Latvia - VirsligaGrobiņas stadionāData current as of 06 September 2026

Grobiņa vs Super Nova: match statistics

Grobiņa crest
Grobiņa
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Super Nova crest
Super Nova

Grobiņa vs Super Nova: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Grobiņa played Super Nova in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 20 May 2026. Venue: Grobiņas stadionā. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Grobiņa: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. Super Nova: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Grobiņa scores 0.69 and concedes 1.62 goals per match. Super Nova scores 1.15 and concedes 1.38. League average: 3.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Grobiņa 38%, Super Nova 69%. Over 2.5: Grobiņa 23%, Super Nova 54%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Super Nova has higher xG: 1.09 vs 1.06. Grobiņa: 8.6 shots per match, Super Nova: 8.3.

Match halves

Grobiņa: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.31. Super Nova: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.46.

Goals by minute

Grobiņa: 0-15 (3 goals). Super Nova: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 3.09 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 0-4-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 40%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Super Nova is the favorite based on concrete metrics: the visitors have 15 goals this season, averaging 1.00 goal per away match and xG 1.10, whereas Grobiņa scores only 0.57 goals at home with xG 0.97. The visitors average 3.14 shots on target per away match and achieve a 13% conversion rate, while the hosts register only 2 shots on target and a 7% conversion, indicating superior efficiency for Super Nova. Defensively the hosts are problematic — Grobiņa have conceded 21 goals this season and as many as 12 in the last 5 matches (2.4 per match on average), and concede 1.57 goals at home on average; Super Nova concede 1.00 goal on average in away fixtures. In the last 5 matches Grobiņa have not won once (0-4-1) and average 0.8 points per match, while Super Nova are 2-1-2 and average 1.4 points per match, which confirms the visitors' edge. Considering Grobiņa’s 0% home-win rate, the high share of goalless matches for Grobiņa (71%) and the visitors’ superior efficiency and xG, I predict a Super Nova victory, although the hosts’ high draw rate (43%) also gives a realistic chance of a point share.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Grobiņa at home has a seasonal BTTS 100% and 0% clean sheets, concedes on average 1.83 goals per season and as many as 2.4 goals in the last 5 matches, which strongly indicates opponents regularly score against them. Super Nova has a seasonal BTTS 43% and 29% clean sheets, but scores on average 1.0 goal per season and 1.2 goals in the last 5 matches, so they possess sufficient offensive capability to exploit the hosts' defensive weaknesses. Both teams have similar attacking xG: 1.08 (Grobiņa) versus 1.10 (Super Nova), while Grobiņa allows opponent xG of 1.83 versus 1.46 for Super Nova, which suggests bilateral scoring opportunities. Additionally, the league BTTS rate is 60% and both teams have 60% BTTS in their last 5 matches, so based on seasonal and recent form statistics the data also favors a scenario where both teams find the net. Based on these numbers I assess the probability of BTTS at 70% (yes) versus 30% (no) and recommend a "yes" bet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Grobiņa scores on average 1.33 goals and concedes 1.83 per match, while Super Nova scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00; home xG is 1.08, away xG 1.10, and xG against is 1.83 for Grobiņa and 1.46 for Super Nova. A simple model (average of home xG_for with away xG_against and vice versa) yields expected 1.27 goals for Grobiņa and 1.46 for Super Nova, totaling 2.73 goals. Season stats show Grobiņa has 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, Super Nova 57%; additionally Grobiņa has 67% of matches over 2.5, Super Nova 43%. Considering the combined expected 2.73, the league average of 3.08 and the high scoring tempo of the home side, the strongest signal is to play Over 1.5 (I assess probability at around 86%). The 2.5 line also shows a moderate edge (~60%), whereas Over 3.5 is unlikely (I estimate ~22%) since the expected 2.73 is well below 3.5 and the away side has 0% of matches over 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is the away side leading at the break and Super Nova winning after 90 minutes (HT/FT 2/2) — I assign this a 34% probability, because Super Nova have won 57% of matches this season versus Grobiņa’s 17%, and in the last five fixtures the visitors led at the break in 40% of cases compared with 0% for the hosts. Grobiņa concede an average of 1.33 goals before half-time and were behind at the break in 50% of their home matches, which suggests the hosts often start matches poorly. Super Nova practically do not concede before half-time (0.14 on average) and score 0.57 goals on average by the break, while their xG_for is slightly higher (xG_for 1.10 versus 1.08 for Grobiņa) with a lower xG_against (1.46 vs 1.83), giving the visitors an advantage for the final result. Additionally, Grobiņa generate a lot of goals before half-time at home (average first-half goals for hosts 2.17 and 100% of matches with at least one goal before the break), yet they earn only 0.83 points per home game versus Super Nova’s 1.71 points per away game, so I expect goals but an away advantage after 90 minutes. Therefore I select HT/FT 2/2 as the strongest signal, with an alternative HT X/FT 2 (22%) if the first half is even.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
GrobiņaSuper Nova
11Shots9
GrobiņaSuper Nova
4Shots on target6
GrobiņaSuper Nova
1.65xG1.4
GrobiņaSuper Nova
6Corners3
GrobiņaSuper Nova
95Dangerous attacks58
GrobiņaSuper Nova
23Fouls13
GrobiņaSuper Nova
3Cards2
GrobiņaSuper Nova

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

GrobiņaSuper Nova
0.69Goals scored / match1.15
GrobiņaSuper Nova
1.62Goals conceded / match1.38
GrobiņaSuper Nova
42%Average possession42%
GrobiņaSuper Nova
2.54Shots on target / match3.15
GrobiņaSuper Nova

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.62Shots per match8.31
GrobiņaSuper Nova
2.54Shots on target3.15
GrobiņaSuper Nova
8%Shot conversion13.9%
GrobiņaSuper Nova
42%Possession42%
GrobiņaSuper Nova
1.06xG for1.09
GrobiņaSuper Nova
1.56xG against1.63
GrobiņaSuper Nova

Shooting quality

Grobiņa: BalancedSuper Nova: Counter-attacking
GrobiņaSuper Nova
Accuracy (shots on target)29%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Super Nova is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Grobiņa · 1.4 pts / match - Super Nova

Grobiņa
DDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
15% W46% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-6-5
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-3-4
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
LLDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Super Nova
WLLDW
Season result split
38% W15% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-6
1.31 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-0-3
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.94Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Super Nova is 67% better for: goals scored per match.

0.69 goals / match - Grobiņa · 1.15 goals / match - Super Nova

Super Nova is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.62 goals / match - Grobiņa · 1.38 goals / match - Super Nova

Grobiņa scoring profile: strong

Grobiņa scores in 54% of matches (7 of 13 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

Super Nova scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Grobiņa keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

9Goals scored (season)15
GrobiņaSuper Nova
21Goals conceded (season)18
GrobiņaSuper Nova
2.31Average goals in match2.54
GrobiņaSuper Nova
5Goals scored (last 5)6
GrobiņaSuper Nova
12Goals conceded (last 5)5
GrobiņaSuper Nova

How often they score at least...

54%1 goal85%
GrobiņaSuper Nova
8%2 goals23%
GrobiņaSuper Nova
8%3 goals8%
GrobiņaSuper Nova
0%4 goals0%
GrobiņaSuper Nova

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal85%
GrobiņaSuper Nova
31%2 goals38%
GrobiņaSuper Nova
23%3 goals8%
GrobiņaSuper Nova
8%4 goals8%
GrobiņaSuper Nova

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time23%
GrobiņaSuper Nova
8%BTTS in both halves0%
GrobiņaSuper Nova
8%Scored in both halves8%
GrobiņaSuper Nova

BTTS and goal count

8%Min. 3 goals and BTTS54%
GrobiņaSuper Nova
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
GrobiņaSuper Nova
60%BTTS - last 560%
GrobiņaSuper Nova

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
GrobiņaSuper Nova
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
GrobiņaSuper Nova
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
GrobiņaSuper Nova

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
GrobiņaSuper Nova
23%Min. 2 goals after half-time15%
GrobiņaSuper Nova
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
GrobiņaSuper Nova

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Super Nova is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Grobiņa · 1.31 pts / match - Super Nova

Grobiņa - half-time state
15% leading54% draw31% trailing
Super Nova - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.31
GrobiņaSuper Nova
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.69
GrobiņaSuper Nova
0.85Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
GrobiņaSuper Nova
1.23Average goals (1st half)1.38
GrobiņaSuper Nova
54%Clean sheet before half-time54%
GrobiņaSuper Nova
69%No goal before half-time54%
GrobiņaSuper Nova

After half-time (2nd half)

0.92Points per match (2nd half)1.23
GrobiņaSuper Nova
0.31Goals scored (2nd half)0.46
GrobiņaSuper Nova
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)0.69
GrobiņaSuper Nova
1.08Average goals (2nd half)1.15
GrobiņaSuper Nova
46%Clean sheet after half-time38%
GrobiņaSuper Nova
69%No goal after half-time54%
GrobiņaSuper Nova

Grobiņa - second-half results

15% W46% R38% P
13
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Super Nova - second-half results

38% W8% R54% P
17
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Grobiņa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.2
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Super Nova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Grobiņa
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
1
7
31-45
1
6
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
4
1
16-30
3
6
31-45
1
4
46-60
1
1
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
78%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Grobiņa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
43%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

GrobiņaLigaSuper Nova
Average goals in match 2.313.09 2.54
Both teams scored 38%61% 69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 23%56% 54%
Clean sheets 23%20% 15%
Goal before half-time 62%77% 69%
Goal after half-time 69%86% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.09
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.62
Home goals / match
1.47
Away goals / match
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+-9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. GrobiņaYellow cardOļģerts Raščevskis
  2. Super NovaGoalValerijs Lizunovs
  3. GrobiņaSubstitutionOn: Devids DobrecovsOff: Martin Jose
  4. GrobiņaSubstitutionOn: Hirotaka YamadaOff: Artem Kholod
  5. Super NovaSubstitutionOn: Ndiaye PathéOff: Ralfs Šitjakovs
  6. GrobiņaYellow cardMaksims Fjodorovs
  7. GrobiņaSubstitutionOn: Ali ArunaOff: Maksims Fjodorovs
  8. Super NovaYellow cardFacundo García
  9. GrobiņaSubstitutionOn: Rodrigo GaučisOff: Jānis Krautmanis
  10. Super NovaGoalAlens Grikovs
  11. Super NovaYellow cardDāvis Viljams Veisbuks
  12. GrobiņaYellow cardIvan Matyushenko

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Grobiņa 0 - 4 - 1 Super Nova. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 40% matches.

Grobiņa
0 : 1
Super Nova
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
0 : 0
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
0 : 0
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
1 : 1
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
1 : 1
Grobinas Sporta Centrs

FAQ

What was the result of Grobiņa vs Super Nova?

The Virsliga match finished Grobiņa 0:2 Super Nova. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Grobiņa and Super Nova?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Grobiņa won 0, Super Nova won 1 and 4 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Grobiņa vs Super Nova?

Grobiņa score 0.69 goals per game on average and Super Nova 1.15. The Virsliga average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Grobiņa's matches and 69% of Super Nova's.

What form are Grobiņa and Super Nova in?

Over the last 5 games Grobiņa have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Super Nova 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grobiņa vs Super Nova?

The statistical background for Grobiņa vs Super Nova — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.