Guangzhou E-Power vs Dalian Huayi: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Guangzhou E-Power vs Dalian Huayi: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Guangzhou E-Power play Dalian Huayi in China League One (China). The match date is 12 September 2026. Venue: Yuexiushan Stadium.
Current form
Guangzhou E-Power: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Dalian Huayi: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Guangzhou E-Power scores 2.05 and concedes 0.82 goals per match. Dalian Huayi scores 1.33 and concedes 1.52. League average: 2.73 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Guangzhou E-Power 55%, Dalian Huayi 67%. Over 2.5: Guangzhou E-Power 55%, Dalian Huayi 57%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Guangzhou E-Power has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.42. Guangzhou E-Power: 15.7 shots per match, Dalian Huayi: 12.1.
Match halves
Guangzhou E-Power: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.05. Dalian Huayi: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.52.
Goals by minute
Guangzhou E-Power: 76-90+ (11 goals). Dalian Huayi: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
China League One: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-2-0. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Guangzhou E-Power | Dalian Huayi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Guangzhou E-Power is 86% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Guangzhou E-Power · 1.4 pts / match - Dalian Huayi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Guangzhou E-Power is 54% better for: goals scored per match.
2.05 goals / match - Guangzhou E-Power · 1.33 goals / match - Dalian Huayi
Guangzhou E-Power is 85% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.82 goals / match - Guangzhou E-Power · 1.52 goals / match - Dalian Huayi
Guangzhou E-Power scores in 91% of matches (20 of 22 matches), while Dalian Huayi keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 matches).
Dalian Huayi scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while Guangzhou E-Power keeps a clean sheet in 41% (9 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Guangzhou E-Power
Over / Under - Dalian Huayi
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Guangzhou E-Power is 51% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.95 pts / match - Guangzhou E-Power · 1.29 pts / match - Dalian Huayi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Guangzhou E-Power - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 68%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Dalian Huayi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +7 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Guangzhou E-Power
Dalian Huayi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Guangzhou E-Power | Liga | Dalian Huayi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.86 | 2.73 | ▲ 2.86 |
| Both teams scored | • 55% | 56% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 55% | 53% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 41% | 26% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 70% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | • 73% | 73% | ▼ 62% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Guangzhou E-Power 1 - 2 - 0 Dalian Huayi. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
When do Guangzhou E-Power and Dalian Huayi play?
Guangzhou E-Power face Dalian Huayi on 12 September 2026 in China League One at Yuexiushan Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Guangzhou E-Power and Dalian Huayi?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Guangzhou E-Power won 1, Dalian Huayi won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Guangzhou E-Power vs Dalian Huayi?
Guangzhou E-Power score 2.05 goals per game on average and Dalian Huayi 1.33. The China League One average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Guangzhou E-Power's matches and 67% of Dalian Huayi's.
What form are Guangzhou E-Power and Dalian Huayi in?
Over the last 5 games Guangzhou E-Power have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Dalian Huayi 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Guangzhou E-Power vs Dalian Huayi?
The statistical background for Guangzhou E-Power vs Dalian Huayi — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.