Grobiņa vs BFC Daugavpils: match statistics
Grobiņa vs BFC Daugavpils: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Grobiņa played BFC Daugavpils in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Venue: Grobiņas stadionā. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Grobiņa: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. BFC Daugavpils: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Grobiņa scores 0.70 and concedes 1.85 goals per match. BFC Daugavpils scores 1.22 and concedes 1.15. League average: 2.99 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Grobiņa 41%, BFC Daugavpils 52%. Over 2.5: Grobiņa 33%, BFC Daugavpils 41%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
BFC Daugavpils has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.20. Grobiņa: 9.7 shots per match, BFC Daugavpils: 13.1.
Match halves
Grobiņa: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.37. BFC Daugavpils: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.85.
Goals by minute
Grobiņa: 76-90+ (5 goals). BFC Daugavpils: 46-60 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 2.99 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 7 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-3. Average goals 2.86, BTTS 57%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
BFC Daugavpils sit 4th, while Grobiņa are eighth, and the gap is also reflected in their current form: the visitors have collected 10 points from their last five matches, compared with just 1 for the hosts. Grobiņa have lost 4 of their last 5 games and conceded as many as 18 goals in that run, whereas Daugavpils allowed their opponents only 3 goals over the same period. The visitors create more chances away from home, averaging 12.58 shots and 4.50 shots on target per match compared with Grobiņa’s 9.15 and 3.31, while their xG stands at 1.50 versus 1.17 for the hosts. Grobiņa’s attack is also highly inconsistent, failing to score in 54% of home matches, whereas Daugavpils have failed to find the net in only 17% of away fixtures. Although the visitors have won just 17% of their away matches and drawn as many as 42%, their current defensive stability and significantly stronger form point towards an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The scenario of both teams scoring is primarily supported by Grobiņa’s recent form: they have averaged 1.2 goals scored but conceded as many as 3.6 per game across their last 5 matches, with BTTS landing in 80% of those fixtures. BFC Daugavpils have sufficient attacking potential to exploit this defensive weakness, averaging 1.4 goals over their last 5 league games, with an xG of 1.71. The hosts should also create chances, as their average xG stands at 1.63, while Daugavpils have conceded an average of 1.67 goals per away match throughout the season and have kept a clean sheet in only 17% of fixtures. The risk to the pick is the visitors’ solid current defensive record, having conceded just 0.6 goals per game in their last five appearances; however, Grobiņa’s poor defensive run slightly shifts the forecast towards BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as at least two goals were scored in 83% of Daugavpils matches and 47% of Grobiņa fixtures, while the 0.5 line was surpassed in 92% and 87% of cases, respectively. The hosts are on a very poor defensive run: they have conceded 18 goals in their last five matches, averaging 3.6 per game, with an xG against of 2.23. Over the same period, Daugavpils averaged 1.71 xG and scored 1.4 goals, giving the visitors a clear chance of finding the net at least once. The season-long combined xG figures, 1.63 for Grobiņa and 1.50 for Daugavpils, also point to a potential total close to 3 goals. Over 2.5 goals has positive supporting arguments, but with lower confidence, as only 33% of Grobiņa matches and 50% of Daugavpils games went above this line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
BFC Daugavpils have collected 10 points from their last five matches, winning three of them and conceding just 0.6 goals per game, while Grobiņa have lost four of their last five fixtures and allowed opponents an average of 3.6 goals. The first-half picture is particularly significant: the hosts have failed to score before the break in any of their last five appearances, while conceding an average of 1.8 goals and going into half-time trailing in 80% of cases. The visitors have been more stable before the break, scoring an average of 0.4 goals and conceding 0.4, with the score level after 45 minutes in 60% of their recent matches. Daugavpils also have the stronger current second-half attacking efficiency, averaging 1.0 goals scored and just 0.2 conceded across their last five games. Although Grobiņa's seasonal home results are better, the current disparity in form and the hosts' extremely weak defence point primarily to the visitors leading at the break and securing the final victory.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Grobiņa | BFC Daugavpils | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
BFC Daugavpils is 900% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Grobiņa · 2 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
BFC Daugavpils is 74% better for: goals scored per match.
0.7 goals / match - Grobiņa · 1.22 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils
BFC Daugavpils is 61% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.85 goals / match - Grobiņa · 1.15 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils
Grobiņa scores in 52% of matches (14 of 27 matches), while BFC Daugavpils keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).
BFC Daugavpils scores in 70% of matches (19 of 27 matches), while Grobiņa keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Grobiņa
Over / Under - BFC Daugavpils
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
BFC Daugavpils is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.93 pts / match - Grobiņa · 1.3 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Grobiņa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
BFC Daugavpils - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -7 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (14 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Grobiņa
BFC Daugavpils
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Grobiņa | Liga | BFC Daugavpils | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.56 | 2.99 | ▼ 2.37 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 55% | ▼ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 56% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 24% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 76% | ▼ 52% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 82% | • 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (7): Grobiņa 3 - 1 - 3 BFC Daugavpils. Average goals 2.86, both teams scored in 57% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Grobiņa vs BFC Daugavpils?
The Virsliga match finished Grobiņa 1:0 BFC Daugavpils. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Grobiņa and BFC Daugavpils?
In the last 7 head-to-head matches Grobiņa won 3, BFC Daugavpils won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.86 goals, with both teams scoring in 57% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Grobiņa vs BFC Daugavpils?
Grobiņa score 0.70 goals per game on average and BFC Daugavpils 1.22. The Virsliga average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Grobiņa's matches and 52% of BFC Daugavpils's.
What form are Grobiņa and BFC Daugavpils in?
Over the last 5 games Grobiņa have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and BFC Daugavpils 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grobiņa vs BFC Daugavpils?
The statistical background for Grobiņa vs BFC Daugavpils — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


