Finland - YkkösliigaTehtaan kenttäData current as of 07 September 2026

Haka vs MP: match statistics

Haka crest
Haka
0 : 2half-time 0:1
MP crest
MP

Haka vs MP: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Haka played MP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Venue: Tehtaan kenttä. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Haka: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. MP: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Haka scores 1.95 and concedes 1.05 goals per match. MP scores 1.05 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Haka 57%, MP 48%. Over 2.5: Haka 62%, MP 48%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Haka has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.35. Haka: 13.0 shots per match, MP: 11.3.

Match halves

Haka: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.19. MP: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

Haka: 76-90+ (12 goals). MP: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Haka sit 3rd, having won 12 of 21 matches this season. They have also recorded 4 wins in their last five games, scoring 12 goals and conceding just 4. MP are showing a clearly weaker trend: they have lost 4 of their last five matches, scoring 5 goals and conceding 11. At home, Haka average 2.36 goals per game with 1.68 xG and win 64% of their matches, while MP score just 0.91 goals per away game and lose as many as 73% of their away fixtures. The hosts also create more chances, averaging 13.27 shots and 5.36 shots on target, compared with MP’s 10.73 shots and 4.09 on target. The visitors’ low scoring efficiency will also be important, as they fail to score in 36% of away matches. Therefore, Haka’s advantage should translate into a win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS occurred in 50% of Haka’s matches over the entire season and in just 45% of MP’s games, placing both teams close to, but not above, the league average of 44%. MP scores only 0.91 goals per match on average and fails to score in 36% of its appearances, making their goal the main risk to a Goal/Goal scenario. Haka are in very good offensive form, scoring 2.4 goals per match in their last 5 games, while conceding just 0.8 and keeping a clean sheet in 20% of the entire season. The visitors have conceded as many as 11 goals in their last five matches, so Haka have strong grounds to score. However, MP’s poor finishing and the hosts’ improved defensive performance support the BTTS - No scenario, meaning that at least one team fails to score. The BTTS - No pick is therefore marginally stronger, with a realistic possibility of Haka winning to nil.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Haka are in excellent attacking form: they have averaged 2.4 goals across their last five matches, while MP conceded as many as 2.2 goals per game over the same period. In these five appearances, the hosts recorded an average xG of 1.77, whereas MP allowed opponents 1.50 xG, which supports the expectation of at least two Haka goals. The 1.5-goal line was exceeded in 70% of Haka’s matches and 55% of MP’s matches this season, while neither team has finished a game without at least one goal scored in total. Additionally, Over 2.5 goals landed in 80% of Haka’s last five matches and 60% of MP’s, making Over 1.5 the safest selection with a projected total of 3.17 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Haka are in clearly better recent form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 2.4 goals and conceding just 0.8, while MP have lost 4 of their last 5 games, averaging 1.0 goal scored and 2.2 conceded. The first-half indicators are particularly strong: Haka held a lead at the break in 80% of their last five matches, whereas MP were behind at half-time in 80% of their games, conceding an average of 2.2 goals before the interval. Across the season as a whole, the hosts have also taken the lead at half-time more often—60% compared with just 9% for the visitors—and their first-half points return stands at 1.8 points per match, compared with MP’s 0.91. Haka’s advantage should persist after the interval, as MP have lost 73% of their league matches, while Haka have won 40% and have a significantly higher average points return: 1.4 versus 0.64. The scenario in which the hosts lead at half-time and go on to win is therefore the strongest HT/FT selection, supported by both their current form and the distribution of first-half results.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
HakaMP
27Shots10
HakaMP
7Shots on target4
HakaMP
2.98xG1.21
HakaMP
5Corners3
HakaMP
110Dangerous attacks41
HakaMP
10Fouls12
HakaMP
1Cards3
HakaMP

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.95Goals scored / match1.05
HakaMP
1.05Goals conceded / match1.57
HakaMP
56%Average possession51%
HakaMP
4.9Shots on target / match3.86
HakaMP

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13Shots per match11.29
HakaMP
4.9Shots on target3.86
HakaMP
15%Shot conversion9.3%
HakaMP
56%Possession51%
HakaMP
1.65xG for1.35
HakaMP
1.19xG against1.52
HakaMP

Shooting quality

Haka: Efficient finishingMP: Balanced
HakaMP
Accuracy (shots on target)38%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Haka is 300% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Haka · 0.6 pts / match - MP

Haka
WWWWL
Season result split
57% W19% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-4-5
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
MP
WLLLL
Season result split
29% W14% R57% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-12
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-8
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Haka is 86% better for: goals scored per match.

1.95 goals / match - Haka · 1.05 goals / match - MP

Haka is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.05 goals / match - Haka · 1.57 goals / match - MP

Haka scoring profile: very strong

Haka scores in 86% of matches (18 of 21 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 matches).

MP scoring profile: strong

MP scores in 67% of matches (14 of 21 matches), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 matches).

41Goals scored (season)22
HakaMP
22Goals conceded (season)33
HakaMP
3Average goals in match2.62
HakaMP
12Goals scored (last 5)5
HakaMP
4Goals conceded (last 5)11
HakaMP

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal67%
HakaMP
62%2 goals29%
HakaMP
29%3 goals10%
HakaMP
14%4 goals0%
HakaMP

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal81%
HakaMP
33%2 goals43%
HakaMP
5%3 goals29%
HakaMP
0%4 goals5%
HakaMP

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time19%
HakaMP
5%BTTS in both halves5%
HakaMP
43%Scored in both halves10%
HakaMP

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
HakaMP
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
HakaMP
60%BTTS - last 540%
HakaMP

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
HakaMP
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
HakaMP
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
HakaMP

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time52%
HakaMP
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
HakaMP
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
HakaMP

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Haka is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.48 pts / match - Haka · 1.33 pts / match - MP

Haka - half-time state
43% leading19% draw38% trailing
MP - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.48Points per match (1st half)1.33
HakaMP
0.76Goals scored (1st half)0.62
HakaMP
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.76
HakaMP
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.38
HakaMP
52%Clean sheet before half-time52%
HakaMP
48%No goal before half-time57%
HakaMP

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)0.86
HakaMP
1.19Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
HakaMP
0.48Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
HakaMP
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1.24
HakaMP
57%Clean sheet after half-time52%
HakaMP
24%No goal after half-time67%
HakaMP

Haka - second-half results

52% W43% R5% P
31
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MP - second-half results

10% W57% R33% P
28
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Haka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.401.80
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+6+2
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 7
MP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match1.00.0
Goals conceded / match2.20.0
Average goals in match3.20.0
1 goal100%0%
2 goals80%0%
3 goals60%0%
Clean sheet0%100%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-60
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Haka
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
7
3
16-30
5
3
31-45
6
1
46-60
7
4
61-75
12
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

MP
ScoredConceded
2
8
0-15
3
5
16-30
8
3
31-45
0
6
46-60
2
3
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.81
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-29%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Haka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

MP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

HakaLigaMP
Average goals in match 3.002.53 2.62
Both teams scored 57%44% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%45% 48%
Clean sheets 33%32% 19%
Goal before half-time 81%63% 71%
Goal after half-time 81%71% 52%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. HakaYellow cardEero-Matti Auvinen
  2. MPYellow cardEbuka Obioha Samson
  3. HakaSubstitutionOn: Kevin NurmiOff: Jesper Karlsson
  4. MPYellow cardTyson Afshari
  5. HakaSubstitutionOn: Valentin PurosaloOff: Daniel Enqvist
  6. HakaSubstitutionOn: Nika SitchinavaOff: Thomas Lahdensuo
  7. MPYellow cardVeikko Janhunen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Haka 0 - 0 - 2 MP. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Haka vs MP?

The Ykkösliiga match finished Haka 0:2 MP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Haka and MP?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Haka won 0, MP won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Haka vs MP?

Haka score 1.95 goals per game on average and MP 1.05. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Haka's matches and 48% of MP's.

What form are Haka and MP in?

Over the last 5 games Haka have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and MP 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haka vs MP?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Haka vs MP: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.