Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 23 July 2026

FS Jelgava vs Super Nova: match statistics

FS Jelgava crest
FS Jelgava
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Super Nova crest
Super Nova

FS Jelgava vs Super Nova: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FS Jelgava play Super Nova in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 6 May 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

FS Jelgava: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Super Nova: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

FS Jelgava scores 1.04 and concedes 1.70 goals per match. Super Nova scores 1.09 and concedes 1.52. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FS Jelgava 43%, Super Nova 61%. Over 2.5: FS Jelgava 39%, Super Nova 57%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

FS Jelgava has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.19. FS Jelgava: 10.6 shots per match, Super Nova: 9.0.

Match halves

FS Jelgava: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.43. Super Nova: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.52.

Goals by minute

FS Jelgava: 16-30 (5 goals). Super Nova: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

6 H2H matches: 3-3-0. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 67%.

Match description

Super Nova is the clear statistical favorite: they sit 5th and have 67% wins away with an average of 1.17 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per match, while FS Jelgava are 9th with only 20% home wins. Visitors average 3.33 shots on target and have a 14% conversion rate; hosts average 2.8 SoT with a 10% conversion. Additionally, Jelgava fail to score in 60% of home games versus 17% of Super Nova’s away matches. xG is nearly identical (1.12 vs 1.13), but Jelgava’s defense looks worse — average xG against 1.65 and actually 2.8 goals conceded at home versus 1.44 xG against and 1.0 goals conceded for the visitors. Both teams have conceded 10 goals in the last 5 matches, but Super Nova have 33% clean sheets away vs 0% for Jelgava at home and superior finishing, which gives them the edge. Considering these figures, I predict an away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
13Shots7
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
4Shots on target2
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
1.55xG0.9
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
7Corners4
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
63Dangerous attacks44
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
15Fouls17
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
3Cards1
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FS JelgavaSuper Nova
1.04Goals scored / match1.09
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
1.7Goals conceded / match1.52
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
43%Average possession45%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
3.48Shots on target / match3.61
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.61Shots per match9.04
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
3.48Shots on target3.61
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
9.8%Shot conversion12%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
43%Possession45%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
1.3xG for1.19
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
1.73xG against1.68
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

Shooting quality

FS Jelgava: BalancedSuper Nova: Counter-attacking
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
Accuracy (shots on target)33%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FS Jelgava is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - FS Jelgava · 1.2 pts / match - Super Nova

FS Jelgava
WWWLL
Season result split
26% W30% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-10
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-6
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Super Nova
LLWLW
Season result split
35% W13% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-12
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-1-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Super Nova is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.04 goals / match - FS Jelgava · 1.09 goals / match - Super Nova

Super Nova is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.7 goals / match - FS Jelgava · 1.52 goals / match - Super Nova

FS Jelgava scoring profile: strong

FS Jelgava scores in 57% of matches (13 of 23 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).

Super Nova scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).

24Goals scored (season)25
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
39Goals conceded (season)35
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
2.74Average goals in match2.61
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
11Goals scored (last 5)6
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
6Goals conceded (last 5)10
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal78%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
26%2 goals26%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
9%3 goals4%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
9%4 goals0%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal78%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
30%2 goals48%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
22%3 goals13%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
13%4 goals9%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time30%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
0%BTTS in both halves0%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
17%Scored in both halves9%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

BTTS and goal count

22%Min. 3 goals and BTTS52%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
40%BTTS - last 560%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time48%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FS Jelgava is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / match - FS Jelgava · 1.04 pts / match - Super Nova

FS Jelgava - half-time state
39% leading26% draw35% trailing
Super Nova - half-time state
17% leading52% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)1.04
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.57
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
0.61Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
1.22Average goals (1st half)1.39
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
52%Clean sheet before half-time52%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
57%No goal before half-time57%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.22
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.52
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
1.09Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
1.52Average goals (2nd half)1.22
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
39%Clean sheet after half-time48%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
70%No goal after half-time57%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

FS Jelgava - second-half results

26% W22% R52% P
33
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 26%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Super Nova - second-half results

35% W17% R48% P
24
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding206%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FS Jelgava - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Super Nova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FS Jelgava
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
5
6
16-30
5
3
31-45
1
6
46-60
5
6
61-75
4
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
12
31-45
4
6
46-60
1
3
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FS Jelgava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.71
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

FS JelgavaLigaSuper Nova
Average goals in match 2.742.98 2.61
Both teams scored 43%56% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%55% 57%
Clean sheets 17%24% 22%
Goal before half-time 78%75% 61%
Goal after half-time 83%84% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): FS Jelgava 3 - 3 - 0 Super Nova. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Super Nova
1 : 5
FS Jelgava
Super Nova
1 : 1
FS Jelgava
SK Super Nova
1 : 1
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
1 : 0
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
0 : 0
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
2 : 1
SK Super Nova

FAQ

What was the result of FS Jelgava vs Super Nova?

The Virsliga match finished FS Jelgava 1:0 Super Nova. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FS Jelgava and Super Nova?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches FS Jelgava won 3, Super Nova won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FS Jelgava vs Super Nova?

FS Jelgava score 1.04 goals per game on average and Super Nova 1.09. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 43% of FS Jelgava's matches and 61% of Super Nova's.

What form are FS Jelgava and Super Nova in?

Over the last 5 games FS Jelgava have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Super Nova 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FS Jelgava vs Super Nova?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.