Ghana - Ghana Premier LeagueData current as of 13 September 2026

Hearts of Oak vs Gamba All Blacks: match statistics

Hearts of Oak vs Gamba All Blacks: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Hearts of Oak played Gamba All Blacks in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match was played on 29 March 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Hearts of Oak: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Gamba All Blacks: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Hearts of Oak scores 0.68 and concedes 0.32 goals per match. Gamba All Blacks scores 0.81 and concedes 0.85. League average: 1.86 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Hearts of Oak 12%, Gamba All Blacks 27%. Over 2.5: Hearts of Oak 16%, Gamba All Blacks 19%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 31%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Hearts of Oak: 6.8 shots per match, Gamba All Blacks: 9.2.

Match halves

Hearts of Oak: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.36. Gamba All Blacks: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.35.

Goals by minute

Hearts of Oak: 61-75 (5 goals). Gamba All Blacks: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ghana Premier League: 1.86 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 31%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistics indicate a defensive advantage for the hosts — Hearts of Oak concede only 0.18 per home match and have 91% clean sheets, drastically reducing opponents’ chances. At the same time the hosts score little (0.55 goals at home) and 64% of home matches end in draws, which favors a no-decision outcome. Gamba All Blacks show poor away form (75% losses, avg 1.25 conceded away and 67% matches without scoring), reducing their prospects for a win. xG and shot differences are small and both teams have low efficiency, suggesting few goals. Consequently the most likely result is a low-scoring draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Analysis indicates low probability of both teams scoring: Hearts of Oak have high CS rate (57%) and low goals conceded (0.5), and the league has very high CS share (85%). Gamba All Blacks register fewer shots (7.89), low scoring avg (0.58) and season BTTS 25%, suggesting difficulty breaking down defenses. Last5 BTTS rates are low (home 20%, away 0%) and scoring averages ~0.4, favoring a one-sided or low-scoring outcome. xG favors hosts but their defensive edge and high CS rate point to BTTS = No with high confidence.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Data point to a low-scoring match: Hearts of Oak have strong defense (57% CS, ga_season_home 8) and low real goal conversion despite high xG. Gamba All Blacks struggle away in finishing (seasonScoredAVG_away 0.58, seasonConcededAVG_away 1.25) and both teams show low BTTS (29% and 25%). Season Over 2.5 rates are low (home 14%, away 25%) and league avg is only 1.86 goals per match. Considering xG vs actual goals discrepancy, many home clean sheets and low league average, Under 2.5 is most probable.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistical analysis shows a clear advantage for Hearts of Oak: higher xG (1.48 vs 1.03), better PPG and a much higher win percentage (43% vs 17%), increasing the likelihood of leading and winning. The hosts also have superior defence (xG against 0.98 vs 1.48) and a high season HT clean sheet rate (seasonCSPercentageHT 71%), which supports holding a lead after the break. Low BTTS and a high share of matches without conceding suggest few goals and a low probability of a turnaround. For these reasons the most likely and strongest signal is leading at HT and winning at FT (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
18Shots11
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
4Shots on target4
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
1.92xG1.3
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
4Corners1
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
73Dangerous attacks45
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
-1Fouls-1
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
1Cards1
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
0.68Goals scored / match0.81
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
0.32Goals conceded / match0.85
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
47%Average possession45%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
2.92Shots on target / match2.73
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.84Shots per match9.19
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
2.92Shots on target2.73
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
9.9%Shot conversion8.8%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
47%Possession45%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
1.3xG for1.3
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
1.08xG against1.19
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks

Shooting quality

Hearts of Oak: BalancedGamba All Blacks: Balanced
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
Accuracy (shots on target)43%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Gamba All Blacks is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Hearts of Oak · 1.4 pts / match - Gamba All Blacks

Hearts of Oak
WDLDD
Season result split
40% W48% D12% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-12-3
1.68 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-7-0
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
WDDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Gamba All Blacks
WLDLW
Season result split
31% W27% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-11
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-9
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 0.96BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gamba All Blacks is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

0.68 goals / match - Hearts of Oak · 0.81 goals / match - Gamba All Blacks

Hearts of Oak is 166% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.32 goals / match - Hearts of Oak · 0.85 goals / match - Gamba All Blacks

Hearts of Oak scoring profile: mixed

Hearts of Oak scores in 48% of matches (12 of 25 matches), while Gamba All Blacks keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).

Gamba All Blacks scoring profile: more difficult

Gamba All Blacks scores in 50% of matches (13 of 26 matches), while Hearts of Oak keeps a clean sheet in 80% (20 of 25 matches).

17Goals scored (season)21
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
8Goals conceded (season)22
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
1Average goals in match1.65
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
2Goals scored (last 5)2
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
2Goals conceded (last 5)2
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks

How often they score at least...

48%1 goal50%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
16%2 goals23%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
4%3 goals8%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
0%4 goals0%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks

How often they concede at least...

20%1 goal62%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
12%2 goals23%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
0%3 goals0%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
0%4 goals0%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

33%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time8%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
12%Scored in both halves19%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks

BTTS and goal count

12%Min. 3 goals and BTTS15%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
20%BTTS - last 50%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
4%Min. 2 goals before half-time19%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks

2nd half

32%Min. 1 goal after half-time58%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time15%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Hearts of Oak is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / match - Hearts of Oak · 1.35 pts / match - Gamba All Blacks

Hearts of Oak - half-time state
32% leading60% draw8% trailing
Gamba All Blacks - half-time state
31% leading42% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)1.35
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.46
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
0.12Goals conceded (1st half)0.46
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
0.44Average goals (1st half)0.92
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
92%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
68%No goal before half-time65%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks

After half-time (2nd half)

1.24Points per match (2nd half)1.31
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
0.36Goals scored (2nd half)0.35
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
0.2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
0.56Average goals (2nd half)0.73
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
84%Clean sheet after half-time69%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks
72%No goal after half-time65%
Hearts of OakGamba All Blacks

Hearts of Oak - second-half results

16% W76% D8% L
39
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Gamba All Blacks - second-half results

27% W50% D23% L
35
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Hearts of Oak - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.40.4
1 goal40%20%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Gamba All Blacks - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.40.4
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Hearts of Oak
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
5
3
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Gamba All Blacks
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
3
5
16-30
6
7
31-45
3
3
46-60
3
3
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.33
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
72%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
20%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
24%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
26%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Hearts of Oak

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-19.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.62
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.76
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Gamba All Blacks

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
135%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).

Teams vs league

Hearts of OakLigaGamba All Blacks
Average goals in match 1.001.86 1.65
Both teams scored 12%33% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 16%31% 19%
Clean sheets 80%43% 38%
Goal before half-time 40%60% 62%
Goal after half-time 32%60% 58%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.86
Average goals per match
33%
Both teams scored
31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
43%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.60
Away goals / match
+110%
Home attack advantage
+52%
Home defence advantage
+42%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Gamba All BlacksGoalRudolf Nana Kwasi Mensah
  2. Gamba All BlacksYellow cardRoland Leveh
  3. Hearts of OakYellow cardMawuli Wayo
  4. Hearts of OakGoalMawuli Wayo
  5. Hearts of OakGoalFrank Abora Duku

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Hearts of Oak 0 - 1 - 0 Gamba All Blacks. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Gamba All Blacks
0 : 0
Hearts of Oak

FAQ

What was the result of Hearts of Oak vs Gamba All Blacks?

The Ghana Premier League match finished Hearts of Oak 2:2 Gamba All Blacks. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Hearts of Oak vs Gamba All Blacks?

Hearts of Oak score 0.68 goals per game on average and Gamba All Blacks 0.81. The Ghana Premier League average is 1.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 12% of Hearts of Oak's matches and 27% of Gamba All Blacks's.

What form are Hearts of Oak and Gamba All Blacks in?

Over the last 5 games Hearts of Oak have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Gamba All Blacks 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hearts of Oak vs Gamba All Blacks?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.