Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners: match statistics
Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Gyeongnam played Ansan Greeners in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 19 July 2026. Venue: Changwon Football Center. Final score: 5:0.
Current form
Gyeongnam: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Ansan Greeners: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Gyeongnam scores 1.25 and concedes 1.56 goals per match. Ansan Greeners scores 1.06 and concedes 1.81. League average: 2.76 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Gyeongnam 69%, Ansan Greeners 69%. Over 2.5: Gyeongnam 50%, Ansan Greeners 63%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Gyeongnam has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.22. Gyeongnam: 11.6 shots per match, Ansan Greeners: 9.3.
Match halves
Gyeongnam: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.81. Ansan Greeners: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.56.
Goals by minute
Gyeongnam: 76-90+ (8 goals). Ansan Greeners: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-2-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Gyeongnam sits 9th in the table while Ansan are 15th; hosts have scored 20 goals this season versus the visitors’ 17, with Gyeongnam conceding 25 and Ansan 29. In the last 5 matches Gyeongnam’s record is 1-2-2 (avg. 1.0 point per match), whereas Ansan have 1-0-4 (avg. 0.6 pts/match); during that span the hosts conceded 7 goals and the visitors 12. At home Gyeongnam average 1.56 goals per game on 11.78 shots and 3.67 shots on target, and the share of matches without a goal is only 11%; Ansan away average 1.2 goals per game with as many as 40% of away matches goalless for them. In terms of quality of chances Gyeongnam record an average xG of 1.34 with xG against 1.22, while Ansan have away xG 1.18 but xG against 2.18, indicating the visitors allow opponents to create far better chances. Considering the hosts’ superior scoring efficiency, the low percentage of matches without a goal (11% vs 40%) and Ansan’s weaker defense over the last five fixtures, I forecast a Gyeongnam victory (probability 60%), draw 25% and away win 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A strong signal for BTTS is that Gyeongnam has a season BTTS rate of 82% versus Ansan's 40%, with a league average of 63%, favoring the “both teams to score” option. The hosts have recorded zero clean sheets (0%), while the visitors have only 20% clean sheets; seasonally Gyeongnam has scored 20 and conceded 25, and Ansan has scored 17 and conceded 29, indicating both sides tend to concede. In the last 5 matches both teams show BTTS at 60%: Gyeongnam has xG 1.84 with 5 goals scored and 7 conceded (xG against 1.34), whereas Ansan has xG 1.31 with 4 scored and as many as 12 conceded (xG against 2.55), which shows the visitors have been heavily exposed recently. Additionally, average shots 9.45 vs 9.0, shots on target 3.91 vs 4.2 and conversion rates 11% vs 13% suggest both teams are creating real scoring opportunities, therefore I forecast BTTS - Yes (72%) versus 28% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and goal analysis indicates a moderately high scoring potential: Gyeongnam has xG 1.24 for the season and 1.84 in the last 5 matches, Ansan 1.18 for the season and 1.31 in the last 5; therefore I project 1.54 xG for the home side and 1.25 xG for the away side, totaling 2.79 goals. Strong signal for Over 1.5 comes from the fact that 91% of Gyeongnam’s home matches finished over 1.5 goals, and 80% of Ansan’s matches did as well — average 85.5% (rounded to 86%). The 2.5 line is less clear: seasonally Gyeongnam has 73% of matches Over 2.5, Ansan 40% (average 56.5%) and the league average for Over 2.5 is 56%, so I assess the probability of Over 2.5 at about 57%. Over 3.5 is unlikely — only 36% of home teams and 20% of away teams reached that (average 28%), so Under 3.5 looks safer. Additionally, hosts concede on average 2.0 goals per match, visitors 1.4, and home clean sheets are 0% (away 20%), which further emphasizes Over 1.5 as the optimal market.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The primary scenario is a Half-Time draw and an away win (X/2) — Ansan records 60% draws at the break in away matches and wins 40% of fixtures, whereas Gyeongnam win only 18% at home and lose as many as 73% of games. Hosts lead at the break in 18% of matches and are trailing at half-time in 45% of cases, averaging 0.55 goals scored and 0.82 conceded before the break, which increases the likelihood of a HT draw. After the interval Ansan scores on average 0.8 goals in second halves, while Gyeongnam concedes on average 1.18 goals after the break, so the visitors have greater potential to decide the match in the second half. The teams’ xG figures are similar (1.24 vs 1.18), but both sides have high xG against (2.04 and 2.18), so the game should be open with goals after the break. Therefore I assign the highest probability to the X/2 scenario (30%), with X/X (20%) and 2/2 (15%) as realistic alternatives.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Gyeongnam | Ansan Greeners | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Gyeongnam is 167% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Gyeongnam · 0.6 pts / match - Ansan Greeners
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gyeongnam is 18% better for: goals scored per match.
1.25 goals / match - Gyeongnam · 1.06 goals / match - Ansan Greeners
Gyeongnam is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.56 goals / match - Gyeongnam · 1.81 goals / match - Ansan Greeners
Gyeongnam scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 16 matches).
Ansan Greeners scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Gyeongnam keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gyeongnam
Over / Under - Ansan Greeners
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ansan Greeners is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.88 pts / match - Gyeongnam · 1 pts / match - Ansan Greeners
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gyeongnam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Ansan Greeners - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Gyeongnam
Ansan Greeners
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Gyeongnam | Liga | Ansan Greeners | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.81 | 2.76 | ▲ 2.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 63% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 56% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 6% | 23% | ▼ 6% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 73% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | • 75% | 76% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Gyeongnam 1 - 2 - 1 Ansan Greeners. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners?
The K League 2 match finished Gyeongnam 5:0 Ansan Greeners. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Gyeongnam and Ansan Greeners?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Gyeongnam won 1, Ansan Greeners won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners?
Gyeongnam score 1.25 goals per game on average and Ansan Greeners 1.06. The K League 2 average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Gyeongnam's matches and 69% of Ansan Greeners's.
What form are Gyeongnam and Ansan Greeners in?
Over the last 5 games Gyeongnam have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Ansan Greeners 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.