China - China League OneData current as of 01 September 2026

Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Suzhou Dongwu: match statistics

Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Suzhou Dongwu: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Heilongjiang Lava Spring played Suzhou Dongwu in China League One (China). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Final score: 3:4.

Current form

Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Suzhou Dongwu: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores 1.50 and concedes 1.90 goals per match. Suzhou Dongwu scores 0.85 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Heilongjiang Lava Spring 85%, Suzhou Dongwu 50%. Over 2.5: Heilongjiang Lava Spring 60%, Suzhou Dongwu 45%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Heilongjiang Lava Spring has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.29. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 10.8 shots per match, Suzhou Dongwu: 9.4.

Match halves

Heilongjiang Lava Spring: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.75. Suzhou Dongwu: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 16-30 (6 goals). Suzhou Dongwu: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

China League One: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Heilongjiang Lava Spring have an edge in chance creation at home, averaging 13 shots, 5 of them on target, while their xG stands at 1.56 compared with Suzhou’s 0.94 away from home. However, the hosts are highly vulnerable defensively, conceding an average of 1.70 goals in home matches and failing to keep a single clean sheet. Suzhou score just 0.89 goals per away game and fail to find the net in as many as 44% of such fixtures, but they arrive on the back of a five-match unbeaten run, consisting of 2 wins and 3 draws, with only 4 goals conceded. Both teams draw frequently in their respective settings — 40% of Heilongjiang’s home matches and 44% of Suzhou’s away games — making a share of the points the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument in favor of BTTS is Heilongjiang’s current form: in their last 5 matches, both teams scored in 100% of games, while the team averaged 1.8 goals scored but conceded as many as 2.6. Over the same period, Suzhou recorded only 40% BTTS, but averaged 1.2 goals and created chances worth 1.40 xG, while the hosts allowed opponents 1.83 xG. The hosts average 11.55 shots compared with Suzhou’s 6.78 and generate higher seasonal xG—1.57 versus the visitors’ 0.94—which should give them a realistic chance of scoring. Suzhou’s defence has nevertheless been more solid over the last five matches, averaging 0.8 goals conceded and 1.25 xG allowed, so the scenario with both teams scoring is not a clear-cut one. Even so, Heilongjiang’s recent defensive weakness and Suzhou’s 56% seasonal BTTS rate provide slight support for the “yes” option.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is on Under 3.5 goals, as Heilongjiang’s matches finished below this line in 82% of cases throughout the season, compared with 78% for Suzhou. Suzhou score just 0.89 goals per match on average, while the hosts average 0.82, meaning both teams’ baseline attacking output remains well below the league average of 2.71 goals. However, the hosts have been in weaker defensive form, conceding 2.6 goals per match over their last five outings, which raises the projected tally for the visitors despite their limited attack. At the same time, Suzhou have conceded just 0.8 goals per match across those five games, while only 18% of the hosts’ matches and 22% of the visitors’ matches have exceeded four goals over the season. The projected 2.55 goals points to a realistic possibility of three goals, but a scenario with at least four remains clearly less likely.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is strongly supported by the profile of both teams: Heilongjiang were level after 45 minutes in 45% of their matches, while Suzhou recorded a draw at the break in 44%, with averages of just 0.82 and 0.67 goals scored in the first half, respectively. In their last five matches, Suzhou went into the interval level on four occasions, failing to score before half-time and conceding just 0.4 goals per match. After the break, however, the visitors have shown clearly better current form: they average 1.2 goals scored and 0.4 conceded, while their five-match record stands at two wins and three draws, with no defeats. Over the same period, Heilongjiang conceded an average of 2.6 goals per full match and lost in the second half in 60% of their games. Although the hosts create more chances, as indicated by their xG of 1.57 compared with Suzhou’s 0.94, their shot conversion rate is only 7%, versus 13% for Suzhou. Therefore, the most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Suzhou win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
1 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
19Shots22
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
5Shots on target10
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
1.83xG2.62
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
3Corners6
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
40Dangerous attacks75
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
15Fouls16
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
0Cards2
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
1.5Goals scored / match0.85
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
1.9Goals conceded / match1.3
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
51%Average possession44%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
4.25Shots on target / match3.1
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.8Shots per match9.4
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
4.25Shots on target3.1
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
13.9%Shot conversion9%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
51%Possession44%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
1.32xG for1.29
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
1.58xG against1.47
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu

Shooting quality

Heilongjiang Lava Spring: Efficient finishingSuzhou Dongwu: Balanced
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
Accuracy (shots on target)39%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Suzhou Dongwu is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 1.8 pts / match - Suzhou Dongwu

Heilongjiang Lava Spring
DLWDL
Season result split
20% W50% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-10-6
1.10 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Suzhou Dongwu
DWWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W35% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-7-9
0.95 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-4
Last 5 away
0-4-1
DDLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring is 76% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 0.85 goals / match - Suzhou Dongwu

Suzhou Dongwu is 46% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.9 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 1.3 goals / match - Suzhou Dongwu

Heilongjiang Lava Spring scoring profile: very strong

Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores in 90% of matches (18 of 20 matches), while Suzhou Dongwu keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).

Suzhou Dongwu scoring profile: very strong

Suzhou Dongwu scores in 60% of matches (12 of 20 matches), while Heilongjiang Lava Spring keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 20 matches).

30Goals scored (season)17
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
38Goals conceded (season)26
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
3.4Average goals in match2.15
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
9Goals scored (last 5)6
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
13Goals conceded (last 5)4
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu

How often they score at least...

90%1 goal60%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
40%2 goals20%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
15%3 goals5%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
5%4 goals0%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu

How often they concede at least...

95%1 goal75%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
45%2 goals35%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
35%3 goals20%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
10%4 goals0%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

85%
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.17 of 20 matches
56%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time5%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
15%BTTS in both halves0%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
25%Scored in both halves5%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
100%BTTS - last 540%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 0.9 pts / match - Suzhou Dongwu

Heilongjiang Lava Spring - half-time state
30% leading30% draw40% trailing
Suzhou Dongwu - half-time state
15% leading45% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per match (1st half)0.9
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.2
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
0.9Goals conceded (1st half)0.55
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
1.65Average goals (1st half)0.75
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
40%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
45%No goal before half-time80%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu

After half-time (2nd half)

1.1Points per match (2nd half)1.25
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
1.75Average goals (2nd half)1.4
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
30%Clean sheet after half-time45%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu
40%No goal after half-time55%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringSuzhou Dongwu

Heilongjiang Lava Spring - second-half results

25% W35% R40% P
24
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Suzhou Dongwu - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
18
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match1.41.2
Average goals in match2.42.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Suzhou Dongwu - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.20
Goals scored / match0.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.41.6
1 goal20%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-2+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
6
7
16-30
6
5
31-45
5
7
46-60
5
6
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Suzhou Dongwu
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
4
16-30
2
6
31-45
4
4
46-60
4
5
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.77
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
147%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Suzhou Dongwu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.85
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).

Teams vs league

Heilongjiang Lava SpringLigaSuzhou Dongwu
Average goals in match 3.402.71 2.15
Both teams scored 85%56% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%54% 45%
Clean sheets 5%26% 25%
Goal before half-time 85%73% 55%
Goal after half-time 85%73% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Suzhou DongwuGoalQiang JinAssist: Shen'ao Zhao
  2. Heilongjiang Lava SpringGoalShi TangAssist: Jiaxuan Zhu
  3. Heilongjiang Lava SpringGoalManuel Emilio Palacios MurilloAssist: Su Gao
  4. Suzhou DongwuYellow carddalun Gao
  5. Heilongjiang Lava SpringSubstitutionOn: Junpeng DuOff: Yucheng Hao
  6. Suzhou DongwuGoalJunjie WuAssist: Binhan Wang
  7. Suzhou DongwuYellow cardBinhan Wang
  8. Suzhou DongwuSubstitutionOn: Jiansheng ZhangOff: Junjie Yuan
  9. Suzhou DongwuGoalJunjie Wu
  10. Heilongjiang Lava SpringGoalMarcel PetrovAssist: Shi Tang
  11. Heilongjiang Lava SpringSubstitutionOn: Zimin ZhangOff: Yuchen Han
  12. Heilongjiang Lava SpringSubstitutionOn: Po-liang ChenOff: Su Gao
  13. Suzhou DongwuGoalMirzat Ali
  14. Suzhou DongwuSubstitutionOn: Anfal YarematiOff: Mirzat Ali
  15. Heilongjiang Lava SpringSubstitutionOn: Mingxin ZhuOff: Jiaxuan Zhu
  16. Heilongjiang Lava SpringYellow cardDaciel Elis Santos
  17. Suzhou DongwuSubstitutionOn: Jiqiang LiuOff: Farley Vieira Rosa

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Heilongjiang Lava Spring 2 - 0 - 1 Suzhou Dongwu. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Suzhou Dongwu
0 : 1
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Suzhou Dongwu FC
1 : 0
Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC
Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC
3 : 1
Suzhou Dongwu FC

FAQ

What was the result of Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Suzhou Dongwu?

The China League One match finished Heilongjiang Lava Spring 3:4 Suzhou Dongwu. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Heilongjiang Lava Spring and Suzhou Dongwu?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Heilongjiang Lava Spring won 2, Suzhou Dongwu won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Suzhou Dongwu?

Heilongjiang Lava Spring score 1.50 goals per game on average and Suzhou Dongwu 0.85. The China League One average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 85% of Heilongjiang Lava Spring's matches and 50% of Suzhou Dongwu's.

What form are Heilongjiang Lava Spring and Suzhou Dongwu in?

Over the last 5 games Heilongjiang Lava Spring have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Suzhou Dongwu 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Suzhou Dongwu?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.