Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Suzhou Dongwu: match statistics
Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Suzhou Dongwu: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Heilongjiang Lava Spring played Suzhou Dongwu in China League One (China). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Final score: 3:4.
Current form
Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Suzhou Dongwu: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores 1.50 and concedes 1.90 goals per match. Suzhou Dongwu scores 0.85 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Heilongjiang Lava Spring 85%, Suzhou Dongwu 50%. Over 2.5: Heilongjiang Lava Spring 60%, Suzhou Dongwu 45%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Heilongjiang Lava Spring has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.29. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 10.8 shots per match, Suzhou Dongwu: 9.4.
Match halves
Heilongjiang Lava Spring: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.75. Suzhou Dongwu: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.65.
Goals by minute
Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 16-30 (6 goals). Suzhou Dongwu: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
China League One: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Heilongjiang Lava Spring have an edge in chance creation at home, averaging 13 shots, 5 of them on target, while their xG stands at 1.56 compared with Suzhou’s 0.94 away from home. However, the hosts are highly vulnerable defensively, conceding an average of 1.70 goals in home matches and failing to keep a single clean sheet. Suzhou score just 0.89 goals per away game and fail to find the net in as many as 44% of such fixtures, but they arrive on the back of a five-match unbeaten run, consisting of 2 wins and 3 draws, with only 4 goals conceded. Both teams draw frequently in their respective settings — 40% of Heilongjiang’s home matches and 44% of Suzhou’s away games — making a share of the points the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest argument in favor of BTTS is Heilongjiang’s current form: in their last 5 matches, both teams scored in 100% of games, while the team averaged 1.8 goals scored but conceded as many as 2.6. Over the same period, Suzhou recorded only 40% BTTS, but averaged 1.2 goals and created chances worth 1.40 xG, while the hosts allowed opponents 1.83 xG. The hosts average 11.55 shots compared with Suzhou’s 6.78 and generate higher seasonal xG—1.57 versus the visitors’ 0.94—which should give them a realistic chance of scoring. Suzhou’s defence has nevertheless been more solid over the last five matches, averaging 0.8 goals conceded and 1.25 xG allowed, so the scenario with both teams scoring is not a clear-cut one. Even so, Heilongjiang’s recent defensive weakness and Suzhou’s 56% seasonal BTTS rate provide slight support for the “yes” option.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is on Under 3.5 goals, as Heilongjiang’s matches finished below this line in 82% of cases throughout the season, compared with 78% for Suzhou. Suzhou score just 0.89 goals per match on average, while the hosts average 0.82, meaning both teams’ baseline attacking output remains well below the league average of 2.71 goals. However, the hosts have been in weaker defensive form, conceding 2.6 goals per match over their last five outings, which raises the projected tally for the visitors despite their limited attack. At the same time, Suzhou have conceded just 0.8 goals per match across those five games, while only 18% of the hosts’ matches and 22% of the visitors’ matches have exceeded four goals over the season. The projected 2.55 goals points to a realistic possibility of three goals, but a scenario with at least four remains clearly less likely.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is strongly supported by the profile of both teams: Heilongjiang were level after 45 minutes in 45% of their matches, while Suzhou recorded a draw at the break in 44%, with averages of just 0.82 and 0.67 goals scored in the first half, respectively. In their last five matches, Suzhou went into the interval level on four occasions, failing to score before half-time and conceding just 0.4 goals per match. After the break, however, the visitors have shown clearly better current form: they average 1.2 goals scored and 0.4 conceded, while their five-match record stands at two wins and three draws, with no defeats. Over the same period, Heilongjiang conceded an average of 2.6 goals per full match and lost in the second half in 60% of their games. Although the hosts create more chances, as indicated by their xG of 1.57 compared with Suzhou’s 0.94, their shot conversion rate is only 7%, versus 13% for Suzhou. Therefore, the most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Suzhou win.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Heilongjiang Lava Spring | Suzhou Dongwu | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Suzhou Dongwu is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 1.8 pts / match - Suzhou Dongwu
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Heilongjiang Lava Spring is 76% better for: goals scored per match.
1.5 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 0.85 goals / match - Suzhou Dongwu
Suzhou Dongwu is 46% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.9 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 1.3 goals / match - Suzhou Dongwu
Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores in 90% of matches (18 of 20 matches), while Suzhou Dongwu keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).
Suzhou Dongwu scores in 60% of matches (12 of 20 matches), while Heilongjiang Lava Spring keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Over / Under - Suzhou Dongwu
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Heilongjiang Lava Spring is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 0.9 pts / match - Suzhou Dongwu
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Suzhou Dongwu - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Suzhou Dongwu
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Heilongjiang Lava Spring | Liga | Suzhou Dongwu | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.40 | 2.71 | ▼ 2.15 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 85% | 56% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 54% | ▼ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 5% | 26% | • 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 73% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 73% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Heilongjiang Lava Spring 2 - 0 - 1 Suzhou Dongwu. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Suzhou Dongwu?
The China League One match finished Heilongjiang Lava Spring 3:4 Suzhou Dongwu. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Heilongjiang Lava Spring and Suzhou Dongwu?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Heilongjiang Lava Spring won 2, Suzhou Dongwu won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Suzhou Dongwu?
Heilongjiang Lava Spring score 1.50 goals per game on average and Suzhou Dongwu 0.85. The China League One average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 85% of Heilongjiang Lava Spring's matches and 50% of Suzhou Dongwu's.
What form are Heilongjiang Lava Spring and Suzhou Dongwu in?
Over the last 5 games Heilongjiang Lava Spring have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Suzhou Dongwu 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Suzhou Dongwu?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


