South Korea - K League 1Gwangju World Cup StadiumData current as of 06 September 2026

Gwangju vs Ulsan: match statistics

Gwangju crest
Gwangju
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Ulsan crest
Ulsan

Gwangju vs Ulsan: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Gwangju played Ulsan in K League 1 (South Korea). The match was played on 5 July 2026. Venue: Gwangju World Cup Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Gwangju: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Ulsan: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Gwangju scores 0.47 and concedes 2.47 goals per match. Ulsan scores 1.47 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.32 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Gwangju 27%, Ulsan 60%. Over 2.5: Gwangju 53%, Ulsan 53%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots and style

Ulsan has higher xG: 1.80 vs 1.01. Gwangju: 7.8 shots per match, Ulsan: 15.5.

Match halves

Gwangju: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.33. Ulsan: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Gwangju: 46-60 (3 goals). Ulsan: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 1: 2.32 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-3. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 40%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back an Ulsan (2) win. Ulsan scored 22 goals this season and has 8 wins, while Gwangju has only 7 goals and 1 win, indicating the visitors’ superiority in season-long efficiency. In the last 5 matches Ulsan scored 5 goals and won 3 times, averaging 1.8 points per game, whereas Gwangju failed to score in their last five and average 0.2 points per game. The visitors create more chances: 13.29 average shots and 4.57 shots on target away versus 8.14 and 2.71 for the home side, and Ulsan’s xG 1.61 vs Gwangju 1.08 points to higher-quality opportunities for the visitors. Additionally, Gwangju concedes 2.00 goals on average at home and has shipped 14 goals in the last 5, while Ulsan concedes 1.14 away and only 5 in their last 5; Gwangju fail to score in 71% of home matches versus 29% for Ulsan, therefore I assign 70% for an away win, 18% for a draw and 12% for a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal indicators favor BTTS - Yes: Gwangju posts a seasonal BTTS of 63% and Ulsan 57% (avg 60%) versus the league level of 47%. xG also supports both sides — xG for Gwangju is 1.97 with xG against Ulsan 1.53, while xG for Ulsan is 1.61 with xG against Gwangju 1.60, suggesting potential for >1.5 xG for both teams. Both teams create chances (avg 17.5 vs 13.29 shots and 5.5 vs 4.57 shots on target) with conversion rates of 9% and 10%, which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. A counterargument is Gwangju’s poor form — 0 goals scored and 14 conceded in the last 5 matches (avg 2.8 per match), and seasonally 7 scored vs 37 conceded, which reduces confidence in a both-teams-to-score outcome. Despite that, the combined signal (high BTTS 63%/57%, xG above 1.5 and Ulsan’s low clean sheet rate of 14%) gives the edge to the "Yes" scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG model and expected goals: Gwangju generates xG 1.97 while Ulsan concedes 1.53 xG per match, implying an expected home output ≈1.75; Ulsan generates xG 1.61 and Gwangju concedes 1.60 xG, yielding an expected away output ≈1.61 and a total ≈3.36. Seasonal stats confirm an offensive profile: Gwangju scores 1.63 and concedes 1.50 on average; Ulsan scores 1.29 and concedes 1.14. Over 1.5 occurred in 63% of Gwangju’s matches and 100% of Ulsan’s matches, while Over 2.5 appeared in 63% of home games and 43% of away games. Both teams frequently allow goals from both sides: BTTS is 63% for the home side and 57% for the away side, and 63% of Gwangju’s matches were simultaneously Over 2.5 and BTTS, which increases the likelihood of multiple goals. Recent form is asymmetric — Gwangju in the last 5 matches is “lldll”, scoring 0 and conceding 14, whereas Ulsan in their last five are lwwwl, scoring 5 and conceding 5, suggesting Ulsan can exploit the home side’s defensive issues. Considering the combined xG ≈3.36, shot activity (Gwangju 17.5 shots/5.5 on target vs Ulsan 13.29/4.57) and dominant Over 1.5 indicators (63%/100%), the strongest and most reliable signal is a play on Over 1.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Gwangju led at the break in 50% of their home matches and averages 0.88 goals by half-time versus Ulsan’s 0.43; home xG by half is 1.97 compared to the visitors’ 1.61, indicating superior first-half chance creation. However, over the full 90 minutes Ulsan performs better both offensively and defensively: Ulsan’s points per game are 1.86 versus Gwangju’s 1.63, visitors win 57% of matches compared to 50% for home teams, and Ulsan concedes 1.14 goals per game on average versus Gwangju’s 1.50. In the last five fixtures Ulsan have won 60% of matches while Gwangju have not recorded a win (0%), highlighting the visitors’ form advantage. Additionally, Ulsan are stronger after the interval — they achieve better second-half results and record 43% wins in second halves — therefore the most reliable signal is Gwangju leading at the break with Ulsan winning at full-time (HT/FT 1/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
GwangjuUlsan
8Shots24
GwangjuUlsan
3Shots on target10
GwangjuUlsan
1.08xG2.8
GwangjuUlsan
3Corners8
GwangjuUlsan
50Dangerous attacks83
GwangjuUlsan
9Fouls6
GwangjuUlsan
1Cards0
GwangjuUlsan

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.47Goals scored / match1.47
GwangjuUlsan
2.47Goals conceded / match1.33
GwangjuUlsan
45%Average possession47%
GwangjuUlsan
2.27Shots on target / match5.07
GwangjuUlsan

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.8Shots per match15.53
GwangjuUlsan
2.27Shots on target5.07
GwangjuUlsan
6%Shot conversion9.4%
GwangjuUlsan
45%Possession47%
GwangjuUlsan
1.01xG for1.8
GwangjuUlsan
1.8xG against1.57
GwangjuUlsan

Shooting quality

Gwangju: BalancedUlsan: Attacking
GwangjuUlsan
Accuracy (shots on target)29%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ulsan is 800% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Gwangju · 1.8 pts / match - Ulsan

Gwangju
LLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
7% W27% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-4-10
0.47 pts / match · goal difference -30
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-4
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 0.76Opponent xG: 2.01BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 60%
Ulsan
LWWWL
Season result split
53% W13% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-2-5
1.73 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ulsan is 213% better for: goals scored per match.

0.47 goals / match - Gwangju · 1.47 goals / match - Ulsan

Ulsan is 86% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.47 goals / match - Gwangju · 1.33 goals / match - Ulsan

Gwangju scoring profile: mixed

Gwangju scores in 27% of matches (4 of 15 matches), while Ulsan keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

Ulsan scoring profile: very strong

Ulsan scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Gwangju keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

7Goals scored (season)22
GwangjuUlsan
37Goals conceded (season)20
GwangjuUlsan
2.93Average goals in match2.8
GwangjuUlsan
0Goals scored (last 5)5
GwangjuUlsan
14Goals conceded (last 5)5
GwangjuUlsan

How often they score at least...

27%1 goal73%
GwangjuUlsan
13%2 goals47%
GwangjuUlsan
7%3 goals13%
GwangjuUlsan
0%4 goals7%
GwangjuUlsan

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal80%
GwangjuUlsan
53%2 goals27%
GwangjuUlsan
47%3 goals13%
GwangjuUlsan
40%4 goals13%
GwangjuUlsan

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time13%
GwangjuUlsan
7%BTTS in both halves0%
GwangjuUlsan
7%Scored in both halves33%
GwangjuUlsan

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
GwangjuUlsan
33%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
GwangjuUlsan
0%BTTS - last 540%
GwangjuUlsan

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
GwangjuUlsan
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
GwangjuUlsan
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
GwangjuUlsan

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
GwangjuUlsan
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
GwangjuUlsan
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
GwangjuUlsan

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ulsan is 213% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.47 pts / match - Gwangju · 1.47 pts / match - Ulsan

Gwangju - half-time state
0% leading47% draw53% trailing
Ulsan - half-time state
40% leading27% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.47Points per match (1st half)1.47
GwangjuUlsan
0.13Goals scored (1st half)0.67
GwangjuUlsan
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
GwangjuUlsan
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.47
GwangjuUlsan
40%Clean sheet before half-time53%
GwangjuUlsan
87%No goal before half-time53%
GwangjuUlsan

After half-time (2nd half)

0.6Points per match (2nd half)1.33
GwangjuUlsan
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
GwangjuUlsan
1.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
GwangjuUlsan
1.8Average goals (2nd half)1.33
GwangjuUlsan
27%Clean sheet after half-time47%
GwangjuUlsan
80%No goal after half-time40%
GwangjuUlsan

Gwangju - second-half results

7% W40% R53% P
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-17
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.47
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ulsan - second-half results

27% W53% R20% P
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Gwangju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.20
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match1.01.8
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-5-9
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Ulsan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.60
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Gwangju
ScoredConceded
0
5
0-15
1
5
16-30
1
5
31-45
3
10
46-60
2
3
61-75
0
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

Ulsan
ScoredConceded
0
5
0-15
6
4
16-30
4
3
31-45
2
2
46-60
4
2
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.87
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
124%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
20%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Gwangju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.79
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.54
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.67
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
43%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
201%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Ulsan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).

Teams vs league

GwangjuLigaUlsan
Average goals in match 2.932.32 2.80
Both teams scored 27%48% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%40% 53%
Clean sheets 20%31% 20%
Goal before half-time 60%62% 80%
Goal after half-time 73%76% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.32
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.10
Home goals / match
1.23
Away goals / match
+-11%
Home attack advantage
+-12%
Home defence advantage
+-14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. GwangjuYellow cardJe-Ho Yu
  2. UlsanSubstitutionOn: Benji MichelOff: Sang-Woo Kang
  3. GwangjuSubstitutionOn: Sung-hyun ParkOff: Se-Jong Ju
  4. GwangjuGoalMin-seo MoonAssist: Ji-Hun Jung
  5. GwangjuSubstitutionOn: Bae-hyeon GongOff: Sang-Ki Min
  6. UlsanSubstitutionOn: Min-Hyeok LeeOff: Darijan Bojanic
  7. UlsanSubstitutionOn: Si-Young JangOff: Sang-Min Sim

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Gwangju 1 - 1 - 3 Ulsan. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 40% matches.

Ulsan
5 : 1
Gwangju
Gwangju FC
2 : 0
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i
2 : 0
Gwangju FC
Gwangju FC
1 : 1
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i
3 : 0
Gwangju FC

FAQ

What was the result of Gwangju vs Ulsan?

The K League 1 match finished Gwangju 1:1 Ulsan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Gwangju and Ulsan?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Gwangju won 1, Ulsan won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Gwangju vs Ulsan?

Gwangju score 0.47 goals per game on average and Ulsan 1.47. The K League 1 average is 2.32 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 27% of Gwangju's matches and 60% of Ulsan's.

What form are Gwangju and Ulsan in?

Over the last 5 games Gwangju have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Ulsan 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gwangju vs Ulsan?

The statistical background for Gwangju vs Ulsan — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.