Switzerland - Super LeagueStadion LetzigrundData current as of 28 October 2026

Grasshopper vs Vaduz: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Grasshopper vs Vaduz: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Grasshopper play Vaduz in Super League (Switzerland). The match date is 31 October 2026. Venue: Stadion Letzigrund.

Current form

Grasshopper: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Vaduz: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Grasshopper scores 1.18 and concedes 2.36 goals per match. Vaduz scores 2.00 and concedes 2.09. League average: 3.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Grasshopper 64%, Vaduz 91%. Over 2.5: Grasshopper 55%, Vaduz 100%. League level: BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 74%.

xG, shots and style

Grasshopper has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.53. Grasshopper: 14.6 shots per match, Vaduz: 13.9.

Match halves

Grasshopper: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.55. Vaduz: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Grasshopper: 31-45+ (4 goals). Vaduz: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 3.67 goals per match, BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 74%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 7.00, BTTS 100%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(2.28)
(3.75)
(2.71)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.18Goals scored / match2
GrasshopperVaduz
2.36Goals conceded / match2.09
GrasshopperVaduz
44%Average possession57%
GrasshopperVaduz
4.36Shots on target / match5
GrasshopperVaduz

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.55Shots per match13.91
GrasshopperVaduz
4.36Shots on target5
GrasshopperVaduz
8.1%Shot conversion14.4%
GrasshopperVaduz
44%Possession57%
GrasshopperVaduz
1.56xG for1.53
GrasshopperVaduz
1.84xG against2.01
GrasshopperVaduz

Shooting quality

Grasshopper: AttackingVaduz: Efficient finishing
GrasshopperVaduz
Accuracy (shots on target)30%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Vaduz is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Grasshopper · 1.2 pts / match - Vaduz

Grasshopper
WLLLD
Season result split
18% W27% D55% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-6
0.82 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-3
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 2.08BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Vaduz
WLLWL
Season result split
27% W0% D73% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-8
0.82 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-6
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Vaduz is 69% better for: goals scored per match.

1.18 goals / match - Grasshopper · 2 goals / match - Vaduz

Vaduz is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.36 goals / match - Grasshopper · 2.09 goals / match - Vaduz

Grasshopper scoring profile: very strong

Grasshopper scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Vaduz keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 matches).

Vaduz scoring profile: very strong

Vaduz scores in 100% of matches (11 of 11 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

13Goals scored (season)22
GrasshopperVaduz
26Goals conceded (season)23
GrasshopperVaduz
3.55Average goals in match4.09
GrasshopperVaduz
4Goals scored (last 5)9
GrasshopperVaduz
12Goals conceded (last 5)7
GrasshopperVaduz

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal100%
GrasshopperVaduz
36%2 goals55%
GrasshopperVaduz
0%3 goals27%
GrasshopperVaduz
0%4 goals9%
GrasshopperVaduz

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal91%
GrasshopperVaduz
64%2 goals82%
GrasshopperVaduz
36%3 goals27%
GrasshopperVaduz
36%4 goals9%
GrasshopperVaduz

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

67%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time45%
GrasshopperVaduz
9%BTTS in both halves9%
GrasshopperVaduz
18%Scored in both halves36%
GrasshopperVaduz

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS91%
GrasshopperVaduz
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
GrasshopperVaduz
40%BTTS - last 580%
GrasshopperVaduz

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time91%
GrasshopperVaduz
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time64%
GrasshopperVaduz
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
GrasshopperVaduz

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
GrasshopperVaduz
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time82%
GrasshopperVaduz
45%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
GrasshopperVaduz

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Grasshopper is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / match - Grasshopper · 1.27 pts / match - Vaduz

Grasshopper - half-time state
27% leading55% draw18% trailing
Vaduz - half-time state
27% leading45% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)1.27
GrasshopperVaduz
0.64Goals scored (1st half)1
GrasshopperVaduz
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)1
GrasshopperVaduz
1.27Average goals (1st half)2
GrasshopperVaduz
55%Clean sheet before half-time27%
GrasshopperVaduz
45%No goal before half-time36%
GrasshopperVaduz

After half-time (2nd half)

0.82Points per match (2nd half)1.27
GrasshopperVaduz
0.55Goals scored (2nd half)1
GrasshopperVaduz
1.73Goals conceded (2nd half)1.09
GrasshopperVaduz
2.27Average goals (2nd half)2.09
GrasshopperVaduz
36%Clean sheet after half-time36%
GrasshopperVaduz
55%No goal after half-time27%
GrasshopperVaduz

Grasshopper - second-half results

18% W27% D55% L
15
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 18%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.1

Concedes 1.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Vaduz - second-half results

36% W18% D45% L
14
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Grasshopper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.8
Average goals in match1.02.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-7
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Vaduz - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Grasshopper
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
2
1
16-30
4
2
31-45
2
7
46-60
1
5
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Vaduz
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
5
31-45
6
4
46-60
3
1
61-75
2
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.81
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 2.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
78%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+83%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
82%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Grasshopper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.90
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
134%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Vaduz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

GrasshopperLigaVaduz
Average goals in match▼ 3.553.67▲ 4.09
Both teams scored▼ 64%67%▲ 91%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 55%74%▲ 100%
Clean sheets▲ 27%18%▼ 9%
Goal before half-time▼ 73%80%▲ 91%
Goal after half-time▼ 82%88%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.67
Average goals per match
67%
Both teams scored
74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
18%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / match
1.76
Away goals / match
+9%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
65%
2 goals
39%
3 goals
15%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Grasshopper 0 - 0 - 1 Vaduz. Average goals 7.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

When do Grasshopper and Vaduz play?

Grasshopper face Vaduz on 31 October 2026 in Super League at Stadion Letzigrund. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Grasshopper vs Vaduz?

Grasshopper score 1.18 goals per game on average and Vaduz 2.00. The Super League average is 3.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 74% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Grasshopper's matches and 91% of Vaduz's.

What form are Grasshopper and Vaduz in?

Over the last 5 games Grasshopper have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Vaduz 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grasshopper vs Vaduz?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Grasshopper vs Vaduz: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.