Haverfordwest County vs Briton Ferry: match statistics
Haverfordwest County vs Briton Ferry: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Haverfordwest County played Briton Ferry in Welsh Premier League (Wales). The match was played on 11 September 2026. Venue: New Bridge Meadow Stadium. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Haverfordwest County: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Briton Ferry: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Haverfordwest County scores 0.43 and concedes 1.86 goals per match. Briton Ferry scores 0.71 and concedes 1.71. League average: 3.14 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Haverfordwest County 29%, Briton Ferry 43%. Over 2.5: Haverfordwest County 43%, Briton Ferry 43%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Briton Ferry has higher xG: 1.51 vs 0.93. Haverfordwest County: 8.0 shots per match, Briton Ferry: 12.1.
Match halves
Haverfordwest County: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.43. Briton Ferry: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.29.
Goals by minute
Haverfordwest County: 46-60 (3 goals). Briton Ferry: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Welsh Premier League: 3.14 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 3-0-1. Average goals 2.25, BTTS 25%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Both teams are in poor form, but Haverfordwest County have picked up 4 points from their last 5 matches, compared with just 3 for Briton Ferry. The hosts score only 0.5 goals per game at home and have failed to find the net in 75% of such matches, while the visitors also average just 0.5 goals per away game. Haverfordwest create slightly better chances, as reflected by their average xG of 1.17 compared with Briton Ferry’s 1.09, and they also register more shots: 10.5 versus 8.25 for their opponents. The visitors’ defence concedes an average of 1.25 goals away from home, while allowing opponents an xG as high as 2.02. Therefore, home advantage and the greater number of chances created slightly favour the hosts. The match is expected to be closely contested and relatively low-scoring, but a narrow Haverfordwest County victory is the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as Briton Ferry average just 0.5 goals per match, and only 0.4 across their last five fixtures. The visitors have failed to score in 50% of their league matches, while BTTS has occurred in just 25% of their games and 20% of their last five. Haverfordwest County have yet to keep a clean sheet and concede an average of 2.33 goals, but their current attacking form also looks weak: 0.6 goals and an xG of 0.89 across their last five outings. The hosts create more chances over the full season, recording an xG of 2.06 and 5.33 shots on target per match compared with Briton Ferry’s 1.09 and 2.5. Therefore, the most likely scenario is that one side scores, but both teams do not find the net. Additionally, the latest BTTS figures stand at 40% for Haverfordwest and 20% for Briton Ferry, clearly below the league average of 48%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Haverfordwest have scored just 0.6 goals per game in their last 5 matches, while Briton Ferry have averaged 0.4, although both teams conceded 2.0 goals per game over this period. The hosts create chances worth an average of 2.06 xG at home, but convert them into just 1.0 goal, with a shot conversion rate of 6%. Briton Ferry average 0.5 goals per game this season and have exceeded the 2.5-goal line in the entire match only once in every four games this campaign. Over 3.5 goals have been scored in 33% of Haverfordwest matches and in none of Briton Ferry’s matches, so with a projected total of 2.30 goals, the Under 3.5 goals bet offers a clear edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest HT/FT scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Haverfordwest County win, as the hosts were level at the break in 80% of their last five matches and did not score a single first-half goal during that period. Briton Ferry were trailing at half-time in 60% of their last five games, averaging just 0.2 goals scored and 0.8 conceded in the opening 45 minutes. After the break, the hosts’ advantage should increase: they average 17.33 shots and 5.33 shots on target, compared with the visitors’ 8.25 shots and 2.5 shots on target, while their xG stands at 2.06 versus 1.09 for their opponents. Briton Ferry lost 80% of their last five matches, while Haverfordwest County have a slightly higher points average over this period, 0.8 compared with 0.6. The risk lies in the hosts’ weak defence, which concedes an average of 2.33 goals at home; therefore, a full-time draw and an away win also retain a significant share of the distribution.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Haverfordwest County | Briton Ferry | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 23% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.19 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Haverfordwest County is 33% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Haverfordwest County · 0.6 pts / match - Briton Ferry
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Briton Ferry is 65% better for: goals scored per match.
0.43 goals / match - Haverfordwest County · 0.71 goals / match - Briton Ferry
Briton Ferry is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.86 goals / match - Haverfordwest County · 1.71 goals / match - Briton Ferry
Haverfordwest County scores in 29% of matches (2 of 7 matches), while Briton Ferry keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).
Briton Ferry scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while Haverfordwest County keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 7 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Haverfordwest County
Over / Under - Briton Ferry
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Briton Ferry is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.71 pts / match - Haverfordwest County · 1.14 pts / match - Briton Ferry
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Haverfordwest County - second-half results
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Briton Ferry - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Haverfordwest County
Briton Ferry
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Welsh Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Haverfordwest County | Liga | Briton Ferry | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.29 | 3.14 | ▼ 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 29% | 48% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 57% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 27% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 29% | 79% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 84% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Haverfordwest County 3 - 0 - 1 Briton Ferry. Average goals 2.25, both teams scored in 25% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Haverfordwest County vs Briton Ferry?
The Welsh Premier League match finished Haverfordwest County 3:1 Briton Ferry. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Haverfordwest County and Briton Ferry?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Haverfordwest County won 3, Briton Ferry won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Haverfordwest County vs Briton Ferry?
Haverfordwest County score 0.43 goals per game on average and Briton Ferry 0.71. The Welsh Premier League average is 3.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Haverfordwest County's matches and 43% of Briton Ferry's.
What form are Haverfordwest County and Briton Ferry in?
Over the last 5 games Haverfordwest County have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Briton Ferry 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haverfordwest County vs Briton Ferry?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.