Estonia - MeistriliigaLaagri kunstmuruData current as of 06 September 2026

Harju Jalgpallikool vs Trans: match statistics

Harju Jalgpallikool crest
Harju Jalgpallikool
3 : 0half-time 2:0
Trans crest
Trans

Harju Jalgpallikool vs Trans: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Harju Jalgpallikool played Trans in Meistriliiga (Estonia). The match was played on 10 July 2026. Venue: Laagri kunstmuru. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Harju Jalgpallikool: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Trans: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Harju Jalgpallikool scores 1.22 and concedes 1.78 goals per match. Trans scores 0.67 and concedes 2.39. League average: 3.04 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Harju Jalgpallikool 50%, Trans 39%. Over 2.5: Harju Jalgpallikool 67%, Trans 72%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Trans has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.48. Harju Jalgpallikool: 12.1 shots per match, Trans: 13.1.

Match halves

Harju Jalgpallikool: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.67. Trans: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Harju Jalgpallikool: 76-90+ (7 goals). Trans: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Meistriliiga: 3.04 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 4-0-2. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Harju Jalgpallikool holds a clear statistical edge at home: they average 1.44 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 33% of home games, while Trans score only 0.22 goals on average away and manage clean sheets in just 11% of away matches. The visitors’ defense is highly vulnerable — Trans concede 3.00 goals per away game and lose 89% of their away fixtures, whereas Harju concede 1.67 goals per home match. In attack the hosts also look superior in terms of chance quality: Harju’s average xG is 1.58 versus Trans’s 1.35, hosts register 4.44 shots on target on average with an 11% conversion rate compared to 3.22 shots on target and a 2% conversion for the visitors. Recent form is poor for both sides (Harju 1 win and 4 losses in the last 5, averaging 0.6 points per game; Trans 1-1-3, averaging 0.8 points per game), but the decisive factor is Trans’s away frailty — no away wins (win percentage 0%) and 78% of away matches without scoring. Given the higher conversion rate, superior shots on target and relatively more stable home defense against Trans’s disastrous away numbers, I forecast a Harju victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I assign a 60% probability to No BTTS and 40% to BTTS = Yes based on seasonal and recent form analysis. Trans as visitors average 0.22 goals per game season-to-date and have a season BTTS rate of only 22%, with 11.11 shots, 3.22 shots on target and a conversion rate of 2%, which severely limits their scoring potential. Harju generates more chances (xG 1.72, 15.0 shots and 4.11 shots on target) and has a seasonal goals average of 1.11 with a 7% conversion, but concedes 1.78 goals per game and only has 22% clean sheets, so a home goal is likely. The key discrepancy is visitors’ xG 1.35 versus actual 0.22 — Trans create chances but their 2% conversion means they most often finish matches without a goal; additionally they concede on average 3.0 goals per game, which often produces one-sided results. In the last 5 games Trans have improved to 2.4 goals per game with 40% BTTS, representing a short-term rebound, but seasonal effectiveness metrics for the visitors remain the dominant signal. Considering 56% BTTS at home and 22% for the visitors plus Trans’s low conversion, the No BTTS scenario is stronger (60% vs 40%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The combined xG is 1.72 for Harju and 1.35 for Trans, yielding an expected total of 3.07 goals. With lambda=3.07 the Poisson distribution gives probability of >=2 goals (Over 1.5) at ~81%, >=3 goals (Over 2.5) at ~59% and >=4 goals (Over 3.5) at ~37%. Seasonal data support this projection: the home side have Over 1.5 in 89% and Over 2.5 in 89% of matches, the visitors have 67% and 56% respectively, and in the last 5 matches the home team recorded Over 2.5 in 80% of cases. Additionally, the home team averages 15 shots and 4.11 on target with a conversion rate of 7%, while the away team averages 11.11 shots and 3.22 on target with a 2% conversion, which correlates with the higher home xG and strengthens the signal for Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I expect a half-time draw and a Harju Jalgpallikool victory after 90 minutes (X/1). Both teams finish the first half level in 33% of their matches, with the home side scoring an average of 0.44 goals by the break versus 0.22 for the visitors. After the interval Harju’s advantage is clear: the hosts have gained 14 second-half points and average 1.56 points per match in the second half compared with just 1 point and 0.11 for Trans, favoring a turnaround after the break. Additionally, Harju averages 1.11 goals per match with an xG of 1.72 versus Trans’s 0.22 goals and xG 1.35; Trans concedes on average 3.0 goals per match and has a 0% win rate this season, so the match finish should favor the hosts. In minutes 76–90 the hosts have scored 4 goals while the visitors have conceded 10 in that interval, therefore the X/1 scenario appears to be the strongest signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
14Shots10
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
6Shots on target2
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
1.97xG1.22
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
5Corners1
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
91Dangerous attacks60
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
10Fouls15
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
0Cards3
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
1.22Goals scored / match0.67
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
1.78Goals conceded / match2.39
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
47%Average possession45%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
3.78Shots on target / match3.67
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.06Shots per match13.06
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
3.78Shots on target3.67
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
10.1%Shot conversion5.1%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
47%Possession45%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
1.48xG for1.54
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
1.9xG against1.71
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans

Shooting quality

Harju Jalgpallikool: BalancedTrans: Balanced
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
Accuracy (shots on target)31%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.18

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Harju Jalgpallikool is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Harju Jalgpallikool · 0.2 pts / match - Trans

Harju Jalgpallikool
WLLLL
Season result split
33% W6% R61% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-11
1.06 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-5
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.73Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Trans
LLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W6% R78% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-14
0.56 pts / match · goal difference -31
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-8
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Harju Jalgpallikool is 82% better for: goals scored per match.

1.22 goals / match - Harju Jalgpallikool · 0.67 goals / match - Trans

Harju Jalgpallikool is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.78 goals / match - Harju Jalgpallikool · 2.39 goals / match - Trans

Harju Jalgpallikool scoring profile: very strong

Harju Jalgpallikool scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Trans keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 matches).

Trans scoring profile: strong

Trans scores in 50% of matches (9 of 18 matches), while Harju Jalgpallikool keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).

22Goals scored (season)12
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
32Goals conceded (season)43
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
3Average goals in match3.06
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
7Goals scored (last 5)2
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
9Goals conceded (last 5)9
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal50%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
44%2 goals11%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
6%3 goals6%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
0%4 goals0%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal83%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
56%2 goals67%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
33%3 goals39%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
6%4 goals17%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Harju Jalgpallikool - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.9 of 18 matches
57%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time17%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
6%BTTS in both halves0%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
17%Scored in both halves11%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
60%BTTS - last 540%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time56%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Harju Jalgpallikool is 66% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / match - Harju Jalgpallikool · 0.67 pts / match - Trans

Harju Jalgpallikool - half-time state
22% leading44% draw33% trailing
Trans - half-time state
11% leading33% draw56% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per match (1st half)0.67
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
0.83Goals conceded (1st half)1.17
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
1.39Average goals (1st half)1.5
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
44%Clean sheet before half-time33%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
50%No goal before half-time72%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per match (2nd half)0.83
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)1.22
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
1.61Average goals (2nd half)1.56
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
39%Clean sheet after half-time28%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans
61%No goal after half-time67%
Harju JalgpallikoolTrans

Harju Jalgpallikool - second-half results

22% W28% R50% P
20
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Trans - second-half results

22% W17% R61% P
12
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding155%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Harju Jalgpallikool - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Trans - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.60
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-4-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Harju Jalgpallikool
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
4
4
16-30
3
8
31-45
3
5
46-60
2
7
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Trans
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
1
7
16-30
4
11
31-45
0
4
46-60
2
6
61-75
4
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.03
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Harju Jalgpallikool

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Trans

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.87
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.68
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
49%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
143%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Meistriliiga).

Teams vs league

Harju JalgpallikoolLigaTrans
Average goals in match 3.003.04 3.06
Both teams scored 50%57% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%65% 72%
Clean sheets 22%23% 17%
Goal before half-time 78%74% 78%
Goal after half-time 83%88% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.04
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Harju JalgpallikoolGoalHugo Palutaja
  2. TransSubstitutionOn: Imoh Imeh JohnOff: Murad Velijev
  3. TransRed cardAleksander Filatov
  4. TransYellow cardStanislav Agaptšev
  5. Harju JalgpallikoolSubstitutionOn: Ander-Joosep KoseOff: Joseph Albert da Silva Ndakala
  6. Harju JalgpallikoolGoalKarel Eerme

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Harju Jalgpallikool 4 - 0 - 2 Trans. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Harju Jalgpallikool
3 : 0
Trans
Trans
1 : 2
Harju Jalgpallikool
Harju Jalgpallikool
1 : 0
JK Narva Trans
JK Narva Trans
1 : 3
Harju Jalgpallikool
JK Narva Trans
4 : 2
Harju Jalgpallikool
Harju Jalgpallikool
0 : 3
JK Narva Trans

FAQ

What was the result of Harju Jalgpallikool vs Trans?

The Meistriliiga match finished Harju Jalgpallikool 3:0 Trans. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Harju Jalgpallikool and Trans?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Harju Jalgpallikool won 4, Trans won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Harju Jalgpallikool vs Trans?

Harju Jalgpallikool score 1.22 goals per game on average and Trans 0.67. The Meistriliiga average is 3.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Harju Jalgpallikool's matches and 39% of Trans's.

What form are Harju Jalgpallikool and Trans in?

Over the last 5 games Harju Jalgpallikool have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Trans 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Harju Jalgpallikool vs Trans?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.