United States - USL ChampionshipDillon StadiumData current as of 17 October 2026

Hartford Athletic vs Charleston Battery: match statistics

Hartford Athletic vs Charleston Battery: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Hartford Athletic played Charleston Battery in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 14 October 2026. Venue: Dillon Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Hartford Athletic: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Charleston Battery: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Hartford Athletic scores 1.11 and concedes 1.04 goals per match. Charleston Battery scores 1.93 and concedes 1.22. League average: 2.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Hartford Athletic 48%, Charleston Battery 44%. Over 2.5: Hartford Athletic 44%, Charleston Battery 56%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Charleston Battery has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.45. Hartford Athletic: 12.0 shots per match, Charleston Battery: 12.6.

Match halves

Hartford Athletic: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.63. Charleston Battery: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 1.04.

Goals by minute

Hartford Athletic: 76-90+ (10 goals). Charleston Battery: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-3. Average goals 3.40, BTTS 80%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Charleston Battery sit 4th and have won 3 of their last 5 matches, but their away record tilts the balance in Hartford Athletic’s favor: the visitors have lost 54% of their away games, while the hosts have lost just 8% at home. Hartford average 1.5 goals per home match, compared with Charleston’s 1.23 goals away, and also create higher-quality chances—their average xG is 1.76 versus 1.27 for their opponents. The hosts also have the defensive edge in this matchup, conceding an average of 1.25 goals at home, compared with Charleston’s 1.69 away. Both teams have scored 8 goals across their last 5 matches, although Charleston have conceded one fewer, so their strong form should not be overlooked. Home advantage tips the prediction in Hartford’s favor, but with the hosts drawing 50% of their home matches, a share of the points remains a significant possibility.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Hartford average 2.77 goals at home, while Charleston concede 1.69 goals per away match, making a home goal highly likely. The greater uncertainty lies with the visitors: they have failed to score in 38% of their away matches, while Hartford have kept a clean sheet in 46% of home games and conceded an average of just 0.69 goals in them. Charleston average 1.23 goals away from home, but their xG is 1.27, which does not provide a strong case against the hosts’ defence. BTTS - Yes has landed in 54% of Hartford’s home matches and just 38% of Charleston’s away games, so the scenario in which at least one team fails to score is marginally more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Hartford score an average of 2.77 goals at home, while Charleston concede 1.69 on the road, giving the hosts a solid basis to score at least twice. The quality of chances supports this: Hartford's xG is 1.90, while Charleston's xG against is 1.44. The 1.5-goal line has been surpassed in 92% of Hartford's home matches and 77% of Charleston's away matches, making Over 1.5 the strongest pick. Higher lines call for caution, as Over 2.5 landed in only 40% of each team's last five matches, and Charleston failed to score in 38% of their away games.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is Hartford Athletic leading at the break and maintaining that advantage through to the end: the hosts were ahead at half-time in 62% of their home matches, and in 4 of their last 5. Their average of 1.23 goals scored and 0.23 conceded before the break points to an early lead, although Charleston were level at half-time in 54% of their away matches, making a draw at the break followed by a home win a notable alternative. Over the full match, Hartford score an average of 2.77 goals at home and win 77% of their matches, while Charleston concede 1.69 goals per away match and lose 54% of them. The hosts’ advantage is also supported by average xG of 1.90 compared with the visitors’ 1.27, and Hartford’s average of 1.54 goals scored after the break compared with Charleston’s 1.08 conceded in that period. Caution is warranted given the visitors’ stronger recent form—they have won 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with Hartford’s 2 wins—but the home and away records still point most strongly to 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

38Possession (%)62
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
8Shots11
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
2Shots on target2
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
1.04xG1.21
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
5Corners4
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
55Dangerous attacks52
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
14Fouls11
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
1Cards2
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
1.11Goals scored / match1.93
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
1.04Goals conceded / match1.22
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
44%Average possession57%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
3.96Shots on target / match5.22
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.96Shots per match12.56
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
3.96Shots on target5.22
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
9.3%Shot conversion15.3%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
44%Possession57%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
1.45xG for1.56
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
1.67xG against1.27
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery

Shooting quality

Hartford Athletic: BalancedCharleston Battery: Efficient finishing
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
Accuracy (shots on target)33%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Hartford Athletic is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Hartford Athletic · 1.4 pts / match - Charleston Battery

Hartford Athletic
WWDDL
Season result split
33% W44% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-12-6
1.44 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-6-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.80BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Charleston Battery
LDWWL
Season result split
52% W15% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-4-9
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-7
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Charleston Battery is 74% better for: goals scored per match.

1.11 goals / match - Hartford Athletic · 1.93 goals / match - Charleston Battery

Hartford Athletic is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.04 goals / match - Hartford Athletic · 1.22 goals / match - Charleston Battery

Hartford Athletic scoring profile: strong

Hartford Athletic scores in 59% of matches (16 of 27 matches), while Charleston Battery keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 matches).

Charleston Battery scoring profile: very strong

Charleston Battery scores in 78% of matches (21 of 27 matches), while Hartford Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 matches).

30Goals scored (season)52
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
28Goals conceded (season)33
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
2.15Average goals in match3.15
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
9Goals scored (last 5)6
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal78%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
41%2 goals52%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
11%3 goals26%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
0%4 goals22%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
30%2 goals41%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
4%3 goals11%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
4%4 goals4%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
Hartford Athletic - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 27 matches
44%
Charleston Battery - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 27 matches
54%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time15%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
0%BTTS in both halves4%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
26%Scored in both halves33%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
80%BTTS - last 540%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time59%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time30%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Charleston Battery is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - Hartford Athletic · 1.67 pts / match - Charleston Battery

Hartford Athletic - half-time state
30% leading44% draw26% trailing
Charleston Battery - half-time state
41% leading44% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1.67
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
0.48Goals scored (1st half)0.89
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
0.52Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
1Average goals (1st half)1.3
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
63%Clean sheet before half-time74%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
59%No goal before half-time52%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.63
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)1.04
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
0.52Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
1.15Average goals (2nd half)1.85
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
56%Clean sheet after half-time44%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery
56%No goal after half-time37%
Hartford AthleticCharleston Battery

Hartford Athletic - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
36
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Charleston Battery - second-half results

48% W19% D33% L
45
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Hartford Athletic - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.20
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference+4-1
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Charleston Battery - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Hartford Athletic
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
5
5
16-30
7
5
31-45
2
3
46-60
5
8
61-75
10
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Charleston Battery
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
10
4
16-30
8
3
31-45
9
5
46-60
5
7
61-75
14
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.65
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Hartford Athletic

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.63
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Charleston Battery

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
161%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Hartford AthleticLigaCharleston Battery
Average goals in match▼ 2.152.71▲ 3.15
Both teams scored▼ 48%54%▼ 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 44%50%▲ 56%
Clean sheets▲ 33%28%▲ 33%
Goal before half-time• 67%66%▼ 59%
Goal after half-time▼ 70%78%▲ 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.51
Home goals / match
1.20
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Hartford AthleticGoalAugustine WilliamsAssist: Baboucarr Njie
  2. Charleston BatterySubstitutionOn: Douglas Francisco Martìnez JuárezOff: Langston Blackstock
  3. Charleston BatterySubstitutionOn: Camilo Andrés Sánchez GonzálezOff: Colton Swan
  4. Charleston BatterySubstitutionOn: Andy CabreraOff: Laurent Kissiedou
  5. Hartford AthleticGoalBaboucarr Njie
  6. Hartford AthleticSubstitutionOn: Michee NgalinaOff: Augustine Williams
  7. Charleston BatteryYellow cardLuis Enrique Jr Zamudio Lizardo
  8. Hartford AthleticYellow cardBenjamin Mines
  9. Charleston BatteryYellow cardDouglas Francisco Martìnez Juárez
  10. Hartford AthleticSubstitutionOn: Michael AdedokunOff: Benjamin Mines

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Hartford Athletic 1 - 1 - 3 Charleston Battery. Average goals 3.40, both teams scored in 80% matches.

Charleston Battery
1 : 2
Hartford Athletic
Hartford Athletic
1 : 2
Charleston Battery
Charleston Battery
4 : 2
Hartford Athletic
Hartford Athletic
2 : 2
Charleston Battery
Charleston Battery
1 : 0
Hartford Athletic

FAQ

What was the result of Hartford Athletic vs Charleston Battery?

The USL Championship match finished Hartford Athletic 1:1 Charleston Battery. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Hartford Athletic and Charleston Battery?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Hartford Athletic won 1, Charleston Battery won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Hartford Athletic vs Charleston Battery?

Hartford Athletic score 1.11 goals per game on average and Charleston Battery 1.93. The USL Championship average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Hartford Athletic's matches and 44% of Charleston Battery's.

What form are Hartford Athletic and Charleston Battery in?

Over the last 5 games Hartford Athletic have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Charleston Battery 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hartford Athletic vs Charleston Battery?

The statistical background for Hartford Athletic vs Charleston Battery — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.