South Korea - K League 2Gimpo StadiumData current as of 07 September 2026

Gimpo Citizen vs Yongin City: match statistics

Gimpo Citizen crest
Gimpo Citizen
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Yongin City crest
Yongin City

Gimpo Citizen vs Yongin City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Gimpo Citizen played Yongin City in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 26 July 2026. Venue: Gimpo Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Gimpo Citizen: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Yongin City: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Gimpo Citizen scores 1.18 and concedes 1.12 goals per match. Yongin City scores 1.18 and concedes 1.53. League average: 2.80 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Gimpo Citizen 53%, Yongin City 65%. Over 2.5: Gimpo Citizen 35%, Yongin City 59%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Gimpo Citizen has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.15. Gimpo Citizen: 12.3 shots per match, Yongin City: 8.6.

Match halves

Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.65. Yongin City: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (8 goals). Yongin City: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I expect a draw because both teams show similar form and numbers: in the last 5 matches each averages 1 point and has conceded 8 goals. Gimpo generates significantly more chances at home (avg xG 1.95, 16.33 shots and 4.33 on target per match) compared to Yongin (xG 1.26, 10 shots and 3.43 on target), but the hosts convert only 6% of attempts and score an average of 1.00 goal at home. Yongin is more efficient with fewer attempts (11% conversion and 1.14 goals on average away) and concedes fewer goals on the road (1.43 vs 1.67 for the hosts), which offsets Gimpo’s chance-creation advantage. Additionally, Gimpo has a high share of home draws (67%) and 0% clean sheets, while Yongin has 29% clean sheets away and only 29% of matches without scoring, suggesting a higher probability of a low-scoring split of points. Considering these figures and the average total goals (2.67 hosts vs 2.57 away), a draw is the most likely outcome, with a moderate chance of a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The 'Both Teams To Score' scenario is more likely: Gimpo has a season BTTS of 70%, Yongin 57%, and the league shows 61% of matches with both teams scoring. Both teams have weak defensive records: Gimpo concedes 1.6 goals per game on average and has only a 10% clean sheet rate, Yongin concedes 1.43 goals per game and has a 29% clean sheet rate. In the last 5 matches Gimpo generated xG 1.69 and scored 5 goals, Yongin had xG 0.94 and scored 4 goals, but both sides conceded 8 goals in those five fixtures. Shot stats show Yongin averages 10.0 shots (3.43 on target) versus Gimpo 7.6 (3.1 on target), and with conversion rates of 11% for Yongin and 16% for Gimpo both teams have realistic scoring opportunities; additionally more than half of both teams' matches are over 2.5 goals (60% and 57%). Considering the 70%/57% season BTTS, the league 61% baseline, low clean sheets of 10% and 29%, and the recent 8 goals conceded by each team, I estimate 70% for BTTS - Yes and 30% for BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Statistical analysis favors the Over side, especially the 1.5 line: Gimpo has 80% of its matches over 1.5 goals, Yongin 71% (avg. 75.5%), providing a strong seasonal signal for Over 1.5. Based on xG: hosts have xG_for = 1.08, visitors xG_for = 1.26, with xG_against 1.57 (Gimpo) and 1.33 (Yongin); the mean of these values yields expected goals of 1.21 for Gimpo and 1.42 for Yongin, totaling 2.63. The total expected 2.63 is well above the 1.5 threshold and slightly above 2.5; seasonal Over 2.5 rates are 60% for Gimpo and 57% for Yongin (avg. ~58.5%), so Over 2.5 is possible but less certain than Over 1.5. Additionally, a high rate of BTTS (70% Gimpo and 57% Yongin) and a low home clean sheet rate (10%) increase the likelihood of goals from both sides. In practice the strongest and best signal is Over 1.5 (pick); Over 2.5 is moderately likely (~60%), while Over 3.5 is rather unlikely (~32%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is a draw at half-time: the visitors were level at the break in 71% of their matches, while the hosts were level at half-time in 40%, which significantly increases the probability of a draw after 45 minutes. After the break Yongin have the greater chances — they have 29% wins this season versus only 10% for Gimpo, and xG shows an advantage for the visitors 1.26 vs 1.08 with xG conceded by the hosts 1.57 compared to 1.33 for the visitors. I expect few goals by half-time: the hosts average 0.6 goals by the break, the visitors 0.29, and average HT totals are 1.3 (hosts) vs 0.57 (visitors). Second-half statistics suggest a decision after the break — the visitors score on average 0.86 goals in the second half and their second halves average 2.0 goals, while the hosts have 0.6 scored and 1.5 on average, which favors a comeback and a win for the visitors after 90 minutes. Therefore my most confident selection is draw at half-time and visitors to win full-time (X/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
18Shots10
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
5Shots on target3
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
1.87xG1.1
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
8Corners5
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
53Dangerous attacks35
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
12Fouls15
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
3Cards3
Gimpo CitizenYongin City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Gimpo CitizenYongin City
1.18Goals scored / match1.18
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
1.12Goals conceded / match1.53
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
50%Average possession49%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
4Shots on target / match3.24
Gimpo CitizenYongin City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.29Shots per match8.59
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
4Shots on target3.24
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
9.6%Shot conversion13.7%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
50%Possession49%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
1.52xG for1.15
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
1.27xG against1.47
Gimpo CitizenYongin City

Shooting quality

Gimpo Citizen: BalancedYongin City: Efficient finishing
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
Accuracy (shots on target)33%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Yongin City is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1.2 pts / match - Yongin City

Gimpo Citizen
WDLLD
Season result split
35% W41% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-4
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 at home
0-2-1
DLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Yongin City
DDWDL
Season result split
18% W47% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gimpo Citizen is 37% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.12 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1.53 goals / match - Yongin City

Gimpo Citizen scoring profile: very strong

Gimpo Citizen scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Yongin City keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 matches).

Yongin City scoring profile: strong

Yongin City scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

20Goals scored (season)20
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
19Goals conceded (season)26
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
2.29Average goals in match2.71
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
Gimpo CitizenYongin City

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal71%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
29%2 goals35%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
12%3 goals6%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
0%4 goals6%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal82%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
35%2 goals53%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
6%3 goals18%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
0%4 goals0%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time18%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
6%BTTS in both halves6%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
24%Scored in both halves29%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
60%BTTS - last 560%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
18%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Gimpo Citizen is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1.06 pts / match - Yongin City

Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
24% leading53% draw24% trailing
Yongin City - half-time state
18% leading53% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1.06
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.47
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
1.06Average goals (1st half)1
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
47%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
59%No goal before half-time65%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.59Points per match (2nd half)0.94
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
1.24Average goals (2nd half)1.71
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
59%Clean sheet after half-time35%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City
41%No goal after half-time35%
Gimpo CitizenYongin City

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

47% W18% R35% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Yongin City - second-half results

18% W41% R41% P
18
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gimpo Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Yongin City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.60
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Yongin City
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
5
5
31-45
2
7
46-60
1
5
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+60%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

Yongin City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
45% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
45%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Gimpo CitizenLigaYongin City
Average goals in match 2.292.80 2.71
Both teams scored 53%63% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%56% 59%
Clean sheets 29%23% 18%
Goal before half-time 65%73% 59%
Goal after half-time 88%77% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.80
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardTae-Han Kim
  2. Yongin CitySubstitutionOn: Jong-Seok KimOff: Young-Jun Choi
  3. Yongin CityYellow cardHan-Gil Kim
  4. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Min-Sik KimOff: Bu-Seong Jang
  5. Yongin CityYellow cardJong-Seok Kim
  6. Yongin CityGoalChi-Ung ChoiAssist: Bo-Seob Kim
  7. Gimpo CitizenGoalLuan Dias da SilvaAssist: Chang-Seok Lim
  8. Yongin CityYellow cardBo-Seob Kim
  9. Yongin CitySubstitutionOn: Cho Hyun-wooOff: Han-Gil Kim
  10. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardDong-Min Kim

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Gimpo Citizen 1 - 0 - 0 Yongin City. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Gimpo Citizen vs Yongin City?

The K League 2 match finished Gimpo Citizen 1:1 Yongin City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Gimpo Citizen vs Yongin City?

Gimpo Citizen score 1.18 goals per game on average and Yongin City 1.18. The K League 2 average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Gimpo Citizen's matches and 65% of Yongin City's.

What form are Gimpo Citizen and Yongin City in?

Over the last 5 games Gimpo Citizen have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Yongin City 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gimpo Citizen vs Yongin City?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.