Hebei Kungfu vs Shanghai Jiading: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Hebei Kungfu vs Shanghai Jiading: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Hebei Kungfu play Shanghai Jiading in China League One (China). The match date is 24 October 2026.
Current form
Hebei Kungfu: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Shanghai Jiading: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Hebei Kungfu scores 0.85 and concedes 0.96 goals per match. Shanghai Jiading scores 1.04 and concedes 1.19. League average: 2.65 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Hebei Kungfu 41%, Shanghai Jiading 48%. Over 2.5: Hebei Kungfu 37%, Shanghai Jiading 41%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Shanghai Jiading has higher xG: 1.16 vs 1.03. Hebei Kungfu: 9.1 shots per match, Shanghai Jiading: 8.9.
Match halves
Hebei Kungfu: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.37. Shanghai Jiading: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.59.
Goals by minute
Hebei Kungfu: 31-45+ (8 goals). Shanghai Jiading: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
China League One: 2.65 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 1.67, BTTS 33%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Hebei Kungfu | Shanghai Jiading | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Hebei Kungfu is 300% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Hebei Kungfu · 0.4 pts / match - Shanghai Jiading
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shanghai Jiading is 22% better for: goals scored per match.
0.85 goals / match - Hebei Kungfu · 1.04 goals / match - Shanghai Jiading
Hebei Kungfu is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.96 goals / match - Hebei Kungfu · 1.19 goals / match - Shanghai Jiading
Hebei Kungfu scores in 56% of matches (15 of 27 matches), while Shanghai Jiading keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).
Shanghai Jiading scores in 67% of matches (18 of 27 matches), while Hebei Kungfu keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hebei Kungfu
Over / Under - Shanghai Jiading
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hebei Kungfu is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.48 pts / match - Hebei Kungfu · 1 pts / match - Shanghai Jiading
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hebei Kungfu - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Shanghai Jiading - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Hebei Kungfu
Shanghai Jiading
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Hebei Kungfu | Liga | Shanghai Jiading | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.81 | 2.65 | ▼ 2.22 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 54% | ▼ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 37% | 50% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 27% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 48% | 69% | ▼ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 59% | 74% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Hebei Kungfu 1 - 1 - 1 Shanghai Jiading. Average goals 1.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
When do Hebei Kungfu and Shanghai Jiading play?
Hebei Kungfu face Shanghai Jiading on 24 October 2026 in China League One. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Hebei Kungfu and Shanghai Jiading?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Hebei Kungfu won 1, Shanghai Jiading won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Hebei Kungfu vs Shanghai Jiading?
Hebei Kungfu score 0.85 goals per game on average and Shanghai Jiading 1.04. The China League One average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Hebei Kungfu's matches and 48% of Shanghai Jiading's.
What form are Hebei Kungfu and Shanghai Jiading in?
Over the last 5 games Hebei Kungfu have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Shanghai Jiading 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hebei Kungfu vs Shanghai Jiading?
The statistical background for Hebei Kungfu vs Shanghai Jiading — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.