dangerous attacks43
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
11Fouls7
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
1Cards0
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
1.04Goals scored / match1.26
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
1.7Goals conceded / match1.26
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
43%Average possession47%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
3.48Shots on target / match4.78
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.61Shots per match12.74
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
3.48Shots on target4.78
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
9.8%Shot conversion9.9%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
43%Possession47%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
1.3xG for1.54
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
1.73xG against1.61
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils

Shooting quality

FS Jelgava: BalancedBFC Daugavpils: Balanced
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
Accuracy (shots on target)33%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

BFC Daugavpils is 11% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - FS Jelgava · 2 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils

FS Jelgava
WWWLL
Season result split
26% W30% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-10
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-6
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
BFC Daugavpils
WDLWW
Season result split
35% W26% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-9
1.30 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

BFC Daugavpils is 21% better for: goals scored per match.

1.04 goals / match - FS Jelgava · 1.26 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils

BFC Daugavpils is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.7 goals / match - FS Jelgava · 1.26 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils

FS Jelgava scoring profile: strong

FS Jelgava scores in 57% of matches (13 of 23 matches), while BFC Daugavpils keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 matches).

BFC Daugavpils scoring profile: very strong

BFC Daugavpils scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).

24Goals scored (season)29
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
39Goals conceded (season)29
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
2.74Average goals in match2.52
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
11Goals scored (last 5)9
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal74%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
26%2 goals30%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
9%3 goals17%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
9%4 goals4%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal74%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
30%2 goals26%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
22%3 goals17%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
13%4 goals9%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time4%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
0%BTTS in both halves0%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
17%Scored in both halves22%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils

BTTS and goal count

22%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
40%BTTS - last 540%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time52%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time30%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FS Jelgava is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / match - FS Jelgava · 1.3 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils

FS Jelgava - half-time state
39% leading26% draw35% trailing
BFC Daugavpils - half-time state
26% leading52% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)1.3
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.39
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
0.61Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
1.22Average goals (1st half)0.7
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
52%Clean sheet before half-time74%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
57%No goal before half-time70%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.13
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
1.09Goals conceded (2nd half)0.96
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
1.52Average goals (2nd half)1.83
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
39%Clean sheet after half-time30%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils
70%No goal after half-time35%
FS JelgavaBFC Daugavpils

FS Jelgava - second-half results

26% W22% R52% P
33
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 26%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

BFC Daugavpils - second-half results

22% W48% R30% P
30
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FS Jelgava - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
BFC Daugavpils - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.62.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FS Jelgava
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
5
6
16-30
5
3
31-45
1
6
46-60
5
6
61-75
4
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

BFC Daugavpils
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
5
3
31-45
13
10
46-60
3
4
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FS Jelgava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.71
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

BFC Daugavpils

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

FS JelgavaLigaBFC Daugavpils
Average goals in match 2.742.98 2.52
Both teams scored 43%56% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%55% 43%
Clean sheets 17%24% 26%
Goal before half-time 78%75% 52%
Goal after half-time 83%84% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): FS Jelgava 1 - 1 - 3 BFC Daugavpils. Average goals 1.80, both teams scored in 20% matches.

BFC Daugavpils
1 : 0
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
0 : 0
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
2 : 0
FS Jelgava
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
1 : 0
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
4 : 1
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils

FAQ

What was the result of FS Jelgava vs BFC Daugavpils?

The Virsliga match finished FS Jelgava 1:1 BFC Daugavpils. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FS Jelgava and BFC Daugavpils?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches FS Jelgava won 1, BFC Daugavpils won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FS Jelgava vs BFC Daugavpils?

FS Jelgava score 1.04 goals per game on average and BFC Daugavpils 1.26. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 43% of FS Jelgava's matches and 57% of BFC Daugavpils's.

What form are FS Jelgava and BFC Daugavpils in?

Over the last 5 games FS Jelgava have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and BFC Daugavpils 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FS Jelgava vs BFC Daugavpils?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.