Gillingham vs Accrington Stanley: match statistics
Gillingham vs Accrington Stanley: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Gillingham played Accrington Stanley in EFL League Two (England). The match was played on 6 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Gillingham: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Accrington Stanley: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Gillingham scores 1.15 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Accrington Stanley scores 1.00 and concedes 1.10. League average: 2.53 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Gillingham 55%, Accrington Stanley 38%. Over 2.5: Gillingham 45%, Accrington Stanley 30%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
Gillingham has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.36. Gillingham: 13.3 shots per match, Accrington Stanley: 12.1.
Match halves
Gillingham: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.78. Accrington Stanley: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.53.
Goals by minute
Gillingham: 76-90+ (14 goals). Accrington Stanley: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League Two: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Gillingham create clearly better chances at home – average xG 1.71 and 5.35 shots on target per home match, versus 1.27 xG and 3.74 shots on target for Accrington away. Gillingham average 1.25 goals per home game, while Accrington only 0.89 away; additionally the hosts fail to score in only 15% of home matches, whereas the visitors are goalless in 47% of their away fixtures. Defensively the visitors have the edge – Accrington concede 1.16 goals per away match and register 32% clean sheets, while Gillingham concede 1.6 at home and have just 15% clean sheets. Form over the last five matches favors Accrington in points: Gillingham have scored 3 goals, have no wins and average 0.2 points per match, while Accrington have 2 goals, 1 win and average 0.8 points per match. Considering the home advantage in chance quality (xG 1.71 vs 1.27 and 5.35 vs 3.74) and the high share of Accrington away games without a goal (47%), I forecast a Gillingham win, though the risk of a draw remains significant given the visitors’ more resilient defense.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal statistics indicate a low likelihood of BTTS: Gillingham have BTTS in 38% of matches, Accrington in 37%, while the league average is 51%. In the last 5 matches the signal is even weaker — Gillingham have BTTS in 40% of those games, Accrington 0%, with average goals scored 0.6 and 0.4 respectively. Although xG shows some chances (xG for Gillingham 1.44 vs xG for Accrington 1.27), both teams also concede opponent xG of 1.32 and 1.51, and Gillingham have scored 46 and conceded 60 this season, while Accrington have scored 40 and conceded 44. The low frequency of matches over 2.5 goals (29% and 32%) and clean sheets in 29% and 32% of games further support a scenario where at least one team keeps a clean sheet, therefore I tip BTTS - No with a 70% probability versus 30% for Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and defensive metrics indicate combined expected goals around 2.78: home ~1.48 (xG 1.44 vs xG conceded to visitors 1.51), away ~1.30 (xG 1.27 vs xG conceded to hosts 1.32). Season-long rates show Over 1.5 goals occurs frequently — 62% of Gillingham matches and 63% of Accrington matches finish over 1.5, with a league average of 2.53 goals per game. Additionally, Gillingham have conceded 13 goals in the last 5 fixtures (2.6 per game), increasing the likelihood of further goals; hosts average 4.33 shots on target, visitors 3.74 with an 8% conversion rate. Consequently the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (est. 77%), Over 2.5 has moderate probability (~53%), and Over 3.5 is less likely (~31%), hence the recommendation to play the Over line at 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Gillingham has a statistical home advantage: the hosts have won 43% of home matches and led at the break in 9 games (43%), while Accrington have won only 26% of away matches and led at the break in 5 games (26%). Gillingham creates more opportunities: average xG is 1.44 versus 1.27 for Accrington, they average 13.05 shots (vs 11.05) and 4.33 shots on target (vs 3.74), which increases the chances of taking a lead in the first half. This is confirmed by half-time stats: the hosts score an average of 0.52 goals before the break and concede 0.38 on average (19 total first-half goals), so the first-half advantage is shown numerically. However, there is a risk of a turnaround by the visitors, because Accrington concede an average of 1.51 expected goals (xG against 1.51) and the hosts have been poor in recent results (0% wins in the last 5 matches), which gives a real chance of being pegged back after the break. Considering the hosts’ first-half advantage (43% leads) and higher xG and shot volume, the strongest HT/FT scenario is 1/1 (hosts lead at the break and win), which I assign a 34% probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Gillingham | Accrington Stanley | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Accrington Stanley is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Gillingham · 0.8 pts / match - Accrington Stanley
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gillingham is 15% better for: goals scored per match.
1.15 goals / match - Gillingham · 1 goals / match - Accrington Stanley
Accrington Stanley is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Gillingham · 1.1 goals / match - Accrington Stanley
Gillingham scores in 73% of matches (29 of 40 matches), while Accrington Stanley keeps a clean sheet in 30% (12 of 40 matches).
Accrington Stanley scores in 60% of matches (24 of 40 matches), while Gillingham keeps a clean sheet in 20% (8 of 40 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gillingham
Over / Under - Accrington Stanley
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Accrington Stanley is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.02 pts / match - Gillingham · 1.43 pts / match - Accrington Stanley
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gillingham - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Accrington Stanley - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Gillingham
Accrington Stanley
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Gillingham | Liga | Accrington Stanley | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.65 | 2.53 | ▼ 2.10 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 55% | 51% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 45% | 46% | ▼ 30% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 27% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 55% | 66% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 78% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Gillingham 0 - 1 - 0 Accrington Stanley. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Gillingham vs Accrington Stanley?
The EFL League Two match finished Gillingham 2:0 Accrington Stanley. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Gillingham vs Accrington Stanley?
Gillingham score 1.15 goals per game on average and Accrington Stanley 1.00. The EFL League Two average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Gillingham's matches and 38% of Accrington Stanley's.
What form are Gillingham and Accrington Stanley in?
Over the last 5 games Gillingham have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Accrington Stanley 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gillingham vs Accrington Stanley?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


