China - China League OneChangzhou Olympic Sports CenterData current as of 21 October 2026

Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Yanbian Longding: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Yanbian Longding: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Heilongjiang Lava Spring play Yanbian Longding in China League One (China). The match date is 25 October 2026. Venue: Changzhou Olympic Sports Center.

Current form

Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Yanbian Longding: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores 1.41 and concedes 1.81 goals per match. Yanbian Longding scores 1.44 and concedes 1.07. League average: 2.65 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Heilongjiang Lava Spring 78%, Yanbian Longding 52%. Over 2.5: Heilongjiang Lava Spring 56%, Yanbian Longding 48%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Heilongjiang Lava Spring has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.22. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 11.1 shots per match, Yanbian Longding: 10.5.

Match halves

Heilongjiang Lava Spring: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.70. Yanbian Longding: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.74.

Goals by minute

Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 61-75 (9 goals). Yanbian Longding: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

China League One: 2.65 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 33%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
1.41Goals scored / match1.44
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
1.81Goals conceded / match1.07
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
49%Average possession53%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
4.07Shots on target / match3.89
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.11Shots per match10.52
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
4.07Shots on target3.89
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
12.7%Shot conversion13.7%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
49%Possession53%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
1.33xG for1.22
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
1.64xG against1.24
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding

Shooting quality

Heilongjiang Lava Spring: BalancedYanbian Longding: Efficient finishing
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
Accuracy (shots on target)37%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 0.8 pts / match - Yanbian Longding

Heilongjiang Lava Spring
LDDLW
Season result split
19% W44% D37% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-12-10
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-6-5
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Yanbian Longding
LLDLW
Season result split
37% W33% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-9-8
1.44 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Yanbian Longding is 69% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.81 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 1.07 goals / match - Yanbian Longding

Heilongjiang Lava Spring scoring profile: very strong

Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores in 85% of matches (23 of 27 matches), while Yanbian Longding keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).

Yanbian Longding scoring profile: very strong

Yanbian Longding scores in 67% of matches (18 of 27 matches), while Heilongjiang Lava Spring keeps a clean sheet in 11% (3 of 27 matches).

38Goals scored (season)39
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
49Goals conceded (season)29
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
3.22Average goals in match2.52
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
4Goals scored (last 5)8
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal67%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
37%2 goals41%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
15%3 goals26%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
4%4 goals7%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal70%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
44%2 goals30%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
33%3 goals7%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
11%4 goals0%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

78%
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.21 of 27 matches
52%
Yanbian Longding - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 27 matches
54%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time22%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
15%BTTS in both halves7%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
22%Scored in both halves30%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
40%BTTS - last 560%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Yanbian Longding is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.3 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 1.37 pts / match - Yanbian Longding

Heilongjiang Lava Spring - half-time state
30% leading41% draw30% trailing
Yanbian Longding - half-time state
33% leading37% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.3Points per match (1st half)1.37
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
0.7Goals scored (1st half)0.7
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
0.74Goals conceded (1st half)0.52
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
1.44Average goals (1st half)1.22
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
48%Clean sheet before half-time52%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
48%No goal before half-time48%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding

After half-time (2nd half)

0.96Points per match (2nd half)1.37
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)0.74
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
1.07Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
1.78Average goals (2nd half)1.3
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
30%Clean sheet after half-time56%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding
44%No goal after half-time56%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringYanbian Longding

Heilongjiang Lava Spring - second-half results

22% W30% D48% L
35
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding63%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 19%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Yanbian Longding - second-half results

33% W37% D30% L
37
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding112%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Yanbian Longding - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
8
7
16-30
7
6
31-45
5
10
46-60
9
9
61-75
5
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Yanbian Longding
ScoredConceded
8
4
0-15
7
2
16-30
4
8
31-45
5
4
46-60
4
4
61-75
11
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.87
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
147%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Yanbian Longding

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.64
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).

Teams vs league

Heilongjiang Lava SpringLigaYanbian Longding
Average goals in match▲ 3.222.65▼ 2.52
Both teams scored▲ 78%54%▼ 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 56%50%▼ 48%
Clean sheets▼ 11%27%▲ 30%
Goal before half-time▲ 74%69%▲ 78%
Goal after half-time▲ 85%74%▼ 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.65
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / match
1.23
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Heilongjiang Lava Spring 1 - 0 - 2 Yanbian Longding. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Yanbian Longding
3 : 0
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC
2 : 1
Yanbian Longding FC
Yanbian Longding FC
3 : 0
Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC

FAQ

When do Heilongjiang Lava Spring and Yanbian Longding play?

Heilongjiang Lava Spring face Yanbian Longding on 25 October 2026 in China League One at Changzhou Olympic Sports Center. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Heilongjiang Lava Spring and Yanbian Longding?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Heilongjiang Lava Spring won 1, Yanbian Longding won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Yanbian Longding?

Heilongjiang Lava Spring score 1.41 goals per game on average and Yanbian Longding 1.44. The China League One average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 78% of Heilongjiang Lava Spring's matches and 52% of Yanbian Longding's.

What form are Heilongjiang Lava Spring and Yanbian Longding in?

Over the last 5 games Heilongjiang Lava Spring have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Yanbian Longding 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Yanbian Longding?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Yanbian Longding: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.