Hapoel Petah Tikva vs Maccabi Netanya: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Hapoel Petah Tikva vs Maccabi Netanya: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Hapoel Petah Tikva play Maccabi Netanya in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match date is 10 October 2026. Venue: HaMoshava Stadium.
Current form
Hapoel Petah Tikva: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Maccabi Netanya: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Hapoel Petah Tikva scores 0.40 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. Maccabi Netanya scores 1.20 and concedes 1.20. League average: 3.14 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Hapoel Petah Tikva 20%, Maccabi Netanya 60%. Over 2.5: Hapoel Petah Tikva 40%, Maccabi Netanya 40%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 69%.
xG, shots and style
Maccabi Netanya has higher xG: 1.84 vs 1.03. Hapoel Petah Tikva: 9.0 shots per match, Maccabi Netanya: 15.4.
Match halves
Hapoel Petah Tikva: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.20. Maccabi Netanya: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.20.
Goals by minute
Hapoel Petah Tikva: 0-15 (1 goals). Maccabi Netanya: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Israeli Premier League: 3.14 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 69%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Hapoel Petah Tikva | Maccabi Netanya | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 16% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Maccabi Netanya is 67% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Hapoel Petah Tikva · 1 pts / match - Maccabi Netanya
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Maccabi Netanya is 200% better for: goals scored per match.
0.4 goals / match - Hapoel Petah Tikva · 1.2 goals / match - Maccabi Netanya
Maccabi Netanya is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.6 goals / match - Hapoel Petah Tikva · 1.2 goals / match - Maccabi Netanya
Hapoel Petah Tikva scores in 40% of matches (2 of 5 matches), while Maccabi Netanya keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
Maccabi Netanya scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Hapoel Petah Tikva keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hapoel Petah Tikva
Over / Under - Maccabi Netanya
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hapoel Petah Tikva is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / match - Hapoel Petah Tikva · 0.4 pts / match - Maccabi Netanya
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hapoel Petah Tikva - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Maccabi Netanya - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Hapoel Petah Tikva
Maccabi Netanya
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Hapoel Petah Tikva | Liga | Maccabi Netanya | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.00 | 3.14 | ▼ 2.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 20% | 60% | • 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 69% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 23% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 40% | 71% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 83% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Hapoel Petah Tikva 2 - 0 - 0 Maccabi Netanya. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
When do Hapoel Petah Tikva and Maccabi Netanya play?
Hapoel Petah Tikva face Maccabi Netanya on 10 October 2026 in Israeli Premier League at HaMoshava Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Hapoel Petah Tikva and Maccabi Netanya?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Hapoel Petah Tikva won 2, Maccabi Netanya won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Hapoel Petah Tikva vs Maccabi Netanya?
Hapoel Petah Tikva score 0.40 goals per game on average and Maccabi Netanya 1.20. The Israeli Premier League average is 3.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Hapoel Petah Tikva's matches and 60% of Maccabi Netanya's.
What form are Hapoel Petah Tikva and Maccabi Netanya in?
Over the last 5 games Hapoel Petah Tikva have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Maccabi Netanya 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hapoel Petah Tikva vs Maccabi Netanya?
The statistical background for Hapoel Petah Tikva vs Maccabi Netanya — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.