Grasshopper vs Lugano: match statistics
Lugano demonstrates significantly better form and statistics than Grasshopper. The visitors occupy 3rd place in the table with 13 wins this season, while the hosts are in 11th place with just 4 wins and a record of 13 defeats. Grasshopper wins only 15% of their home games and concedes an average of 1.62 goals per match, which, coupled with their poor form (1 point per game in their last 5 matches), puts them at a disadvantage. Lugano wins 38% of their away matches, boasts a better average ball possession (59% vs 47%), and has more favorable xG statistics (1.66 vs 1.46). The visitors' recent form (1.4 points per game, a run of 4 draws and a win) and their advantage in most statistical parameters point towards their victory, although solid defense and the possibility of a draw is also realistic given Lugano's recent stabilization in form.
Grasshopper vs Lugano: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Grasshopper played Lugano in Super League (Switzerland). The match was played on 1 March 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Grasshopper: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Lugano: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Grasshopper scores 1.31 and concedes 1.81 goals per match. Lugano scores 1.65 and concedes 1.19. League average: 3.31 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Grasshopper 65%, Lugano 65%. Over 2.5: Grasshopper 54%, Lugano 50%. League level: BTTS 68%, Over 2.5 67%.
xG, shots and style
Lugano has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.45. Grasshopper: 12.8 shots per match, Lugano: 13.3.
Match halves
Grasshopper: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.73. Lugano: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.81.
Goals by minute
Grasshopper: 76-90+ (9 goals). Lugano: 61-75 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super League: 3.31 goals per match, BTTS 68%, Over 2.5 67%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Lugano demonstrates significantly better form and statistics than Grasshopper. The visitors occupy 3rd place in the table with 13 wins this season, while the hosts are in 11th place with just 4 wins and a record of 13 defeats. Grasshopper wins only 15% of their home games and concedes an average of 1.62 goals per match, which, coupled with their poor form (1 point per game in their last 5 matches), puts them at a disadvantage. Lugano wins 38% of their away matches, boasts a better average ball possession (59% vs 47%), and has more favorable xG statistics (1.66 vs 1.46). The visitors' recent form (1.4 points per game, a run of 4 draws and a win) and their advantage in most statistical parameters point towards their victory, although solid defense and the possibility of a draw is also realistic given Lugano's recent stabilization in form.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Grasshopper | Lugano | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Lugano is 133% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Grasshopper · 1.4 pts / match - Lugano
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lugano is 26% better for: goals scored per match.
1.31 goals / match - Grasshopper · 1.65 goals / match - Lugano
Lugano is 52% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.81 goals / match - Grasshopper · 1.19 goals / match - Lugano
Grasshopper scores in 73% of matches (19 of 26 matches), while Lugano keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 matches).
Lugano scores in 88% of matches (23 of 26 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Grasshopper
Over / Under - Lugano
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lugano is 51% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.12 pts / match - Grasshopper · 1.69 pts / match - Lugano
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Grasshopper - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 15%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Lugano - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Grasshopper
Lugano
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Grasshopper | Liga | Lugano | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.12 | 3.31 | ▼ 2.85 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 65% | 68% | ▼ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 54% | 67% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 12% | 19% | ▲ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 73% | 77% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | • 81% | 82% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Grasshopper 0 - 1 - 1 Lugano. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Grasshopper vs Lugano?
The Super League match finished Grasshopper 1:0 Lugano. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Grasshopper and Lugano?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Grasshopper won 0, Lugano won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Grasshopper vs Lugano?
Grasshopper score 1.31 goals per game on average and Lugano 1.65. The Super League average is 3.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Grasshopper's matches and 65% of Lugano's.
What form are Grasshopper and Lugano in?
Over the last 5 games Grasshopper have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Lugano 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grasshopper vs Lugano?
The statistical background for Grasshopper vs Lugano — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.