Haka vs MP: match statistics
Haka vs MP: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Haka played MP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Venue: Tehtaan kenttä. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Haka: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. MP: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Haka scores 1.95 and concedes 1.05 goals per match. MP scores 1.05 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.53 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Haka 57%, MP 48%. Over 2.5: Haka 62%, MP 48%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots and style
Haka has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.35. Haka: 13.0 shots per match, MP: 11.3.
Match halves
Haka: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.19. MP: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.43.
Goals by minute
Haka: 76-90+ (12 goals). MP: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Haka sit 3rd, having won 12 of 21 matches this season. They have also recorded 4 wins in their last five games, scoring 12 goals and conceding just 4. MP are showing a clearly weaker trend: they have lost 4 of their last five matches, scoring 5 goals and conceding 11. At home, Haka average 2.36 goals per game with 1.68 xG and win 64% of their matches, while MP score just 0.91 goals per away game and lose as many as 73% of their away fixtures. The hosts also create more chances, averaging 13.27 shots and 5.36 shots on target, compared with MP’s 10.73 shots and 4.09 on target. The visitors’ low scoring efficiency will also be important, as they fail to score in 36% of away matches. Therefore, Haka’s advantage should translate into a win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS occurred in 50% of Haka’s matches over the entire season and in just 45% of MP’s games, placing both teams close to, but not above, the league average of 44%. MP scores only 0.91 goals per match on average and fails to score in 36% of its appearances, making their goal the main risk to a Goal/Goal scenario. Haka are in very good offensive form, scoring 2.4 goals per match in their last 5 games, while conceding just 0.8 and keeping a clean sheet in 20% of the entire season. The visitors have conceded as many as 11 goals in their last five matches, so Haka have strong grounds to score. However, MP’s poor finishing and the hosts’ improved defensive performance support the BTTS - No scenario, meaning that at least one team fails to score. The BTTS - No pick is therefore marginally stronger, with a realistic possibility of Haka winning to nil.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Haka are in excellent attacking form: they have averaged 2.4 goals across their last five matches, while MP conceded as many as 2.2 goals per game over the same period. In these five appearances, the hosts recorded an average xG of 1.77, whereas MP allowed opponents 1.50 xG, which supports the expectation of at least two Haka goals. The 1.5-goal line was exceeded in 70% of Haka’s matches and 55% of MP’s matches this season, while neither team has finished a game without at least one goal scored in total. Additionally, Over 2.5 goals landed in 80% of Haka’s last five matches and 60% of MP’s, making Over 1.5 the safest selection with a projected total of 3.17 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Haka are in clearly better recent form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 2.4 goals and conceding just 0.8, while MP have lost 4 of their last 5 games, averaging 1.0 goal scored and 2.2 conceded. The first-half indicators are particularly strong: Haka held a lead at the break in 80% of their last five matches, whereas MP were behind at half-time in 80% of their games, conceding an average of 2.2 goals before the interval. Across the season as a whole, the hosts have also taken the lead at half-time more often—60% compared with just 9% for the visitors—and their first-half points return stands at 1.8 points per match, compared with MP’s 0.91. Haka’s advantage should persist after the interval, as MP have lost 73% of their league matches, while Haka have won 40% and have a significantly higher average points return: 1.4 versus 0.64. The scenario in which the hosts lead at half-time and go on to win is therefore the strongest HT/FT selection, supported by both their current form and the distribution of first-half results.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Haka | MP | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Haka is 300% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Haka · 0.6 pts / match - MP
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Haka is 86% better for: goals scored per match.
1.95 goals / match - Haka · 1.05 goals / match - MP
Haka is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.05 goals / match - Haka · 1.57 goals / match - MP
Haka scores in 86% of matches (18 of 21 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 matches).
MP scores in 67% of matches (14 of 21 matches), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Haka
Over / Under - MP
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Haka is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.48 pts / match - Haka · 1.33 pts / match - MP
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Haka - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
MP - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 2.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 3.2 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -6 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Haka
MP
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| Haka | Liga | MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.00 | 2.53 | • 2.62 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 44% | ▲ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 62% | 45% | ▲ 48% |
| Clean sheets | • 33% | 32% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 63% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 71% | ▼ 52% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Haka 0 - 0 - 2 MP. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Haka vs MP?
The Ykkösliiga match finished Haka 0:2 MP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Haka and MP?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Haka won 0, MP won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Haka vs MP?
Haka score 1.95 goals per game on average and MP 1.05. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Haka's matches and 48% of MP's.
What form are Haka and MP in?
Over the last 5 games Haka have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and MP 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haka vs MP?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Haka vs MP: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


