Haka vs KTP: match statistics
Haka vs KTP: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Haka play KTP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 27 June 2026 at 15:00. Venue: Tehtaan kenttä. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Haka: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. KTP: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Haka scores 1.73 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. KTP scores 1.67 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.47 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Haka 53%, KTP 40%. Over 2.5: Haka 53%, KTP 40%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
KTP has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.59. Haka: 12.0 shots per match, KTP: 15.3.
Match halves
Haka: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.27. KTP: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.07.
Goals by minute
Haka: 76-90+ (8 goals). KTP: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
4 H2H matches: 1-1-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Match description
I predict a Haka win (1) — hosts demonstrate clear home efficiency: on average 2.50 goals per match, 5.67 shots on target and a 19% conversion rate, with 0% of matches without scoring. KTP arrives in excellent form (4 wins in last 5, 2.4 points per match in that period) and shows impressive away defense: on average only 1.0 goals conceded and 67% clean sheets. However, xG indicates a balanced contest: Haka home xG 1.70 versus KTP away xG 1.78, and xG against 1.21 vs 1.16, suggesting similar quality of chances created. The hosts’ key advantage is higher efficiency (actual 2.50 goals vs xG 1.70) and a greater share of shots on target, while the visitors counter with consistency and away clean sheets, hence the forecast is cautiously in favor of Haka.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Haka | KTP | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
KTP is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Haka · 2 pts / match - KTP
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KTP is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.13 goals / match - Haka · 1 goals / match - KTP
Haka scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
KTP scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Haka
Over / Under — KTP
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KTP is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.07 pts / match - Haka · 1.33 pts / match - KTP
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Haka - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
KTP - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Haka
KTP
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| Haka | Liga | KTP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.87 | 2.47 | ▲ 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 44% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 44% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 31% | ▲ 47% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 60% | • 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 73% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Haka 1 - 1 - 2 KTP. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Haka vs KTP?
The Ykkösliiga match finished Haka 0:2 KTP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Haka and KTP?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Haka won 1, KTP won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Haka vs KTP?
Haka score 1.73 goals per game on average and KTP 1.67. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Haka's matches and 40% of KTP's.
What form are Haka and KTP in?
Over the last 5 games Haka have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and KTP 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haka vs KTP?
The statistical background for Haka vs KTP — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.