Guangzhou E-Power vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: match statistics
Guangzhou E-Power vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Guangzhou E-Power played Heilongjiang Lava Spring in China League One (China). The match was played on 11 October 2026. Venue: Yuexiushan Stadium. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Guangzhou E-Power: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Guangzhou E-Power scores 2.08 and concedes 0.84 goals per match. Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores 1.40 and concedes 1.84. League average: 2.65 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Guangzhou E-Power 60%, Heilongjiang Lava Spring 80%. Over 2.5: Guangzhou E-Power 56%, Heilongjiang Lava Spring 56%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Guangzhou E-Power has higher xG: 1.79 vs 1.33. Guangzhou E-Power: 16.1 shots per match, Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 11.1.
Match halves
Guangzhou E-Power: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 1.08. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.68.
Goals by minute
Guangzhou E-Power: 76-90+ (13 goals). Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
China League One: 2.65 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Guangzhou E-Power, the league leaders, have won 16 of their 24 matches, while 14th-placed Heilongjiang Lava Spring have recorded 4 wins in 25 games. The hosts are unbeaten in their last 5 matches, scoring 12 goals, while the visitors have failed to win during the same period and have scored 5. At home, Guangzhou average 1.92 goals scored and 0.67 conceded, whereas Heilongjiang score 1.42 goals per away game but concede as many as 2.00. The hosts' advantage is also reflected in the quality of their chances: their home xG stands at 2.03, compared with the visitors' away xG of 1.09. A draw remains possible, as Heilongjiang have drawn 50% of their away matches, but the combination of a more potent attack and a sturdier defence points to a Guangzhou win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS has landed in 85% of Guangzhou E-Power matches and 75% of Heilongjiang Lava Spring fixtures, well above the league average of 55%. Both teams have kept a clean sheet in only 8% of their matches, while their season averages for goals conceded are 1.69 and 2.00, respectively—factors that favor goals at both ends. The home side has stronger indicators for scoring: its average xG is 1.56, compared with 1.71 xG conceded by the visitors, who have allowed an average of 1.6 goals across their last five matches. The visitors also have a realistic chance of scoring, averaging 1.42 goals, while the hosts concede 1.69 on average, although they have reduced that figure to 0.8 over their last five games. Guangzhou’s defensive improvement slightly lowers confidence in the prediction, but the season-long metrics favor BTTS - Yes (Goal/Goal).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
At least two goals were scored in 85% of Guangzhou E-Power’s matches and 83% of Heilongjiang Lava Spring’s, providing stronger support for this line than for the 2.5-goal threshold. The hosts average 1.38 goals scored, while the visitors concede 2.00; their average xG figures of 1.56 in attack and 1.71 in defense further point to chances for Guangzhou. In their last five matches, the hosts averaged 2.4 goals scored, while Heilongjiang conceded 1.6, confirming the hosts’ attacking edge in their recent form. The visitors also have a chance to get on the scoresheet: they average 1.42 goals per season, while Guangzhou concede 1.69. A combined projected total of 2.90 goals, alongside season hit rates of 85% and 83%, makes Over 1.5 the clearer pick over Over 2.5, which landed in 54% and 58% of these teams’ matches.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw is slightly more likely than a home lead at the break: Heilongjiang were level at half-time in 3 of their last 5 matches and conceded an average of just 0.2 goals in the first half, although Guangzhou led at the break 3 times over the same period. The advantage shifts clearly toward the home side after the break: Guangzhou scored an average of 1.2 goals in the second half across their last 5 matches, while the visitors conceded 1.4 and lost that half 4 times. Full-time results also highlight the difference in form: Guangzhou won 3 of their last 5 matches and lost none, while Heilongjiang failed to win any and suffered 3 defeats. The hosts also create more chances over the season, averaging 1.56 xG compared with the visitors' 1.09. A half-time draw followed by a Guangzhou win is therefore the strongest scenario, though only narrowly ahead of Guangzhou leading from the start.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Guangzhou E-Power | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Guangzhou E-Power is 450% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Guangzhou E-Power · 0.4 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Guangzhou E-Power is 49% better for: goals scored per match.
2.08 goals / match - Guangzhou E-Power · 1.4 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Guangzhou E-Power is 119% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.84 goals / match - Guangzhou E-Power · 1.84 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Guangzhou E-Power scores in 92% of matches (23 of 25 matches), while Heilongjiang Lava Spring keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 25 matches).
Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores in 84% of matches (21 of 25 matches), while Guangzhou E-Power keeps a clean sheet in 36% (9 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Guangzhou E-Power
Over / Under - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Guangzhou E-Power is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / match - Guangzhou E-Power · 1.32 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Guangzhou E-Power - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 68%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 16%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Guangzhou E-Power
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Guangzhou E-Power | Liga | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.92 | 2.65 | ▲ 3.24 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 55% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 51% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 27% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 72% | 69% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 74% | ▲ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Guangzhou E-Power 1 - 1 - 1 Heilongjiang Lava Spring. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Guangzhou E-Power vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?
The China League One match finished Guangzhou E-Power 3:1 Heilongjiang Lava Spring. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Guangzhou E-Power and Heilongjiang Lava Spring?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Guangzhou E-Power won 1, Heilongjiang Lava Spring won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Guangzhou E-Power vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?
Guangzhou E-Power score 2.08 goals per game on average and Heilongjiang Lava Spring 1.40. The China League One average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Guangzhou E-Power's matches and 80% of Heilongjiang Lava Spring's.
What form are Guangzhou E-Power and Heilongjiang Lava Spring in?
Over the last 5 games Guangzhou E-Power have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Heilongjiang Lava Spring 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Guangzhou E-Power vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?
The statistical background for Guangzhou E-Power vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


