South Korea - K League 2Changwon Football CenterData current as of 23 July 2026

Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners: match statistics

Gyeongnam crest
Gyeongnam
5 : 0half-time 3:0
Ansan Greeners crest
Ansan Greeners

Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Gyeongnam play Ansan Greeners in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 19 July 2026 at 12:30. Venue: Changwon Football Center. Final score: 5:0.

Current form

Gyeongnam: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Ansan Greeners: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Gyeongnam scores 1.47 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. Ansan Greeners scores 1.00 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Gyeongnam 65%, Ansan Greeners 65%. Over 2.5: Gyeongnam 53%, Ansan Greeners 65%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Gyeongnam has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.18. Gyeongnam: 11.7 shots per match, Ansan Greeners: 8.9.

Match halves

Gyeongnam: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.88. Ansan Greeners: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.53.

Goals by minute

Gyeongnam: 76-90+ (9 goals). Ansan Greeners: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

4 H2H matches: 1-2-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Gyeongnam sits 9th in the table while Ansan are 15th; hosts have scored 20 goals this season versus the visitors’ 17, with Gyeongnam conceding 25 and Ansan 29. In the last 5 matches Gyeongnam’s record is 1-2-2 (avg. 1.0 point per match), whereas Ansan have 1-0-4 (avg. 0.6 pts/match); during that span the hosts conceded 7 goals and the visitors 12. At home Gyeongnam average 1.56 goals per game on 11.78 shots and 3.67 shots on target, and the share of matches without a goal is only 11%; Ansan away average 1.2 goals per game with as many as 40% of away matches goalless for them. In terms of quality of chances Gyeongnam record an average xG of 1.34 with xG against 1.22, while Ansan have away xG 1.18 but xG against 2.18, indicating the visitors allow opponents to create far better chances. Considering the hosts’ superior scoring efficiency, the low percentage of matches without a goal (11% vs 40%) and Ansan’s weaker defense over the last five fixtures, I forecast a Gyeongnam victory (probability 60%), draw 25% and away win 15%.

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
14Shots3
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
7Shots on target1
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.85xG0.56
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
2Corners1
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
65Dangerous attacks41
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
8Fouls8
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1Cards4
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.47Goals scored / match1
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.47Goals conceded / match2
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
50%Average possession46%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
3.71Shots on target / match3.82
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.71Shots per match8.94
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
3.71Shots on target3.82
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
12.6%Shot conversion11.2%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
50%Possession46%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.37xG for1.18
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.25xG against2.07
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

Shooting quality

Gyeongnam: BalancedAnsan Greeners: Balanced
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
Accuracy (shots on target)32%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Gyeongnam is 167% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Gyeongnam · 0.6 pts / match - Ansan Greeners

Gyeongnam
LDWDW
Season result split
35% W29% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-6
1.35 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-3
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Ansan Greeners
LLLWL
Season result split
24% W12% R65% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-11
0.82 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 2.70BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gyeongnam is 47% better for: goals scored per match.

1.47 goals / match - Gyeongnam · 1 goals / match - Ansan Greeners

Gyeongnam is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.47 goals / match - Gyeongnam · 2 goals / match - Ansan Greeners

Gyeongnam scoring profile: very strong

Gyeongnam scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 17 matches).

Ansan Greeners scoring profile: very strong

Ansan Greeners scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Gyeongnam keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 matches).

25Goals scored (season)17
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
25Goals conceded (season)34
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
2.94Average goals in match3
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
10Goals scored (last 5)4
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
6Goals conceded (last 5)15
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal71%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
41%2 goals18%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
18%3 goals6%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
6%4 goals6%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal94%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
47%2 goals59%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
6%3 goals35%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
6%4 goals6%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time29%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
0%BTTS in both halves0%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
29%Scored in both halves0%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
60%BTTS - last 560%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
59%Min. 2 goals after half-time65%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Gyeongnam is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Gyeongnam · 0.94 pts / match - Ansan Greeners

Gyeongnam - half-time state
18% leading47% draw35% trailing
Ansan Greeners - half-time state
18% leading41% draw41% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.94
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.47
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.82
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.29
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
53%Clean sheet before half-time35%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
53%No goal before half-time53%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)0.82
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.76Goals conceded (2nd half)1.18
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.65Average goals (2nd half)1.71
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
47%Clean sheet after half-time47%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
41%No goal after half-time76%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

Gyeongnam - second-half results

29% W41% R29% P
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ansan Greeners - second-half results

18% W29% R53% P
16
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gyeongnam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Ansan Greeners - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.02.0
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-3-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Gyeongnam
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
5
8
31-45
2
2
46-60
4
3
61-75
9
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Ansan Greeners
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
7
31-45
2
6
46-60
3
3
61-75
4
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.97
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-49%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Gyeongnam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Ansan Greeners

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.89
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
143%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

GyeongnamLigaAnsan Greeners
Average goals in match 2.942.75 3.00
Both teams scored 65%61% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%56% 65%
Clean sheets 12%24% 6%
Goal before half-time 65%73% 82%
Goal after half-time 76%76% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Gyeongnam 1 - 2 - 1 Ansan Greeners. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Ansan Greeners
1 : 1
Gyeongnam
Gyeongnam FC
1 : 0
Ansan Greeners FC
Gyeongnam FC
1 : 1
Ansan Greeners FC
Ansan Greeners FC
1 : 0
Gyeongnam FC

FAQ

What was the result of Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners?

The K League 2 match finished Gyeongnam 5:0 Ansan Greeners. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Gyeongnam and Ansan Greeners?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Gyeongnam won 1, Ansan Greeners won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners?

Gyeongnam score 1.47 goals per game on average and Ansan Greeners 1.00. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Gyeongnam's matches and 65% of Ansan Greeners's.

What form are Gyeongnam and Ansan Greeners in?

Over the last 5 games Gyeongnam have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Ansan Greeners 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.