United States - USL League OneLegacy Early CollegeData current as of 23 October 2026

Greenville Triumph vs Fort Wayne: match statistics

Greenville Triumph vs Fort Wayne: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Greenville Triumph played Fort Wayne in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: Legacy Early College. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Greenville Triumph: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Fort Wayne: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Greenville Triumph scores 1.22 and concedes 1.65 goals per match. Fort Wayne scores 1.48 and concedes 1.26. League average: 2.93 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Greenville Triumph 48%, Fort Wayne 48%. Over 2.5: Greenville Triumph 57%, Fort Wayne 52%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Fort Wayne has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.50. Greenville Triumph: 13.0 shots per match, Fort Wayne: 13.8.

Match halves

Greenville Triumph: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.57. Fort Wayne: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 0.70.

Goals by minute

Greenville Triumph: 0-15 (7 goals). Fort Wayne: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.93 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Greenville Triumph sit lower in the table, but they win 45% of their home matches and average 1.91 goals per game, while Fort Wayne score just 1.33 goals per away match. The hosts also create more quality chances: their average home xG stands at 1.74 compared with Fort Wayne’s 1.44 away from home, while shots on target are 5.73 to 4.25. Neither defence is particularly solid, with Greenville conceding an average of 1.55 goals at home and the visitors 1.50 away, which favors goals at both ends. Recent form is fairly even: Greenville have collected 5 points from five matches, compared with Fort Wayne’s 6, although the hosts conceded 7 goals during that period, versus 10 for their opponents. Home advantage and a clear edge in chance creation give Greenville Triumph slightly better chances of securing the win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The latest form clearly supports goals from both sides: Greenville recorded BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches, while Fort Wayne did so in 60%. During this period, the hosts averaged 1.6 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, whereas the visitors scored 1.8 goals but allowed opponents to find the net 2.0 times per game. Fort Wayne created very good chances, posting an xG of 2.10 across their last five fixtures, while Greenville allowed opponents an xG of 1.62. The hosts’ attack also has favorable conditions, with a seasonal xG of 1.78, while the visitors’ defense concedes an average of 1.5 goals per match. However, the BTTS - Yes pick is not one-sided, as Greenville kept a clean sheet in 55% of their league matches and has a seasonal BTTS rate of just 36%. Nevertheless, the current attacking efficiency of both teams gives a slight edge to the scenario in which each side scores.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Greenville score an average of 1.64 goals per match, while Fort Wayne concede 1.50, which supports at least one goal for the home side. The visitors average 1.33 goals, whereas Greenville allow an average of 1.00, making their attacking contribution a realistic possibility as well. The 1.5 line was exceeded in 82% of Greenville’s matches and in as many as 92% of Fort Wayne’s games, providing very strong confirmation for the over. In their last five matches, the teams averaged a combined 3.0 and 3.8 goals respectively, while Fort Wayne conceded 10 goals during that period. The projected total of 2.72 goals indicates that Over 1.5 has by far the strongest edge, although at the 3.5 line, Greenville’s defensive stability, reflected in a 55% clean-sheet rate, should be taken into account.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Greenville Triumph has a clearly stronger home profile: they average 1.64 goals scored and concede just 1.00, while Fort Wayne allow opponents 1.50 goals away from home. The advantage is also evident in chance quality, with the hosts’ xG standing at 1.78 compared with 1.44 for the visitors, while Greenville average 5.55 shots on target against Fort Wayne’s 4.25. The hosts led at the break in 50% of their matches, whereas the visitors were trailing at half-time in 42% of their games, reinforcing the scenario of an early Greenville advantage. Greenville keep a clean sheet in 55% of matches, compared with just 17% for Fort Wayne, and after the break they average 0.90 goals scored and 0.50 conceded. The hosts’ last five appearances were weaker in the first halves, but their defensive stability and greater attacking potential primarily support the expectation that they will maintain their lead until the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
14Shots8
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
5Shots on target2
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
1.66xG0.92
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
9Corners2
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
59Dangerous attacks37
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
20Fouls13
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
4Cards3
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
1.22Goals scored / match1.48
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
1.65Goals conceded / match1.26
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
46%Average possession53%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
4.39Shots on target / match4.87
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.96Shots per match13.78
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
4.39Shots on target4.87
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
9.4%Shot conversion10.7%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
46%Possession53%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
1.5xG for1.6
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
1.5xG against1.38
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne

Shooting quality

Greenville Triumph: BalancedFort Wayne: Balanced
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
Accuracy (shots on target)34%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fort Wayne is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Greenville Triumph · 1.2 pts / match - Fort Wayne

Greenville Triumph
DDLWL
Season result split
26% W22% D52% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-12
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-3
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Fort Wayne
LLWWL
Season result split
39% W26% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-8
1.43 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-5
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 2.11Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fort Wayne is 21% better for: goals scored per match.

1.22 goals / match - Greenville Triumph · 1.48 goals / match - Fort Wayne

Fort Wayne is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.65 goals / match - Greenville Triumph · 1.26 goals / match - Fort Wayne

Greenville Triumph scoring profile: strong

Greenville Triumph scores in 61% of matches (14 of 23 matches), while Fort Wayne keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).

Fort Wayne scoring profile: very strong

Fort Wayne scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while Greenville Triumph keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).

28Goals scored (season)34
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
38Goals conceded (season)29
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
2.87Average goals in match2.74
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
8Goals scored (last 5)9
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
7Goals conceded (last 5)10
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne

How often they score at least...

61%1 goal78%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
26%2 goals43%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
26%3 goals22%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
9%4 goals4%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal65%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
57%2 goals43%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
22%3 goals13%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
4%4 goals4%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
Greenville Triumph - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 23 matches
59%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time9%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
4%BTTS in both halves0%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
22%Scored in both halves22%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
22%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
80%BTTS - last 560%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fort Wayne is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - Greenville Triumph · 1.7 pts / match - Fort Wayne

Greenville Triumph - half-time state
22% leading48% draw30% trailing
Fort Wayne - half-time state
48% leading26% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.7
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.78
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
0.74Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
1.26Average goals (1st half)1.22
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
52%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
61%No goal before half-time48%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne

After half-time (2nd half)

1.04Points per match (2nd half)1.39
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)0.74
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
1.35Average goals (2nd half)1.43
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
43%Clean sheet after half-time52%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne
61%No goal after half-time52%
Greenville TriumphFort Wayne

Greenville Triumph - second-half results

22% W39% D39% L
26
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding118%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fort Wayne - second-half results

35% W35% D30% L
39
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding81%

Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 39%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Greenville Triumph - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-3+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Fort Wayne - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Greenville Triumph
ScoredConceded
7
7
0-15
4
5
16-30
4
8
31-45
6
4
46-60
4
5
61-75
3
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Fort Wayne
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
4
3
16-30
7
5
31-45
6
5
46-60
7
5
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Greenville Triumph

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

Fort Wayne

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Greenville TriumphLigaFort Wayne
Average goals in match• 2.872.93▼ 2.74
Both teams scored▼ 48%59%▼ 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 57%59%▼ 52%
Clean sheets▼ 17%23%▲ 35%
Goal before half-time▼ 70%73%▲ 78%
Goal after half-time▼ 74%81%▼ 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.93
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.75
Home goals / match
1.18
Away goals / match
+48%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Greenville TriumphGoalConnor Evans
  2. Greenville TriumphYellow cardIvan Agyaakwah
  3. Fort WayneYellow cardEmerson Nieto
  4. Fort WayneYellow cardLogan Neidlinger
  5. Greenville TriumphGoalBrandon FrickeAssist: Azaad Liadi
  6. Greenville TriumphYellow cardAzaad Liadi
  7. Fort WayneGoalRyan BecherAssist: Kabiru Gafar
  8. Greenville TriumphYellow cardAlex Villanueva
  9. Fort WayneGoalRyan BecherAssist: Taig Healy
  10. Greenville TriumphSubstitutionOn: Brigham Magnus Titer LarsenOff: Azaad Liadi
  11. Fort WayneYellow cardTiago Alexandre Soares Dias
  12. Greenville TriumphYellow cardMubashir Nour
  13. Greenville TriumphSubstitutionOn: Toby SimsOff: Ivan Agyaakwah
  14. Fort WayneSubstitutionOn: Kameron LaceyOff: Ryan Becher
  15. Greenville TriumphSubstitutionOn: Rodrigo Robles GrajeraOff: Devin Boyce
  16. Fort WayneSubstitutionOn: Jayden SmithOff: Kabiru Gafar
  17. Fort WayneSubstitutionOn: Juan Fernando Solís CuenúOff: Logan Neidlinger

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Greenville Triumph 0 - 0 - 1 Fort Wayne. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Greenville Triumph vs Fort Wayne?

The USL League One match finished Greenville Triumph 1:3 Fort Wayne. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Greenville Triumph vs Fort Wayne?

Greenville Triumph score 1.22 goals per game on average and Fort Wayne 1.48. The USL League One average is 2.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Greenville Triumph's matches and 48% of Fort Wayne's.

What form are Greenville Triumph and Fort Wayne in?

Over the last 5 games Greenville Triumph have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Fort Wayne 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Greenville Triumph vs Fort Wayne?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.