Denmark - 1st DivisionData current as of 08 September 2026

HB Køge vs Esbjerg: match statistics

HB Køge crest
HB Køge
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Esbjerg crest
Esbjerg
130%(2.80)
X25%(3.40)
245%(2.14)

Esbjerg appears to be the favorite for this encounter despite playing away. The visitors occupy 4th place in the table with a record of 10 wins this season, while HB Køge sits in 11th position with just 5 victories. A key factor is Esbjerg's advantage in possession (50% vs 42%) and better shooting efficiency (10% vs 8%). HB Køge has poor home form with 44% losses and only 44% wins at home, conceding an average of 1.11 goals per match. Although Esbjerg has a 56% loss rate away, their offensive potential (28 goals this season) and lack of draws in away matches (0%) suggest they will push for a win. Recent form for both teams is similar (1.2 PPG), however, the squad quality and league position speak in favor of the visitors.

HB Køge vs Esbjerg: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

HB Køge played Esbjerg in 1st Division (Denmark). The match was played on 6 March 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

HB Køge: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Esbjerg: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

HB Køge scores 1.21 and concedes 1.84 goals per match. Esbjerg scores 1.47 and concedes 1.37. League average: 2.82 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: HB Køge 68%, Esbjerg 53%. Over 2.5: HB Køge 63%, Esbjerg 47%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Esbjerg has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.29. HB Køge: 11.7 shots per match, Esbjerg: 13.0.

Match halves

HB Køge: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.79. Esbjerg: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

HB Køge: 76-90+ (7 goals). Esbjerg: 61-75 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1st Division: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Esbjerg appears to be the favorite for this encounter despite playing away. The visitors occupy 4th place in the table with a record of 10 wins this season, while HB Køge sits in 11th position with just 5 victories. A key factor is Esbjerg's advantage in possession (50% vs 42%) and better shooting efficiency (10% vs 8%). HB Køge has poor home form with 44% losses and only 44% wins at home, conceding an average of 1.11 goals per match. Although Esbjerg has a 56% loss rate away, their offensive potential (28 goals this season) and lack of draws in away matches (0%) suggest they will push for a win. Recent form for both teams is similar (1.2 PPG), however, the squad quality and league position speak in favor of the visitors.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
HB KøgeEsbjerg
18Shots17
HB KøgeEsbjerg
1Shots on target6
HB KøgeEsbjerg
1.75xG1.87
HB KøgeEsbjerg
7Corners6
HB KøgeEsbjerg
75Dangerous attacks52
HB KøgeEsbjerg
8Fouls13
HB KøgeEsbjerg
0Cards3
HB KøgeEsbjerg

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.21Goals scored / match1.47
HB KøgeEsbjerg
1.84Goals conceded / match1.37
HB KøgeEsbjerg
42%Average possession49%
HB KøgeEsbjerg
3.68Shots on target / match5.05
HB KøgeEsbjerg

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.74Shots per match13
HB KøgeEsbjerg
3.68Shots on target5.05
HB KøgeEsbjerg
10.3%Shot conversion11.3%
HB KøgeEsbjerg
42%Possession49%
HB KøgeEsbjerg
1.29xG for1.52
HB KøgeEsbjerg
1.65xG against1.43
HB KøgeEsbjerg

Shooting quality

HB Køge: BalancedEsbjerg: Balanced
HB KøgeEsbjerg
Accuracy (shots on target)31%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Esbjerg is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - HB Køge · 2.4 pts / match - Esbjerg

HB Køge
WDDLD
Season result split
26% W21% D53% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-10
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%
Esbjerg
WWLWW
Season result split
53% W11% D37% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-2-7
1.68 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-0-5
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Esbjerg is 21% better for: goals scored per match.

1.21 goals / match - HB Køge · 1.47 goals / match - Esbjerg

Esbjerg is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.84 goals / match - HB Køge · 1.37 goals / match - Esbjerg

HB Køge scoring profile: very strong

HB Køge scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while Esbjerg keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

Esbjerg scoring profile: very strong

Esbjerg scores in 68% of matches (13 of 19 matches), while HB Køge keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).

23Goals scored (season)28
HB KøgeEsbjerg
35Goals conceded (season)26
HB KøgeEsbjerg
3.05Average goals in match2.84
HB KøgeEsbjerg
8Goals scored (last 5)12
HB KøgeEsbjerg
8Goals conceded (last 5)8
HB KøgeEsbjerg

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal68%
HB KøgeEsbjerg
37%2 goals37%
HB KøgeEsbjerg
5%3 goals26%
HB KøgeEsbjerg
0%4 goals11%
HB KøgeEsbjerg

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal84%
HB KøgeEsbjerg
63%2 goals47%
HB KøgeEsbjerg
26%3 goals5%
HB KøgeEsbjerg
5%4 goals0%
HB KøgeEsbjerg

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time21%
HB KøgeEsbjerg
5%BTTS in both halves11%
HB KøgeEsbjerg
26%Scored in both halves32%
HB KøgeEsbjerg

BTTS and goal count

58%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
HB KøgeEsbjerg
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
HB KøgeEsbjerg
100%BTTS - last 580%
HB KøgeEsbjerg

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
HB KøgeEsbjerg
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
HB KøgeEsbjerg
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
HB KøgeEsbjerg

2nd half

95%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
HB KøgeEsbjerg
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
HB KøgeEsbjerg
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
HB KøgeEsbjerg

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

HB Køge - half-time state
26% leading37% draw37% trailing
Esbjerg - half-time state
32% leading26% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.16Points per match (1st half)1.21
HB KøgeEsbjerg
0.42Goals scored (1st half)0.68
HB KøgeEsbjerg
0.84Goals conceded (1st half)0.74
HB KøgeEsbjerg
1.26Average goals (1st half)1.42
HB KøgeEsbjerg
53%Clean sheet before half-time37%
HB KøgeEsbjerg
58%No goal before half-time63%
HB KøgeEsbjerg

After half-time (2nd half)

1.37Points per match (2nd half)1.37
HB KøgeEsbjerg
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
HB KøgeEsbjerg
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
HB KøgeEsbjerg
1.79Average goals (2nd half)1.42
HB KøgeEsbjerg
32%Clean sheet after half-time42%
HB KøgeEsbjerg
37%No goal after half-time37%
HB KøgeEsbjerg

HB Køge - second-half results

37% W26% D37% L
22
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Esbjerg - second-half results

32% W42% D26% L
23
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding166%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

HB Køge - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
Esbjerg - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match2.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

HB Køge
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
1
3
16-30
4
7
31-45
5
7
46-60
3
6
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Esbjerg
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
4
5
16-30
3
3
31-45
4
4
46-60
9
2
61-75
2
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.95
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+70%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

HB Køge

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Esbjerg

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.72
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1st Division).

Teams vs league

HB KøgeLigaEsbjerg
Average goals in match 3.052.82 2.84
Both teams scored 68%58% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%57% 47%
Clean sheets 11%24% 16%
Goal before half-time 74%77% 79%
Goal after half-time 95%81% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.82
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. EsbjergYellow cardSander Eng Strand
  2. EsbjergYellow cardPeter Bjur
  3. EsbjergSubstitutionOn: Noah Oliver StrandbyOff: Sander Eng Strand
  4. EsbjergYellow cardMuamer Brajanac

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Jesper NielsenMatches officiated: 14
3.5Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 214%Home wins43%Draws43%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: HB Køge 0 - 0 - 1 Esbjerg. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Esbjerg fB
3 : 2
HB Køge

FAQ

What was the result of HB Køge vs Esbjerg?

The 1st Division match finished HB Køge 0:1 Esbjerg. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before HB Køge vs Esbjerg?

HB Køge score 1.21 goals per game on average and Esbjerg 1.47. The 1st Division average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 68% of HB Køge's matches and 53% of Esbjerg's.

What form are HB Køge and Esbjerg in?

Over the last 5 games HB Køge have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Esbjerg 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for HB Køge vs Esbjerg?

The statistical background for HB Køge vs Esbjerg — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.