Geylang International vs Tanjong Pagar: match statistics
Geylang International vs Tanjong Pagar: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Geylang International played Tanjong Pagar in S.League (Singapore). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Geylang International: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Tanjong Pagar: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Geylang International scores 1.13 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Tanjong Pagar scores 0.81 and concedes 3.00. League average: 3.59 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Geylang International 47%, Tanjong Pagar 50%. Over 2.5: Geylang International 53%, Tanjong Pagar 81%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 73%.
xG, shots and style
Geylang International has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.18. Geylang International: 11.9 shots per match, Tanjong Pagar: 9.9.
Match halves
Geylang International: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.53. Tanjong Pagar: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.56.
Goals by minute
Geylang International: 61-75 (5 goals). Tanjong Pagar: 61-75 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
S.League: 3.59 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 73%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The home side, Geylang International, are clear favorites — they sit 5th with 6 wins this season, while Tanjong Pagar are 8th with just 1 victory. Over the last 5 matches Geylang have scored 5 goals and recorded a form line of 2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses, averaging 1.4 points per game; Tanjong Pagar have managed only 1 goal, lost all 5 and have 0 points in that period. The decisive advantage for the hosts is defensive: Geylang concede 1.71 goals per home match on average (25 conceded this season) and have 14% clean sheets at home, whereas Tanjong Pagar concede 2.86 goals away (48 conceded this season) and have 0% clean sheets. In attack xG is similar — 1.21 home xG for Geylang versus 1.19 away xG for Tanjong, and both average 0.86 goals scored — however xG against of 1.37 versus 2.5 indicates a substantially higher defensive vulnerability for the visitors. On that basis I tip a home win; estimated probabilities: Geylang win 70%, draw 18%, Tanjong Pagar win 12%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis supports BTTS - Yes: Geylang concedes an average of 3.11 goals per match, Tanjong Pagar concedes 2.86 goals per match, and both teams have 0% clean sheets this season, which strongly increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Season BTTS rates are 33% for Geylang and 71% for Tanjong, with the league BTTS average at 52%, suggesting a tilt toward a both-teams-to-score scenario. The league environment is high-scoring — league average goals is 3.58, and the over 2.5 rate is 78% for Geylang and 86% for Tanjong; additionally, 33% of Geylang’s matches and 56% of Tanjong’s matches combine over 2.5 with BTTS. A counterpoint is Tanjong’s poor attacking form: only 1 goal in the last 5 matches (0.2 per match) and 20% BTTS in the last five, which lowers confidence that they will score. Even so, Geylang’s last 5 show average xG 1.3 and goals scored 1.0 per match, while Tanjong has conceded an average 2.44 xG and 2.8 goals in that period, so I expect both sides to find the net — therefore I assign higher weight to BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Averaging the teams' offensive xG and the opponent's xG conceded yields a high goals projection: Geylang has xG 1.16 and Tanjong concedes 2.50 xG — the average of these values is 1.83 expected goals for the home side. Similarly, Tanjong has xG 1.19 while Geylang concedes 2.42 xG — the average is 1.81 for the away side, totaling 3.64 goals. Seasonal metrics reinforce pressure toward the over: Over 1.5 occurred in 89% of Geylang’s matches and 100% of Tanjong’s, while Over 2.5 appeared in 78% and 86% of their games respectively. Additionally, both teams concede many goals (Geylang 25 conceded, Tanjong 48), the league average is 3.58 goals per match, and average shots are around 9.8 and 10 with shot-on-target figures of 3.22 and 3.14, indicating numerous chances. As a result, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 — the historical 89%/100% and the projected 3.64 goals provide a high safety margin, although Over 2.5 is also materially likely (approximately 78–86% historically).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Both teams have serious defensive issues: Geylang concedes an average of 3.11 goals per match, Tanjong Pagar 2.86, and the xG against is 2.42 versus 2.50, indicating high susceptibility to conceding. At half-time the teams typically score very little — average goals scored by half are 0.22 for the home side and 0.29 for the visitors, although in the last five matches Geylang averages 0.8 goals by the break compared to Tanjong’s 0.2. Most goals arrive after the break: average second-half goals are 2.11 in Geylang’s matches and 2.00 in Tanjong’s, and the percentage of matches with at least one goal after half-time is 78% and 86% respectively. Form favors the hosts — Geylang’s last five are l d l w w and they average 1.4 points per match in that period, while Tanjong’s last five are l l l l l with 0.0 points per match, so the strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a Geylang win at full-time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Geylang International | Tanjong Pagar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Geylang International is 40% better for: goals scored per match.
1.13 goals / match - Geylang International · 0.81 goals / match - Tanjong Pagar
Geylang International is 80% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.67 goals / match - Geylang International · 3 goals / match - Tanjong Pagar
Geylang International scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Tanjong Pagar keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 16 matches).
Tanjong Pagar scores in 50% of matches (8 of 16 matches), while Geylang International keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Geylang International
Over / Under - Tanjong Pagar
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Geylang International is 216% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / match - Geylang International · 0.38 pts / match - Tanjong Pagar
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Geylang International - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Tanjong Pagar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 6%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -8 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Geylang International
Tanjong Pagar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (S.League).
Teams vs league
| Geylang International | Liga | Tanjong Pagar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.80 | 3.59 | ▲ 3.81 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 51% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 53% | 73% | ▲ 81% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 27% | 25% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 73% | 86% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 86% | ▼ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Geylang International 2 - 0 - 0 Tanjong Pagar. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Geylang International vs Tanjong Pagar?
The S.League match finished Geylang International 2:1 Tanjong Pagar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Geylang International and Tanjong Pagar?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Geylang International won 2, Tanjong Pagar won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Geylang International vs Tanjong Pagar?
Geylang International score 1.13 goals per game on average and Tanjong Pagar 0.81. The S.League average is 3.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Geylang International's matches and 50% of Tanjong Pagar's.
What form are Geylang International and Tanjong Pagar in?
Over the last 5 games Geylang International have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Tanjong Pagar 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Geylang International vs Tanjong Pagar?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


