China - China League OneYuexiushan StadiumData current as of 17 October 2026

Guangzhou E-Power vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: match statistics

Guangzhou E-Power vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Guangzhou E-Power played Heilongjiang Lava Spring in China League One (China). The match was played on 11 October 2026. Venue: Yuexiushan Stadium. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Guangzhou E-Power: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Guangzhou E-Power scores 2.08 and concedes 0.84 goals per match. Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores 1.40 and concedes 1.84. League average: 2.65 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Guangzhou E-Power 60%, Heilongjiang Lava Spring 80%. Over 2.5: Guangzhou E-Power 56%, Heilongjiang Lava Spring 56%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Guangzhou E-Power has higher xG: 1.79 vs 1.33. Guangzhou E-Power: 16.1 shots per match, Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 11.1.

Match halves

Guangzhou E-Power: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 1.08. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.68.

Goals by minute

Guangzhou E-Power: 76-90+ (13 goals). Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

China League One: 2.65 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Guangzhou E-Power, the league leaders, have won 16 of their 24 matches, while 14th-placed Heilongjiang Lava Spring have recorded 4 wins in 25 games. The hosts are unbeaten in their last 5 matches, scoring 12 goals, while the visitors have failed to win during the same period and have scored 5. At home, Guangzhou average 1.92 goals scored and 0.67 conceded, whereas Heilongjiang score 1.42 goals per away game but concede as many as 2.00. The hosts' advantage is also reflected in the quality of their chances: their home xG stands at 2.03, compared with the visitors' away xG of 1.09. A draw remains possible, as Heilongjiang have drawn 50% of their away matches, but the combination of a more potent attack and a sturdier defence points to a Guangzhou win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS has landed in 85% of Guangzhou E-Power matches and 75% of Heilongjiang Lava Spring fixtures, well above the league average of 55%. Both teams have kept a clean sheet in only 8% of their matches, while their season averages for goals conceded are 1.69 and 2.00, respectively—factors that favor goals at both ends. The home side has stronger indicators for scoring: its average xG is 1.56, compared with 1.71 xG conceded by the visitors, who have allowed an average of 1.6 goals across their last five matches. The visitors also have a realistic chance of scoring, averaging 1.42 goals, while the hosts concede 1.69 on average, although they have reduced that figure to 0.8 over their last five games. Guangzhou’s defensive improvement slightly lowers confidence in the prediction, but the season-long metrics favor BTTS - Yes (Goal/Goal).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

At least two goals were scored in 85% of Guangzhou E-Power’s matches and 83% of Heilongjiang Lava Spring’s, providing stronger support for this line than for the 2.5-goal threshold. The hosts average 1.38 goals scored, while the visitors concede 2.00; their average xG figures of 1.56 in attack and 1.71 in defense further point to chances for Guangzhou. In their last five matches, the hosts averaged 2.4 goals scored, while Heilongjiang conceded 1.6, confirming the hosts’ attacking edge in their recent form. The visitors also have a chance to get on the scoresheet: they average 1.42 goals per season, while Guangzhou concede 1.69. A combined projected total of 2.90 goals, alongside season hit rates of 85% and 83%, makes Over 1.5 the clearer pick over Over 2.5, which landed in 54% and 58% of these teams’ matches.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw is slightly more likely than a home lead at the break: Heilongjiang were level at half-time in 3 of their last 5 matches and conceded an average of just 0.2 goals in the first half, although Guangzhou led at the break 3 times over the same period. The advantage shifts clearly toward the home side after the break: Guangzhou scored an average of 1.2 goals in the second half across their last 5 matches, while the visitors conceded 1.4 and lost that half 4 times. Full-time results also highlight the difference in form: Guangzhou won 3 of their last 5 matches and lost none, while Heilongjiang failed to win any and suffered 3 defeats. The hosts also create more chances over the season, averaging 1.56 xG compared with the visitors' 1.09. A half-time draw followed by a Guangzhou win is therefore the strongest scenario, though only narrowly ahead of Guangzhou leading from the start.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

72Possession (%)28
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
19Shots8
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
6Shots on target2
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
2.02xG0.85
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
4Corners2
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
57Dangerous attacks27
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
8Fouls13
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
3Cards4
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
2.08Goals scored / match1.4
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0.84Goals conceded / match1.84
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
54%Average possession50%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
5.2Shots on target / match4.04
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.12Shots per match11.12
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
5.2Shots on target4.04
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
12.9%Shot conversion12.6%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
54%Possession50%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.79xG for1.33
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.11xG against1.62
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Shooting quality

Guangzhou E-Power: AttackingHeilongjiang Lava Spring: Balanced
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Accuracy (shots on target)32%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Guangzhou E-Power is 450% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Guangzhou E-Power · 0.4 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Guangzhou E-Power
WDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
68% W24% D8% L
Season (W-D-L)
17-6-2
2.28 pts / match · goal difference +31
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-1
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
16% W48% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-12-9
0.96 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-6-4
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Guangzhou E-Power is 49% better for: goals scored per match.

2.08 goals / match - Guangzhou E-Power · 1.4 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Guangzhou E-Power is 119% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.84 goals / match - Guangzhou E-Power · 1.84 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Guangzhou E-Power scoring profile: very strong

Guangzhou E-Power scores in 92% of matches (23 of 25 matches), while Heilongjiang Lava Spring keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 25 matches).

Heilongjiang Lava Spring scoring profile: very strong

Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores in 84% of matches (21 of 25 matches), while Guangzhou E-Power keeps a clean sheet in 36% (9 of 25 matches).

52Goals scored (season)35
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
21Goals conceded (season)46
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
2.92Average goals in match3.24
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
11Goals scored (last 5)5
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring

How often they score at least...

92%1 goal84%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
68%2 goals36%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
36%3 goals16%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
8%4 goals4%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal92%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
12%2 goals44%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
4%3 goals32%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
4%4 goals12%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
Guangzhou E-Power - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.15 of 25 matches
80%
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.20 of 25 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time28%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0%BTTS in both halves16%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
40%Scored in both halves24%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS52%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
80%BTTS - last 560%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time28%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Guangzhou E-Power is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Guangzhou E-Power · 1.32 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Guangzhou E-Power - half-time state
52% leading44% draw4% trailing
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - half-time state
32% leading36% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.32
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1Goals scored (1st half)0.72
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0.24Goals conceded (1st half)0.76
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.24Average goals (1st half)1.48
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
80%Clean sheet before half-time48%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
32%No goal before half-time48%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring

After half-time (2nd half)

1.68Points per match (2nd half)0.92
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.08Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)1.08
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.68Average goals (2nd half)1.76
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
52%Clean sheet after half-time28%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring
36%No goal after half-time44%
Guangzhou E-PowerHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Guangzhou E-Power - second-half results

40% W48% D12% L
50
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+19
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 68%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring - second-half results

20% W32% D48% L
33
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 16%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Guangzhou E-Power - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+4+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.4
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+2-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Guangzhou E-Power
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
10
2
16-30
9
2
31-45
4
4
46-60
10
4
61-75
13
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
8
7
16-30
7
5
31-45
5
10
46-60
7
8
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
116%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
77%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Guangzhou E-Power

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.68
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.56
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).

Teams vs league

Guangzhou E-PowerLigaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Average goals in match▲ 2.922.65▲ 3.24
Both teams scored▲ 60%55%▲ 80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 56%51%▲ 56%
Clean sheets▲ 36%27%▼ 8%
Goal before half-time▲ 72%69%▲ 76%
Goal after half-time▼ 72%74%▲ 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.65
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Heilongjiang Lava SpringGoalManuel Emilio Palacios Murillo
  2. Heilongjiang Lava SpringYellow cardYucheng Hao
  3. Guangzhou E-PowerGoalYu HouAssist: João Carlos Cardoso Santo
  4. Heilongjiang Lava SpringYellow cardZhi Li
  5. Guangzhou E-PowerYellow cardShenghao Huang
  6. Guangzhou E-PowerSubstitutionOn: Bin LiuOff: Liu Langzhou
  7. Heilongjiang Lava SpringYellow cardJia Du
  8. Heilongjiang Lava SpringYellow cardErikys da Silva Ferreira
  9. Heilongjiang Lava SpringSubstitutionOn: Su GaoOff: Zimin Zhang
  10. Heilongjiang Lava SpringSubstitutionOn: Bowen YangOff: Zhi Li
  11. Guangzhou E-PowerGoalOusmane CamaraAssist: Bin Liu
  12. Guangzhou E-PowerSubstitutionOn: Kun XiaoOff: Yu Hou
  13. Heilongjiang Lava SpringSubstitutionOn: Yujie ZhangOff: Yucheng Hao
  14. Heilongjiang Lava SpringSubstitutionOn: Jiahao YanOff: Daciel Elis Santos
  15. Guangzhou E-PowerSubstitutionOn: Jingbin WangOff: João Carlos Cardoso Santo
  16. Guangzhou E-PowerGoalOusmane CamaraAssist: Jingbin Wang
  17. Guangzhou E-PowerYellow cardOusmane Camara
  18. Guangzhou E-PowerYellow cardBin Liu

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Guangzhou E-Power 1 - 1 - 1 Heilongjiang Lava Spring. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring
1 : 3
Guangzhou E-Power
Guangdong GZ-Power FC
0 : 1
Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC
Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC
1 : 1
Guangdong GZ-Power FC

FAQ

What was the result of Guangzhou E-Power vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?

The China League One match finished Guangzhou E-Power 3:1 Heilongjiang Lava Spring. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Guangzhou E-Power and Heilongjiang Lava Spring?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Guangzhou E-Power won 1, Heilongjiang Lava Spring won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Guangzhou E-Power vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?

Guangzhou E-Power score 2.08 goals per game on average and Heilongjiang Lava Spring 1.40. The China League One average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Guangzhou E-Power's matches and 80% of Heilongjiang Lava Spring's.

What form are Guangzhou E-Power and Heilongjiang Lava Spring in?

Over the last 5 games Guangzhou E-Power have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Heilongjiang Lava Spring 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Guangzhou E-Power vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?

The statistical background for Guangzhou E-Power vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.